1,932 active users |
|
|
| Master Ministries International, Inc. |
Tom Hill | Grand Rapids, Michigan
|
|
|
|
 Mark Sandlin wrote an article titled “Clobbering ‘Biblical’ Gay Bashing” in defense of homosexuality. (1) In recent years, this subject has increasingly captured the attention of people of all lifestyles. Sandlin remarked upon attitudes frequently associated with this subject and expanded them to include other issues commonly abbreviated LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transvestite, queer). In his article, he commented upon several passages from the Bible that address same sex issues. Sandlin attempted to deny that these Biblical references had any anti-homosexual or LGBTQ concepts in them. He concluded his article with the assumption that he had clearly proved false all of the references that he analyzed. Any analysis of the Bible must begin with a clear understanding of its message. In it, God reveals himself to mankind. Along with God's self-revelation comes the disclosure of his plan for his creation, including humans. The Bible answers the critical questions that mankind asks themselves. The content of the Bible came from God to humanity through human instruments as directed and inspired by the Holy Spirit. That makes it inerrant and infallible in all matters to which it speaks. It gives us the wisdom of God as well as his commands for his creatures. The Bible describes God's plans and purposes for people like you and me. To accomplish this purpose, God's word comes to us as a meta-story through a variety of writings. The meta-story of the Bible follows an overarching chiasmus: - creation/perfection
- sin/judgment
- old covenant redemptive event
- new covenant redemptive event
- judgment/removal of sin
- consummation/perfection (2)
You cannot interpret the Bible like a cafeteria menu, picking and choosing what you like and rejecting what you do not like. A proper interpretation of the Bible and the interrelationship of one section with another must consider its overarching metastory. Otherwise, misunderstandings and misinterpretations occur. As a result, Sandlin erred in his conclusions, in part, because he failed to follow the Bible’s metastory. Further, because of its self-attesting nature, the Bible stands above human criteria for its veracity. Therefore, it, and it alone, sets the standard(s) by which mankind must live in relationship to God, to creation, and to other humans. (3) Because of the inherited sinful nature that all humanity possesses, we cannot understand the Bible with our own capacities. It appears foolish to us, and we cannot know its meaning. God has provided his Holy Spirit to reveal his message to mankind, so we gain understanding only by revelation to us by God's Spirit. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. 13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. 14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1 Corinthians 2:12-14 (KJV) God has revealed himself to humanity and has made himself plain to them in a variety of ways: the Bible, his son Jesus Christ, and creation. (4) But, the ungodliness and unrighteousness of humans cause us to suppress the truth of God. Yet, those who come to God through faith in Jesus Christ as their savior find forgiveness for sin and reconciliation back to God. He places his Holy Spirit within Christ followers who then have within them the Spirit whom God sent to reveal his word to them. Those readers of this article who have experience God's salvation, know the reality of this truth. If you have not trusted in God's provision for sinners like you and me, his son Jesus Christ, who died as a substitute for people like us, I urge you to trust him today. He will prove to you the certainty of his promises. References 1. To view Mark Sandlin’s article, click here.
2. Grier, James M. “Lecture Notes: Grand Rapids Theological Seminary, Homiletics II”. March 2011.
3. Bahnsen, Greg L. Presuppositional Apologetics, Stated and Defended. The American Vision, Inc., Powder Springs, GA, and Covenant Media Press, Nacogdoches, TX. 2008.
4. Romans 1.18-23; Hebrews 1.1-4. Permissions: You are permitted and encouraged to reproduce and distribute this material in any format, in whole or in part, provided that you do not alter the wording in any way and do not charge a fee beyond the cost of reproduction. For web posting, whether in whole or in part, a link to this document on our website is preferred. Any exceptions to the above must be approved by Tom Hill. Please include the following statement on any distributed copy: By Tom Hill. © Thomas P Hill. Website: www.masterministries.org Personal Information: Tom began writing a newsletter in 1981for a small audience of friends. In 2008, he began to write a blog on his web site. Every month, thousands of visitors from all over the world come to his web site and view his blogs. In 2009, he published the book, Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing, available online at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and his web site, www.masterministries.org (including eBook format). To invite Tom to speak at your college, church or group contact him by email at hill_tom@att.net. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAST BLOG ENTRIES |
|
Mark Burnett and his wife Roma Downey produced the History Channel’s Miniseries blockbuster, The Bible. Millions of viewers have watched the series, perhaps including you, providing it with epic ratings. This dramatic presentation attempted...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Bell publicly confirmed what many concluded from his earlier statements: he affirms gay marriage. “Whether it’s a man and a woman, a woman and a woman, a man and a man — and I think the ship has sailed and I think the church...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
"Progressive Christianity Is As Broken As Evangelicalism: Here’s How to Fix It"In a recent article entitled, “Progressive Christianity Is As Broken As Evangelicalism: Here’s How to Fix It,” Frank Schaeffer highlighted his...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference: Judges 3:1-11After Othniel’s death, we find Israel pursuing sin, choosing idolatry, choosing to intermarry with the children of Canaan instead of among themselves. God had warned them about that. He had warned them that if they...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference: Judges 3:1-11Chapter three of Judges follows Judges one and Judges two. You say, “Well, I know that. I can add. I can follow numbers.” Well, I don’t mention that to check out your mathematics skills. I mention it...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference: Judges 2.14-23When the children of Israel in doubt and disobedience failed to obey God and destroy the people in Canaan and their altars, they ended up just as God said they would. They worshiped the gods about them and joined in the...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Bible Text: Judges 2:1-23“It was the best of times. It was the worst of times.”Does that phrase sound familiar to you? Charles Dickens made that statement famous in his book A Tale of Two Cities. Written in the mid 1800s he...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Bible Text: Judges 1:1-36Big gates swing on little hinges. The first chapter and the rest of the book of Judges describe the severe consequences that Israel suffered because they failed to believe God. It started with their failure to believe that...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Bible Text: Judges 1:1-36Big gates swing on little hinges. You knew that, didn’t you? If you look at a door, you can see along the side usually three hinges, not that big. If you took all of them collectively in contrast to the size of the...[ abbreviated | read entire ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
