members, click to sign in..

5,033 active users!!Bandwidth
WEDNESDAY
SEP 2, 2015
Home
NewsSITE
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
BroadcastersNew Stuff!
Local Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -2 hrs
Top Sermons
VideosPDFs
Daily Log
PhotosNew Stuff!
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Submit Sermon
Members Only

Breaking News Home | All | Religion | Society | Tech | Choice | SA News
FRONT PAGE  |  9/2/2015
WEDNESDAY, DEC 19, 2012  |  166 comments
Ancient Dead Sea Scrolls digitised in co-project by Israel and Google
Anyone with an internet connection will now be able to take a new look into the Biblical past through an online archive of high-resolution images of the 2,000-year-old Dead Sea Scrolls completed by the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) and Google.

The scrolls, most of them on parchment, are the oldest copies of the Hebrew Bible and include secular text dating from the third century BC to the first century AD.

IAA, the custodian of the scrolls that shed light on the life of Jews and early Christians at the time of Jesus, said it has collaborated with Google's research and development centre in Israel for the past two and a half years to upload digitised images of thousands of fragments from the collection.

Yossi Matias, the head of Google-Israel R&D centre, described the project launch as "exciting". ...


CLICK HERE to Read Entire Article
www.telegraph.co.uk

   03/14/15  |  Another One Bites the Dust • 2 comments
   03/11/15  |  God Doesn't Want Matt Chandler to be Your Pastor • 18 comments
   01/08/14  |  Christian Post: Warning, this article may offend many Christians • 93 comments
   01/01/14  |  Michelle Obama praises lesbian TV anchor • 17 comments
   12/29/13  |  U.S. Slams 'Conservative Gender Norms' • 377 comments
MORE RELATED ( ) NEWS | MORE..
   08/31/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Personal Edition of the Gospel of John -- Third... • 6 comments
   08/28/15  |  Polygamists Point to Gay Marriage Ruling to Sanction Their Sin • 25 comments
   08/27/15  |  Slain Christian's head allegedly bashed by Muslim 'refugees' • 6 comments
   08/26/15  |  Abortion video biomedical company tried to block released • 7 comments
   08/25/15  |  Dow plummets, recovers, dives again • 1 comments
OTHER CHOICE NEWS | MORE..
   09/02/15  |  Daily pot smoking on U.S. college campuses at 35-year high: study • 2 comments
   09/02/15  |  Terrorists Caught Crossing Into Europe Posing As Refugees • 3 comments
   09/02/15  |  Judge orders Rowan clerk to appear in court Thursday after she... • 12 comments
   09/02/15  |  Baby parts 'buyer' talks about clinic payoffs • 2 comments
   09/02/15  |  Canada officially enters recession • 2 comments
OTHER RECENT NEWS | MORE..
COMMENTS | show all | add new  
    Sorting Order:  
Page 1 | Page 7 ·  Found: 166 user comment(s)
News Item12/23/12 10:57 AM
John UK | Wales  Find all comments by John UK
Mike wrote:
You know this how, John?
I do not know it Mike, but I believe it. Just the same as I believe that the Son of God "died for the ungodly". Do you know that is true bro, or do you believe it? Why then would you believe something if it is not true? Is that not deception? Did Paul say that "Christ died for the ungodly" or did he not? I say he did. What do you think? Did he say something else? Is the Bible corrupted and our assurance a big deception? I think not! The Bible is true, and I stake my eternal hopes on it. Surely Mike you do the same?

Oh, did I answer the question?

Sure I did. At least I believe I did.

p.s. Mike, without the autographs, nothing about the Bible can be proven, thus it has to be by faith, and you surely know by now it is a God-given faith; and if it is a God-given faith, you also know that God would not bring someone to believe something that wasn't true. But you say, "Surely there have been people who believed they heard from God, but it was not God, it was either their own heart or it was a lying spirit." Precisely, which is why it is so good to have the word of God as a sure word which is black and white and eternal. This alone is our hope - it is in God's promises.

