

2,674 active users! |
|

|
| Greenville Seminary & Mt. Olive |
Joseph A. Pipa Jr. | Taylors, South Carolina
|
|
This section shows all user comments posted on all sermons, products, blogs, and events for this broadcaster
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Page 1 | Page 2 · Found: 608 total user comment(s) |
 |  |
|
|
7/15/12 1:42 PM |
|
Add new comment
|
Great Sermon! This is deeply sad.
No idea this denomination was in such turmoil. |
|
|
7/11/12 12:50 PM |
| Scott Wilkinson | from Kitchener, Ontario, Canada | |  |  |  |  |
|
Add new comment
|
I Think Schwertley Is Correct In summary, Shaw's argument seems to be: Since we cannot know if the Bible allows for uninspired songs to be sung in worship, we can conclude that we should sing them based on the need for songs that are more clearly understood than the Psalms.
In summary, Schwertley argument is: We have warrant from the Scriptures that we are to sing psalms (and possibly the few other inspired songs in the Bible), but we do not have any warrant in Scripture (by command, example, or necessary deduction), that we may sing uninspired compositions in worship.
I believe Schwertley had a far superior argument. He argued that we can concluded from Scripture that we should sing psalms. Schwertley says, if we don't know from Scripture if we can sing uninspired compositions, then we don't have a warrant from Scripture to sing them. In his opening statement, Shaw admits that we should sing psalms, but then argues that since it is “possible” that Paul was referring to “songs in general” and not just “inspired songs”, we must not be restricted to inspired songs. IOW, since we don't know if we can sing uninspired compositions, we should sing them! |
|
|
5/20/12 7:42 PM |
|
Add new comment
|
This is preaching! Wonderful and glorious preaching. One cannot say they have not understood something of the Gospel and our Lord after such a sermon! |
|
|
3/9/12 4:07 AM |
|
Add new comment
|
Great Sermon! Christians can believe in evolution if they want. But thats not what the majority of the scientific establishment mean when they say evolution. They mean a theory that has no purpose and that does not include God. |
|
|
|
|
|

|

|