Teddy got re-elected(I remember a few years back when he barely won the election.)because of all the past gerrymandering done by the American Democratic Socialists, where the mass partake of the mass in the liberal state of mass(confusion).

So far, you are pretty much alone, especially if you had any political ambitions and wished to seek an endorsement.
So, what is the Democrat side of you(they do have a platform.)?

How about a conservative Christian?
John 3:36
What is a conservative Democrat? You accept abortions just less of them?
You allow for "absolute" liberty and "total" freedom of expression and agree with the rights of perversity but simply disallow the sanctioning of homosexual marriage?
Another key Democratic position is the redistribution of wealth. A Democrat would support an exorbitant tax rate on a particular class simply because they were either were talented and/or hard-working and therefore should be penalized. However, a Conservative Dem. might only want to penalize them
marginally?

"His mother said to the servants, whatever He says to you do it."
J

JOHN 3:36

JOHN 3:36

John 3:36

Wait until hyperinflation hits down the road and big gov. is in control.

Wow, there goes the entire Roman system.
Shall we start with Maryolatry?

We must remember that the TR differs from the Maj. text.
"Dr. Daniel Wallace counted 1,838 differences between the TR and the Majority Text("The Majority-Text Theory: History, Methods and Critique," Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, June 1994, p. 194)." pg. 6 Endnotes from "The King James Only Controversy".

I really don't have the time for all of this S.A. news forums but here it goes.

I was interested in this subject a few years ago and my concern led me to purchase a book by Dr. James White, "The King James Only Controversy".

page 65:
"Most of the time the differences between the TR and the modern texts are the same differences that exist between the Byzantine text-type and the other text-types such as the Alexandrian and the Western. But at times the TR goes off by itself and we find it either giving a reading that is not supported by Greek manuscripts at all, or by only a very few over against the large majority. It is important that the reader understand that the TR is NOT identical with the "Majority Text," even though it is closely related. The TR is its own text and it is often found in disagreement with the Majority Text as well as with the modern critical texts."

JOHN 3:36

This due sentence is the result.
When a mere man they do exalt.

Good luck(not mean-spirited but you are going to need it).
We are in deep trouble down here. All presidents over the past 50 or so years have succumbed to fear rhetoric and have stated positively towards or tried to initiate some kind of universal health care. Control! Only L.B.J. actually bulldozed it through(Obama is next with the Amer. Socialist in full control)and we have been a mess ever since. It is all about big gov. power and the Am. Soc. have extended their political base by lessening restrictions on mmigration(encouraging) and in former times the Amer. people were always totally against any gov. control. Now with all of the poor flooding Amer. soil for free handouts for the first time in our countrys history their is actually a strong voice in favor of national health care.
We have been a semi-socialist state since then and as a consequence things are out of whack. Governments first priority-defense of its citizenry-cannot be maintained because of all of the other costs that gov. has no business being in according to our Constitution.

Although, the Clintons have done some damage with their influence in years past(I believe because of Bill the medical tests now have to include cases such as AIDS in the pool, in figuring the avg. whereas before they were left out to figure the norm and were accurate. Now a test may reveal that their is nothing wrong with someone even though there is because of using extreme cases which were left out before.)we still receive great care.
Most people today have some kind of copay, maybe $15 office and $25 specialist. Do you receive Chiropractic? I recently received same day treatment and the appt. was given for 10 min. after I called. My family Dr. also have given me an appt. at the spur of the moment. Do you receive Orthodontic? I could go into more but choose not to. Rooms, even private rooms at times are no problem.
Care is always diminished with any public takeover. Eventually, you lose all real freedom of choice.

I can foresee all kind of problems here.
Question: (I will bring up the brain cancer issue again). Say, I am acting out of my normal behavior and it is obvious that something is terribly wrong. I go in for diagnostics and they discover that I have a brain tumor and that is the cause of the problem. However, because it is only a benign tumor I am told that I will not be put on the waiting list. I actually heard something like this today. Then what?
Things up your way are only going to get worse. The government makes no money. The outlook is not very sunny.
Of course here in the good ole U.S.A. the gov. acually owns or controls about 1/3 of the U.S. economy since the bailouts and will increase its domination after the Amer. Socialists political leadership majority puts this nationalistic health scare system into law, to approximately "40%"!!!
No more quick, quality urgent care across the border.
Wondering what your main points of choosing public over private health care?

That is one of the main problems with "free" giveaways of anything. People will line up for anything that they do not have to pay for.
With the oppressive intrusion of ever increasing taxes by letting big gov. be the provider the accompanying mindset will always be: "I am going to use this because not only does it not cost me something but they are funding this by me through taxes anyway." This hurts research and development long term. Competition is dwindled away and privatization suffers. Healthcare does not maintain its optimum performance level and people suffer.
Where will the people go for better care, available facilities, etc. when the U.S. goes socialistic?
So, YOU can't spend your own money in a private surgery centre on common heart surgery while other groups such as federal prisoners may.

I believe the times that I read that urgent care(cancer and the like take up to 4 months). Even if the provincial gov. made some improvements that of course would mean more money to invest. Guess what that translates into........
INCREASED TAXES! As big gov. runs head on into a wall and the taxes reach disproportionate levels there will only be one solution - HEALTH CARE CUTS(pun intended.) This my friend is where the Canadian Socialistic system seems to be headed.
As far as the federal arm of big gov. there are always restrictions or a catch somewhere. Question: If a regular person like myself happened to be living in B.C., would I be allowed to spend my own money on my own healhcare or are only some special interest groups, such as its federal prisoners, only allowed to use private surgery centres?