46

News Item12/23/12 10:36 AM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
John UK wrote:
US, this one-liner has been used many times, and still raises a smile. That's fine, but have you considered this? If you took Paul's words in the 1st century NT, and translated them into 17th century English, you would have none other than the King James Version. Or if you took the King James Version and translated Paul's words into greek, you would have the first century words of Paul in greek.
Or don't you believe that?
You know this how, John?
45

News Item12/23/12 5:52 AM
John UK | Wales  Find all comments by John UK
Unprofitable Servant wrote:
The KJV, if it was good enough for the apostle Paul, it is good enough for me
US, this one-liner has been used many times, and still raises a smile. That's fine, but have you considered this? If you took Paul's words in the 1st century NT, and translated them into 17th century English, you would have none other than the King James Version. Or if you took the King James Version and translated Paul's words into greek, you would have the first century words of Paul in greek.

Or don't you believe that?

44

News Item12/23/12 3:05 AM
Observer  Find all comments by Observer
Unprofitable Servant wrote:
The KJV, if it was good enough for the apostle Paul, it is good enough for me
Yep, The Old KJV, King Jesus (The Living Word) Version, It-He Was Indeed Good Enought For The Apostle Paul, -And- He-It Was & Is Good Enough For Me !

And He-It Is Good Enough For You Too !

You See, "In The Beginning Was The Word, And The Word Was With God, And The Word Was (& Still Is) God." John 1:1

"For There Are Three That Bear Record In Heaven, The Father, The Word, And The Holy Ghost: And These Three Are One." 1 John 5:7

"And The Word Was Made Flesh, And Dwelt Among Us [And We Beheld His Glory, The Glory As Of The Only Begotten Of The Father], Full Of Grace And Truth." John 1:14

How The Living Word Came To Be:

"The Holy Ghost Shall Come Upon Thee (Mary), And The Power Of The Highest Shall Overshadow Thee: Therefore Also That Holy Thing Which Shall Be Born Of Thee Shall Be Called
The Son (Word) Of God." Luke 1:35 *See I Tim. 3:16*

How The Written Word Came To Be:

The Holy Ghost Came Upon "Holy Men Of God", And The Power Of The Highest Overshadowed Them: Therefore That Holy Thing Which Was "Bourne" Of Them Shall Be Called (And Is Called) The (Written) Word Of God [The True Holy Scripture(s)-(Bible)]. *See 2 Peter 1:21*

43

News Item12/23/12 2:49 AM
John UK | Wales  Find all comments by John UK
Another point, Lurker, is that the Latin Bible (the Vulgate), before even the first English translations, would have been used of God to lead precious souls into his kingdom, in his providence and grace. The Spirit of God goeth where he will, and quickeneth whom he will, and enlighteneth whom he will. But because faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God, the faithful in England would have been mainly those who understood Latin.

What a shame then that there are still people groups in our world today without a single book of the Bible in their own language. For them, it is still the dark ages, while publishers of more and more English versions keep churning them out hoping to make some more profit. Thankfully, the Trinitarian Bible Society has worked tirelessly to translate the Bible into more and more languages for the benefit of people and the glory of God, regardless of cost, being supported by Christians who actually care about men and women and children the world over who are currently in the darkness of nature's night, and who know nothing of Jesus.

42

News Item12/23/12 12:05 AM
Lurker  Protected NameFind all comments by Lurker
item3 wrote:
None of these were used to the extent which God used the King James Version over these centuries.
What does "extent" of use by God have to do with anything? Don't you agree that all the English translations leading up to the KJV served God's purpose in their time, leading precious souls into the Kingdom of God, and were His workmanship?
item3 wrote:
The point made below is the comparison between the KJV and the modern versions.
OK. No argument. But you must be more careful about making broad brush statements; eg. "Since God brought HIS Word into english in 1611 perfectly preserved...." which implies that either there were no English translations before 1611 or that the English translations prior to 1611 were not perfectly preserved.
41

News Item12/22/12 11:55 PM
Unprofitable Servant | Georgia  Find all comments by Unprofitable Servant
The KJV, if it was good enough for the apostle Paul, it is good enough for me
40

News Item12/22/12 9:27 PM
Christopher000 | Rhode Island  Find all comments by Christopher000
Yikes...I am going to have to read through the posts a few times. Honestly, I thought most of you were King James only until now. So you are saying that God has been preserving His word all along no matter what translation/version and that all are of sound doctrine?
I guess that I've had this all wrong unless I haven't made sense of the responses yet. I'll stick with the KJ since I'm familiar with it and like it.
The Pastor that I referenced earlier did some verse comparisons between the KJ, the NIV, as well as some others and the meanings were completly changed. I will have to dig them up and post them.
Thank you very much for the responses.
39

