So he wants Christians to care for the poor? Frankie , the early Protestant Christian Church has cared for the poor by encouraging Liberty and Justice for all. I have learned that if you donât want to be poor, heed his effective call and claim Christ as your savior, youâll be richer than the white dreesed men in Vanican City, youâll be in heaven and they wonât.
Take heed wrote: John UK is a divisive character who speaks out of both sides of his mouth ...
Q: where do you believe John differs in doctrine to Spurgeon?
"Only Vultures would be circling for bones as one would think he was 'suddenly' an apostate by all the clamour. He makes simple challenges to some posters who maintain that they are biblicists...show me the men who preach the same and the churches that do likewise and he could show you thousands on SermonAudio that hold to the same doctrine as himself, including the founder of SermonAudio. He doesn't hide the fact where he stands ... J C Ryle's evangelistic preaching and where he believes the 1689 confession is scriptural. So he will be sadly missed. 'And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you.' Eph 4:32
Just to clarify, you put words into my mouth as I clearly didn't call anyone a vulture or say any had said John was an apostate, but directing that the clamour was over the top, as less has been made over apostates, hence the scripture, before it DID BECOME picking at bones as though he was an apostate!
Would you care to answer the rest of the post so I can understand why you think he is divisive etc. thank y
Message for the modern Anglican-Episcopalian Liberals .....
âBeware of manufacturing a God of your own: a God who is all mercy, but not just; a God who is all love, but not holy; a God who has a heaven for every body, but a hell for none; a God who can allow good and bad to be side by side in time, but will make no distinction between good and bad in eternity. Such a God is an idol of your own, as truly an idol as any snake or crocodile in an Egyptian temple. The hands of your own fancy and sentimentality have made him. He is not the God of the Bible, and beside the God of the Bible there is no God at all.â = (J.C. Ryle)
June A. Nadolny wrote: I wonder why take heed posted these sermons in 2012
That wasn't me. Sometimes people end up using previously used monikers. Happens.
Why are you playing the Devil's part here, constantly accusing everyone of everything under the sun?
UPS, thanks. Exactly what I'm thinking. She has an agenda and it's not nice. She clearly lives by contradictions which she's not prepared to explain to anyone. She's just another unaccountable professor of religion!
âDo nothing that you would not like God to see. Say nothing you would not like God to hear. Write nothing you would not like God to read. Go no place where you would not like God to find you. Read no book of which you would not like God to say, "Show it to Me." Never spend your time in such a way that you would not like to have God say, "What are you doing?â =(J.C. Ryle)
""By reading the Bible with the methods of queer and trans theoretical approaches, this class destabilizes the long held assumptions about the Bible""
Satan will do anything to kill the Bible message in modern western society.
But this is just another of his scams to destroy the church and Christian witness.
Poor old Satan he is already defeated and heading for the prophetic lake of fire....
And so are his followers who write and study ignorant and blind courses like these.
Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire."
""several far-left organizations are using media outlets to amplify a smear campaign against a judge based on his Christianity.""
The satanic 'Left' getting into hostile mode against Christians yet again.
Communists, Marxists, Socialists, Liberalists, And the Democrat Party are Lefty seditionists who attack anything which does not agree with their puerile ideologies. They are known to be afraid of Biblical Christianity because they are ruled by sin.
Jude :10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves."
Gal 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God."
June A. Nadolny wrote: Website: Stop Baptist Predators Blogspot http://stopbaptistpredators.blogspot.com/2017/ Blog Entry of Christa Brown of JANUARY 25, 2017 - continued - Backward steps in 2016 Despite the decade's many gains, 2016 was a year in which that âhopelessâ word often took hold in my head. Not only was there the continuing flood of clergy abuse cases with the same awful patterns of cover-ups and do-nothingness, but there were also institutional decisions that made the Baptist badlands seem even bleaker. For starters, in 2016, the Southern Baptist Convention, this countryâs largest Protestant faith group, elected a known clergy sex abuse cover-upper as its president. It was as though the cover-up of child sex crimes had rendered the pastor promotion-worthy rather than making him subject to accountability. The Baptist General Convention of Texas, the largest statewide Baptist denominational entity, announced that it was abolishing its confidential file of abusive ministers. Though the BGCTâs public relations people spun this as a positive, survivors saw it for what it was -- a step backwards. - to be continued
I wonder what her agenda is in posting all this up on this thread?
Blog Entry of Christa Brown of JANUARY 25, 2017 - continued -
Backward steps in 2016
Despite the decade's many gains, 2016 was a year in which that âhopelessâ word often took hold in my head. Not only was there the continuing flood of clergy abuse cases with the same awful patterns of cover-ups and do-nothingness, but there were also institutional decisions that made the Baptist badlands seem even bleaker.
For starters, in 2016, the Southern Baptist Convention, this countryâs largest Protestant faith group, elected a known clergy sex abuse cover-upper as its president. It was as though the cover-up of child sex crimes had rendered the pastor promotion-worthy rather than making him subject to accountability. The Baptist General Convention of Texas, the largest statewide Baptist denominational entity, announced that it was abolishing its confidential file of abusive ministers. Though the BGCTâs public relations people spun this as a positive, survivors saw it for what it was -- a step backwards.
