Sign in or signup
Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsSITE
Events | Local | Blogs
New Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -53 sec
Top Sermons
Daily Log
Photos
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Sermon DashboardNEW
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ TAKE HEED ”
RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | MoreLast PostTotal
Sermon Learning Dependence On The Lord | Rev David Silversides
David and Karen Biser from Cumberland, MD
"A much needed reminder of our terrible adversary, the devil, who goes..."
-12 hrs 
Sermon The Vision of Jesus pt2 | Eric Gervais
Christa Burnett from Nation City, MI
-12 hrs 
Sermon Funeral Interrupted and Canceled | Patrick Hines
John Bradshaw
-13 hrs 
· Page 1 ·  Found: 125 user comments posted recently.
News Item2/21/19 4:09 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
76
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
I wonder why take heed posted these sermons in 2012
That wasn't me. Sometimes people end up using previously used monikers. Happens.

Why are you playing the Devil's part here, constantly accusing everyone of everything under the sun?

UPS, thanks. Exactly what I'm thinking. She has an agenda and it's not nice. She clearly lives by contradictions which she's not prepared to explain to anyone. She's just another unaccountable professor of religion!


News Item2/21/19 2:10 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
76
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
Website: Stop Baptist Predators Blogspot
http://stopbaptistpredators.blogspot.com/2017/
Blog Entry of Christa Brown of JANUARY 25, 2017 - continued -
Backward steps in 2016
Despite the decade's many gains, 2016 was a year in which that “hopeless” word often took hold in my head. Not only was there the continuing flood of clergy abuse cases with the same awful patterns of cover-ups and do-nothingness, but there were also institutional decisions that made the Baptist badlands seem even bleaker.
For starters, in 2016, the Southern Baptist Convention, this country’s largest Protestant faith group, elected a known clergy sex abuse cover-upper as its president. It was as though the cover-up of child sex crimes had rendered the pastor promotion-worthy rather than making him subject to accountability.
The Baptist General Convention of Texas, the largest statewide Baptist denominational entity, announced that it was abolishing its confidential file of abusive ministers. Though the BGCT’s public relations people spun this as a positive, survivors saw it for what it was -- a step backwards.
- to be continued
I wonder what her agenda is in posting all this up on this thread?

News Item2/21/19 12:46 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
take heed . .
With respect to Spurgeon's comments commending RC Mystic “Madame Guyon”,
you give excuses, you make allowances, you show deference
but
With respect to John-UK, your professed “brother in Christ” who also commended RC Mystic “Madame Guyon”, you pronounce an unqualified censure
I see you have real problems understanding this thread, so let me make this very simple for you.

Spurgeon was wrong in his assessment of Guyon and if he were still alive, I would criticise him also. Difference is that Spurgeon would have been open to reassess his opinion and would have repented. John is nothing like Spurgeon either in attitude or knowledge.

If I am critical of both, how am I a respecter of persons?

You on the other hand can condemn Guyon but justify those who commend her! Not wise.

I'm glad you're done. Does this mean you'll now abandon the topic? Somehow I doubt that your appetite for being divisive will allow it.


News Item2/21/19 11:41 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
you're a respecter of persons.
Not at all. Spurgeon has been in glory for a long time and does not need any censure from me. He knows better now. John UK is a divisive character who speaks out of both sides of his mouth and refuses to learn. Period.

You will note that since his departure it has been really peaceful here.

You are imitating him and trying to stoke the flames and cause division, which does not reflect well on you.

Why don't you start answering some questions instead of always posing them?

1. Was Spurgeon right in his assessment of Guyon?
2. If so, why do you condemn Guyon?
3. If you condemn Guyon, why do you seek to justify John UK and Spurgeon?

Maybe the questions are too difficult for you?


News Item2/21/19 11:17 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
These are the words of C. H. Spurgeon, the "prince of preachers"
Spurgeon had the greater light
If he had the greater light and was right in his assessment, why do you condemn Guyon?

You wrote 2/20/19 6:30PM

I would NEVER commend her or her works, nor refer to her as a "noble Christian woman".

Maybe you're still thinking through your own position on whether to commend a practicing Roman Catholic who never said that Romanism was wrong doctrinally or otherwise? Can someone who is genuinely born again remain in the Harlot church or remain silent about the gross errors she teaches and promotes? Can such a person genuinely have a closer "mystical" relationship to God than someone who obediently separates from the false church and walks by faith, not by mystical feelings?

Do you know what mysticism teaches or how the RC mystics still teach RC as a valid way to God?


News Item2/21/19 10:55 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
That's just rubbish! Spurgeon lived from 1834 to 1892.
We know a great deal about Popery from the time of the Reformation, and from the writings of the Reformers and Puritans. All such resources Spurgeon had access to.