News Item12/22/12 6:45 PM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
item3 wrote:
None of these were used to the extent which God used the King James Version over these centuries.
Remember how God describes all of us ......
"As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:" Romans 3:10.
So lets honour God not men!!
The point made below is the comparison between the KJV and the modern versions.
So the 400 years of use of the KJV makes it automatically of God to the exclusion of anything else, because, well, 400 years is such a long time, don't you know. Let's see, if with the Lord a thousand years is as one day, could we not say 400 years is as 9.6 hours? This doesn't do much to convince of the importance of the time factor in the argument.
38

News Item12/22/12 5:59 PM
item3  Find all comments by item3
Lurker wrote:
John Wycliff's manuscript bibles, William Tyndale's NT, John Rogers Bible, Miles Coverdale's Bible, the Great Bible, The Geneva Bible, The Bishop's Bible, The Douay Rheims Bible..... all before 1611, were what? Something other than God's word in English?
None of these were used to the extent which God used the King James Version over these centuries.

Remember how God describes all of us ......
"As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:" Romans 3:10.

So lets honour God not men!!

The point made below is the comparison between the KJV and the modern versions.

37

News Item12/22/12 5:46 PM
John UK | Wales  Find all comments by John UK
Lurker wrote:
Could be, John. But I rather think item3 meant following in the footsteps of Jim from Lincoln eg. modern versionist. I really don't know how he would have gotten that idea since my objection to his comment pointed out all the English translation which preceded the 1611 KJV. Hardly modern.
But apparently item3 isn't a regular here for if he were he would know that I am a KJV user myself but far from an onlyist.
I'm with you bro on this. Being an Ingleesi myself, I hold very dear the memory of our brave and valiant brothers who began to shine the light in darkest England, bringing the word of God to the attention of the populace. Until their efforts, the only Bible was in Latin, which only the monks were able to read.

Dangerous work!

Unlike the super-suited executives who for filthy lucre today will keep bringing out more and more versions, hoping to dupe the populace into spending their dosh on another Bible which will not benefit them at all.

36

News Item12/22/12 5:36 PM
Lurker  Protected NameFind all comments by Lurker
John UK wrote:
Robin Hood, Little John, Friar Tuck, Maid Marian et al.
Could be, John. But I rather think item3 meant following in the footsteps of Jim from Lincoln eg. modern versionist. I really don't know how he would have gotten that idea since my objection to his comment pointed out all the English translations which preceded the 1611 KJV. Hardly modern.

Apparently item3 isn't a regular here for if he were he would know that I am a KJV user myself but far from an onlyist.

35

News Item12/22/12 5:21 PM
John UK | Wales  Find all comments by John UK
Lurker wrote:
What's a Lincolnite?
Robin Hood, Little John, Friar Tuck, Maid Marian et al.
34

News Item12/22/12 5:00 PM
Lurker  Protected NameFind all comments by Lurker
Frank wrote:
Hello Ember! See John woke Jim up. It is his fault and not mine. However, you once again made me go to "google" for Ruckmanite. Your logic is good, I also used the expression "perfectly preserved", but I meant that all doctrines were perfectly preserved. Sorry if I added to the confusion.
Hey Frank,

John may have awoken Jim but my bone of contention was with "item3". Not too many things rile me up any more but slighting God's servants in the transmission of the English bible is one of them.

"However, you once again made me go to "google" for Ruckmanite."

Stick around, Frank. John and I will bring you into the 21st century.

item3 wrote:
No! But tell me are you a Lincolnite?
Do you expect a straight answer to a crooked question?

What's a Lincolnite?

33

News Item12/22/12 4:58 PM
item3  Find all comments by item3
Lurker wrote:
Are you a Ruckmanite?
No! But tell me are you a Lincolnite?
32

News Item12/22/12 4:53 PM
Frank  Contact via emailFind all comments by Frank
Lurker wrote:
John Wycliff's manuscript bibles, William Tyndale's NT, John Rogers Bible, Miles Coverdale's Bible, the Great Bible, The Geneva Bible, The Bishop's Bible, The Douay Rheims Bible..... all before 1611, were what? Something other than God's word in English?
Were there no English speaking born again Christians before 1611?
Are you a Ruckmanite?
Hello Ember! See John woke Jim up. It is his fault and not mine. However, you once again made me go to "google" for Ruckmanite. Your logic is good, I also used the expression "perfectly preserved", but I meant that all doctrines were perfectly preserved. Sorry if I added to the confusion.
31

News Item12/22/12 4:52 PM
Lurker  Protected NameFind all comments by Lurker
Could be, Jim.