June A. Nadolny wrote: take heed . . With respect to Spurgeon's comments commending RC Mystic âMadame Guyonâ, you give excuses, you make allowances, you show deference but With respect to John-UK, your professed âbrother in Christâ who also commended RC Mystic âMadame Guyonâ, you pronounce an unqualified censure
I see you have real problems understanding this thread, so let me make this very simple for you.
Spurgeon was wrong in his assessment of Guyon and if he were still alive, I would criticise him also. Difference is that Spurgeon would have been open to reassess his opinion and would have repented. John is nothing like Spurgeon either in attitude or knowledge.
If I am critical of both, how am I a respecter of persons?
You on the other hand can condemn Guyon but justify those who commend her! Not wise.
I'm glad you're done. Does this mean you'll now abandon the topic? Somehow I doubt that your appetite for being divisive will allow it.
take heed . . With respect to Spurgeon's comments commending RC Mystic âMadame Guyonâ, you give excuses, you make allowances, you show deference
With respect to John-UK, your professed âbrother in Christâ who also commended RC Mystic âMadame Guyonâ, you pronounce an unqualified censure
You apply one standard to C. H. Spurgeon and quite another to John-UK and not unlike the Pharisees you justify yourself in so doing.
But God is no ârespecter of personsâ
You call John-UK your brother in Christ, yet your harsh treatment of him proves otherwise. Your graceless public censure and scathing denunciation of John-UK is undeservedly harsh, lacking empathy and devoid of Christian love.
Galatians 6:1 "Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted."
As I said . . I am convinced you have a personal grudge against John-UK,
Douglas Fir wrote: Not to worry, train fans! When the Green New Deal passes, there will be no airlines, no air traffic, and no cars, so the only way to get around will be by trains, or walking
Amish Paradise time (Weird Al Yankovic novelty song). Though to be sure, some Anabaptists use cell phones, borrowed power harvesters, other people's vehicles, etc. One learns interesting things when visiting Lancaster County. They also harvest tobacco.
Just as in other churches, they have had serious differences of opinion. Should their buggies be black or gray? Can State authorities force them to put taillights and Slow Vehicle signs in back?
Still, I have to give them credit for some things: I saw a one-room Dunker schoolhouse with bicycles left unlocked outside. That could never happen at most American schools.
June A. Nadolny wrote: you're a respecter of persons.
Not at all. Spurgeon has been in glory for a long time and does not need any censure from me. He knows better now. John UK is a divisive character who speaks out of both sides of his mouth and refuses to learn. Period.
You will note that since his departure it has been really peaceful here.
You are imitating him and trying to stoke the flames and cause division, which does not reflect well on you.
Why don't you start answering some questions instead of always posing them?
1. Was Spurgeon right in his assessment of Guyon? 2. If so, why do you condemn Guyon? 3. If you condemn Guyon, why do you seek to justify John UK and Spurgeon?
Maybe the reason you (take heed) make allowances for C. H. Spurgeon who commends RC Mystic "Madame Guyon", while pronouncing an severe censure upon John-UK for commending her is because you're a respecter of persons.
or maybe you have a personal grudge against John-UK, whom you regard as your brother in Christ?
June A. Nadolny wrote: These are the words of C. H. Spurgeon, the "prince of preachers" Spurgeon had the greater light
If he had the greater light and was right in his assessment, why do you condemn Guyon?
You wrote 2/20/19 6:30PM
I would NEVER commend her or her works, nor refer to her as a "noble Christian woman".
Maybe you're still thinking through your own position on whether to commend a practicing Roman Catholic who never said that Romanism was wrong doctrinally or otherwise? Can someone who is genuinely born again remain in the Harlot church or remain silent about the gross errors she teaches and promotes? Can such a person genuinely have a closer "mystical" relationship to God than someone who obediently separates from the false church and walks by faith, not by mystical feelings?
Do you know what mysticism teaches or how the RC mystics still teach RC as a valid way to God?
Richards played professionally from 1977 to 1981 when she retired at age 47. She was ranked as high as 20th overall (in February 1979), and her highest ranking at the end of a year was 22nd (in 1977). Her first professional event as a female was the 1977 U.S. Open. Her greatest successes on court were reaching the doubles final at her first U.S. Open in 1977, with Betty Ann Grubb Stuart â the pair lost a close match to Martina Navratilova and Betty StĂ¶ve â and winning the 35-and-over women's singles. Richards was twice a semifinalist in mixed doubles, with Ilie NÄstase, at the U.S. Open. In 1979, she defeated Nancy Richey for the 35-and-over singles title at the Open. Richards posted wins over Hana MandlĂkovĂĄ, Sylvia Hanika, Virginia Ruzici, and Pam Shriver. She later coached Navratilova to twoWimbledon wins.
Richards has since expressed ambivalence about her legacy, and came to believe her past as a man provided her with advantages over her competitors, saying "Having lived for the past 30 years, I know if I'd had surgery at the age of 22, and then at 24 went on the tour, no genetic woman in the world would have been able to come close to me. And so I've reconsidered my opinion."