However, name me one volume written by either the Reformers or Puritans who wrote against Roman Catholic mystics. The mystics operated within the RCC, followed RC doctrine and practice etc and therefore were never the specific target of attacks by the Reformers or Puritans. Their specific form of "religion" has come to the fore in the 20th century as Rome stepped up her ecumenical efforts and attempted to fudge the differences between Protestants and Catholics on experiential grounds. Guyon is held out to us as a model RC Christian whom even Protestants could not object to as mysticism was on the rise

In the 20th century we have seen an explosion in the publication of the writings of these mystics, and also in Protestants answering these writings objecting to their use of seemingly orthodox language to hide their real Romanist teaching and their wholly unorthodox mysticism.

It is very telling how you keep parroting the same sentiments but refuse to answer the dilemma you've created for yourself.


News Item2/21/19 10:15 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
take heed and read . .
You trip over yourself to excuse and absolve C. H. Spurgeon for commending RC Mystic “Madame Guyon” . . and I quote:
“Also, Spurgeon was much too generous in his assessment of many, whether RC or otherwise. It is understandable therefore that Spurgeon mischaracterised her.”
Yet you deliver a harsh censor against John-UK for doing likewise? And I quote:
1) 2/3/19 9:35 PM Take heed
“This sycophantic swooning over the departure of JUK is quite sickening. The man said he believed in a gracious salvation and justification by faith alone but then went on to recommend Billy Graham despite his ecumenism and also Guyon a RC mystic”
Precisely because we enjoy greater light; we have resources that Spurgeon did not possess.

Back to you. How do you justify Spurgeon and yet still condemn Guyon? And if you condemn Guyon, why are you trying to justify John UK?


News Item2/21/19 9:45 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
That's just rubbish! Spurgeon lived from 1834 to 1892.
Spurgeon was well-read and well-acquainted with the writings of the Reformers as well as the writings of Roman Catholics. He was well-informed on Romanism/Popery.

I have provided quotes from Spurgeon's sermons in which he commends Roman Catholic mystic “Madame Guyon”,
so it is quite apparent that C. H. Spurgeon had access to the writings of “Madame Guyon” . . he quoted her . . he read what she wrote . . he commended her.

You clearly have a real issue here. If you insist that he had read her own writings and understood what a mystic like Guyon meant beyond the plain words she wrote (because mystics used common language to mean much more) then you must approve of Guyon as well. But you don't! So which is it? Spurgeon was right? In which case why do you disapprove? If Spurgeon was wrong, then why are you trying so hard to get him to be right?

I am beginning to wonder whether even you know exactly what you're arguing for here.

And all this subtle and futile web weaving is an attempt by you to extricate yourself from commending John UK when he approved of both her and Graham. Staggering.


News Item2/20/19 5:29 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
Why then does C. H. Spurge on commend her?
Much of what we know about Romanism was secret in Spurgeon's day, and certainly there was very little accessible information in the public domain of the writings and beliefs of the mystics. Also, Spurgeon was much too generous in his assessment of many, whether RC or otherwise. It is understandable therefore that Spurgeon mischaracterised her.

Why Graham did is clear viz. because he is an ecumenist and accepts RCs as Christians.

The question remains why, if you are against Guyon and Graham, did you defend John UK, when he is a defender of both Guyon and Graham?


News Item2/20/19 7:23 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
Wow . . the "Johns and the Marys, the favorites of heaven" ? ?
Citation: 1) Source: God's Pupil, God's Preacher: An Autobiography / July 28, 1889 by C. H. SPURGEON (1834-1892)
Link: http://www.biblebb.com/files/spurgeon/2318.htm
So you are saying that a practicing Roman Catholic who never renounced one RC doctrine, never separated, continued to observe all RC rituals, believed in trans-substantiation, believed that the Pope is the vicar of Christ, and who was a mystic, was nevertheless a true Christian.

I’m stunned. I have no words.


News Item2/19/19 8:14 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
47
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
Billy Graham: Servant of Rome, Not Servant of Christ
https://www.biblebasedministries.co.uk/2018/03/16/billy-graham-servant-of-rome-not-servant-of-christ/
The irony of all this June is that you chose to befriend and defend on here John UK who defended both Billy Graham and Madame Guyon! Perhaps your discernment needs to be a little sharper?

News Item2/11/19 5:45 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
33
comments
Frank wrote:
Same hypocrisy as Jim exhibits.
Why does Jim not have the instincts of a true Christian I wonder?

News Item2/11/19 5:35 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
10
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
“Another Democrat scandal in Virginia?” Yes. Read the Democrats’ platform, and you will quickly see that the entire party is a continuous, ongoing, epic and catastrophic national scandal. It is the morality of Gomorrah exacerbated by the politics of Herod; the wickedness of Jezebel compounded by the foolishness of Rehoboam. THIS is the party wicked Jim Lincoln and wicked George Will endorse. THIS is the cartel of reprobates who want to destroy everything good and decent and replace it with something vile and disgusting. THIS is not only scandalous, but downright evil, passel of perverts who will not rest until America takes her place on the dungheap of nations consumed by the wrath of God. May the party and its platform perish forever from the face of the earth.
Amen to that!