But I find it quite disrespectful to God as well as the Godly men He raised up long before the KJV to begin the long process of recovering His preserved word from the iron fisted grip of the RCC and put it into the hands of the plowboy.

Multitudes paid the ultimate price for a vernacular bible, free from the dictates of church and state, with their own blood and, as a matter of historical fact, that first came to pass in 1560. To imply that none of these sacrifices counted and it all began with the 1611 KJV is to fail to recognize God's work in the Protestant Reformation and what He accomplished for His people.

30

News Item12/22/12 4:18 PM
Jim Lincoln | Nebraska  Find all comments by Jim Lincoln
Lurker, perhaps the gentleman did what I do, all too often, when using a negation for a positive or vice-versa, probably meant "imperfectly," preserved. Because no doubt he would know that the translators didn't think their work was perfect or couldn't be improved upon, The Preface to the King James Version And the King James Only position (PDF).
29

News Item12/22/12 4:15 PM
John UK | Wales  Find all comments by John UK
Megan Ottow wrote:
God forbid!
This is how it goes, Megan:

John: Is that NASB you use inerrant, Jim?

Jim: No, John.

John: So it has mistakes in it?

Jim: Yes.

John: Do you know where those mistakes are, so that you can correct them and produce a perfect Bible?

Jim: No.

John: So if I read a verse in the NASB, I do not know if it is true, or if it is a mistake?

Jim: Correct.

Sure, this is what ALL the MV's believe and say.

28

News Item12/22/12 4:13 PM
Lurker  Protected NameFind all comments by Lurker
item3 wrote:
Since God brought HIS Word into english in 1611 perfectly preserved....
John Wycliff's manuscript bibles, William Tyndale's NT, John Rogers Bible, Miles Coverdale's Bible, the Great Bible, The Geneva Bible, The Bishop's Bible, The Douay Rheims Bible..... all before 1611, were what? Something other than God's word in English?

Were there no English speaking born again Christians before 1611?

Are you a Ruckmanite?

27
There are a total of 166 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments
Page 1 | Jump to Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 | last
Last PostTotal
Baby parts 'buyer' talks about clinic payoffs
wayfairer pilgrim from lubbock,tx: "hilary clinton has been awarded the margret..."
-2 hrs 
Women should dress modestly or expect to ‘entice a rapist’ –...
unprofitable servant from georgia: " just the facts all is well, friend. thank..."
-2 hrs 52 
World's oldest Bible to go on display in British Museum
b. mccausland: " moses lucifer—or ‘morning star' ... having only one..."
-3 hrs 96 


Knoxville-Powell, TN
Temple Baptist Church

Play! | More

Norman Lourenco
When Jesus Passes By

Sunday, June 21, 2015
Sunday - AM
Twin Lakes Baptist Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS

A Ministry of Sharing
William Boekestein

Rev. John S. Mahon
Pt 1: A Divine Covenant

SA Marriage 2015
Grace Community...
Play! | MP3

Kevin Swanson
Examining Donald Trump

Moral and Economic Failures
Generations Radio
Play! | MP3

Sponsor:
New Study Bible w/ Biblical Theology

D. A. Carson is the gen­eral editor of the new NIV Zond­ervan Study Bible built on...
www.unpackinggodsstory.com

Sponsor:
Commentary on Zechariah
doctorwoodhead.com/commenta..

SPONSOR | 2,400+

SPONSOR




                   
The promises are made to encourage faith, not to cherish sloth. ... Robert Hawker

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal
MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Android
Church App
Kindle + Nook
Chromecast TV
ROKU TV
BlackBerry
Windows Mobile
Apple Watch
Pebble Smartwatch
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices New!
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES | ALL
Local Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Podcasting
Video Support
Live Webcasting
Transcription Service
Business Cards
SOLO | MINI Sites
Domain Redirect
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Auto-Upload Sermons
Auto-Blog Import
Picasa | FTP | Dropbox
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us!
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Support Us | Testimonials