Lord have mercy on us!


News Item2/5/19 5:29 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
65
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
“ . .We give our hand to every man who loves the Lord Jesus Christ, be he what he may or who he may! ... I hold that there are many savingly called who do not believe in effectual calling and that there are a great many who persevere to the end, who do not believe the doctrine of final perseverance. We do hope that the hearts of many are a great deal better than their heads. We set not their fallacies down to any willful opposition to the truth as it is in Jesus, but simply to an error in their judgments, which we pray God to correct."
- C.H.Spurgeon - Sermon Entitled:
Effects of Sound Doctrine
John Wesley loved Christ and Spurgeon would have extended the hand to him as a brother in Christ.

You quote Spurgeon approvingly and yet these are the very things you don’t allow for as demonstrated in the loaded questions which you used to try and bait me. Shame that you’re so blind to it.

Dr Tim - great quote!


News Item2/5/19 11:46 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
65
comments
penned wrote:
so Brother John UK was run off now?
What a strange reading of the situation. Who exactly ran him off?

News Item2/4/19 2:46 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
65
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
*****
For clarification . . the above-ref post was made by John's brother in Christ
on 2/4/19 10:14 AM
See for yourself!
First of many questions:

Who here has called JUK an apostate?


News Item2/4/19 2:33 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
65
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
******
Note: the above-ref. comment was posted by John's brother in Christ on 2/4/19 10:14 AM
on this thread
imo sir . . you have spoken as a true brother in Christ
I don’t think anyone is going to trust the word of a woman who cannot tell when her questions have been answered or one who doesn’t question the allegations made to see if they be true or to see if the spirit of the post is even consistent with its own demands. Sad blindness.

News Item2/4/19 1:48 PM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
65
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
John's brother in Christ wrote:
"Only Vultures would be circling for bones as one would think he was 'suddenly' an apostate by all the clamour. He makes simple challenges to some posters who maintain that they are biblicists...show me the men who preach the same and the churches that do likewise and he could show you thousands on SermonAudio that hold to the same doctrine as himself, including the founder of SermonAudio. He doesn't hide the fact where he stands ... J C Ryle's evangelistic preaching and where he believes the 1689 confession is scriptural. So he will be sadly missed.
'And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you.' Eph 4:32
*****
imo . . You have spoken as a true brother in Christ
Who has called JUK an apostate?

When anyone speaks against JUK they are vultures? How exactly does this sit with Eph 4.32? On the one hand insist that we be kind, tender hearted etc but on the other dish out abuse and false allegations because that’s the Christian thing to do? Unbelievable!!


News Item2/4/19 11:46 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
65
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
No sir, you haven't answered my questions.
1) So then . . what is the "great deal more that you believe?"
2) Does your definition of a brother in Christ include any and all who profess to be Christians, including Arminians and Pentecostals / Charismatics?
3) What about those who profess to be Christians and belong to so-called "mega churches?"
Are they your brothers in Christ?
And inasmuch as you are unwilling to answer my questions, neither will I answer yours.
You’re getting nothing more from me. Try baiting someone else who’s prepared to play your silly games.

News Item2/4/19 11:31 AM
Take heed  Find all comments by Take heed
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
65
comments
June A. Nadolny wrote:
No sir, you haven't answered my questions.
So then . . what is the "great deal more that you believe?"
Does your definition of a brother in Christ include any and all who profess to be Christians, including Arminians and Pentecostals / Charismatics?
What about those who profess to be Christians and belong to so-called "mega churches?"
Are they your brothers in Christ?
Actually I have answered your questions. So quit wasting my time.

Now how about you answer my questions?

John MacArthur has a mega church. Do you believe that no one who attends there is a genuine believer? Are they not brothers in Christ?

Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7


Bill Parker
Keys to Christian Living

Romans 8:1
Sunday Service
Eager Avenue Grace Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS


Tom Gabbard
Called Unto Glory

Reformed Baptist Fellowship
Sunday Service
Play! | MP3

E. A. Johnston
The Conversion Of..

Evangelistic Message
Evangelism Awakening
Play! | MP3

Event: Oct 11-13, 2019
2019 Springfield Bible Conference

"The Glory of Christ"
Conference
Faith Bible Church

Sponsor: Pioneer Missions *FREE* through Sept 2
https://www.amazon.com/Pion..

SPONSOR | 12,900+

SPONSOR




                   
God assures us of a future that is better than all our past. ... J. C. Stern


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Watch
Android
Church App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts
2-MINUTE TIPS

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
SA Newsroom
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES
Sermon Dashboard | Info
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Listen Line
Events Support
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards
Business Cards
SOLO Sites
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Goodies
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Auto-Upload Sermons
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox
Picasa
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Privacy Policy | Support Us | Stories