Neil Armstrong, first man to step on the moon, dies at 82
Neil Armstrong, the astronaut who marked an epochal achievement in exploration with “one small step” from the Apollo 11 lunar module on July 20, 1969, becoming the first person to walk on the moon, died Aug. 25 in the Cincinnati area. He was 82.
His family announced the death in a statement and attributed it to “complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures.”
r.gr wrote: If you knew it wouldnt impress why use it. would it be usefull in any case.with a budget of 4 trillion you would think you have one test dont you? you might get arockets to work -vacuum but does it produce thrust?
The reason has already been given below, by Lurker.
You ignored my experimental challenge. I dare you to PROVE what you claim, using a method such as I described. Otherwise, you're just another pseudoscientific snake-oil peddler.
r.gr wrote: If you knew it wouldnt impress why use it....case.with a budget of 4 trillion you would think you have one test dont you? you might get arockets to work -vacuum but does it produce thrust? Lurker why so many? one good reason is money and lots of it.the root of all evil is the love of money.not only that they are trying to find a way out of Gods presence. Dont i remember NASA loosing 2 trillion some where..hmm 2 trillion do you know how much money that is nasas budget is 4 trillion for what? Ps 1 tell me there is a conspircy agaisnt God. That religion that fights against Gods people is Freemasonary the worship of satan, every president has been one, the queen phillip charles every leader in the world today belongs to this secreat society every media owned by the same people Reuters, our murdoch is a known mason, why do you think we are bombarded in every nation about gay agenda its the same club. Mike the media is not hostile its may appear to you as being but its not Big companies own the world BIG banks. I was like you guys when 911 a plane hit your towers ... But it was fake my proof a soft nose plane engines & all threw a b?. & buid 7. cont
who first... If you knew it wouldnt impress why use it. would it be usefull in any case.with a budget of 4 trillion you would think you have one test dont you? you might get arockets to work -vacuum but does it produce thrust?
Lurker why so many? one good reason is money and lots of it.the root of all evil is the love of money.not only that they are trying to find a way out of Gods presence. Dont i remember NASA loosing 2 trillion some where..hmm 2 trillion do you know how much money that is nasas budget is 4 trillion for what? Ps 1 tell me there is a conspircy agaisnt God. That religion that fights against Gods people is Freemasonary the worship of satan, every president has been one, the queen phillip charles every leader in the world today belongs to this secreat society every media is owned by the same people Reuters, our murdoch is a known mason, why do you think we are bombarded in every nation about gay agenda its the same club. Mike the media is not hostile its may appear to you as being but its not Big companies own the world BIG banks. I was like you guys when 911 a plane hit your towers as the tv showed me. But it was fake my proof a soft nose plane engines & all threw a b?. & buid 7. cont
r.gr wrote: I didnt have time to put that in it(newton law is mis applied if u r reffering to a vacuum as well as here).its pushing against the atmosphare not nothing in every direction i might add shawly, think) doesnt it?
I knew that posted video wouldn't impress you.
If you're so sure your theory is correct & the rest of the world is wrong, then it doesn't take a NASA-sized budget to prove it. All you have to do is find a liter-sized bottle capable of withstanding evacuation, a seal for it, a pump which can suck the air out, a thrust device such as those used in model rocketry (or failing that, a CO2 cartridge), threads to hang it on, & a way to ignite it through the bottle's seal.
This is something any reasonably dedicated amateur could do. Impress us all & post a video of it.
r.gr wrote: --- yes the gasses are expanding rapidly out of one end of the rocket, but they are expanding every into a vacuum, this vacuum is 'sucking' on the gasses as quick as they expand so the net result is zero force in one direction.
I think you might have to explain the point of it all, if it be just smoke and mirrors. Or for that matter, how it could possibly be hidden from a hostile media that loves to tear down.
r.gr wrote: yes the gasses are expanding rapidly out of one end of the rocket, but they are expanding every into a vacuum, this vacuum is 'sucking' on the gasses as quick as they expand so the net result is zero force in one direction.
Great to hear from you too, old friend.
It seems to me that if you are being objective, you would require the same measure of proof to believe this theory as you are asking for to believe jet propulsion works in a vacuum. Do you have such proof?
But all that aside, if space exploration, manned or unmanned, is nothing more than a hoax (and it would be if there was no way to navigate a spaceship beyond Earth's atmosphere; i.e. no jet propulsion in a vacuum), I would have to ask what motivates so many nations to participate in the hoax. Or has NASA fooled them as well?
"The International Space Station is one of the most ambitious international collaborations ever attempted. The largest space station ever constructed, the ISS continues to be assembled in orbit.
United States - NASA Canada - CSA Japan - JAXA Russia - Roscosmos Belgium Denmark - DNSC France - CNES Germany - DLR Italy - ASI Netherlands Norway - NSC Spain - INTA Sweden - SNSB Switzerland United Kingdom "
Hi buddy great to hear from you again. I didnt have time to put that in it(newton law is mis applied if u r reffering to a vacuum as well as here).its pushing against the atmosphare not nothing in every direction i might add shawly, think) doesnt it? also thats my point and not just mine or so called looneys lol. Newton is wrong on that point if u mean thats in space as well. Prove to me not via like a picture that neil provided of wallace & gommit going to the moon. but a real test..I use to beleive as you do until little over 5 years ago isntead of laughing and making fun of them as i did at people who challanged me with the very same arguments which is just what i had been taught and said look at the tv its real, but when it came to actualy, test there is none.well none as of now still do u have one , one. doest that send alarm bell to your mind.What there not one tangable test that shows a rocket working in a vacuum?That even NASA say they have all their satalites and shuttle in low orbit atmosphare?
yes the gasses are expanding rapidly out of one end of the rocket, but they are expanding every into a vacuum, this vacuum is 'sucking' on the gasses as quick as they expand so the net result is zero force in one direction.
R.gr wrote: neil, neil , neil thats not a test so thats your truth? ever asked your self where is the videos testd for a rocket working in a vacuum? and mike you need more proof than the word physics, your not going to tell me that in a vacuum it pushes against itself?? duh or curiosity can slow down from 12000 mph with a parachute yer right when the atmosphare of mars is .01 of earths. No i believe what i am told by nasa they wouldnt lie, tv showed me.. whats logical. any video tests of this shute working... ah no..anamation only or for security reasons lol. its like trying to stop a shooting star with a shute!!Imposible. here rover catch... but you guys are brainer than me thats fine. show me the evedence real evedence tests real science tests not some movie neil. neil or mike show and i will be happy repent
OK, Remo, get ready to repent.
Newton's Third Law.... "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction."
The "action" is the force of the exaust gases and the "reaction" is the same force applied against the mass of the rocket and its payload. The vacuum of space doesn't enter into the equation.
Neil wrote: www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMBcLg0DkLA&feature=related (about 50s into the clip) But why would a skeptic about the moon landings, or the space program in general, accept any video as evidence?
neil, neil , neil thats not a test so thats your truth? ever asked your self where is the videos testd for a rocket working in a vacuum? and mike you need more proof than the word physics, your not going to tell me that in a vacuum it pushes against itself?? duh or curiosity can slow down from 12000 mph with a parachute yer right when the atmosphare of mars is .01 of earths. No i believe what i am told by nasa they wouldnt lie, tv showed me.. whats logical. any video tests of this shute working... ah no..anamation only or for security reasons lol. its like trying to stop a shooting star with a shute!!Imposible. here rover catch... but you guys are brainer than me thats fine. show me the evedence real evedence tests real science tests not some movie neil. neil or mike show and i will be happy repent
R.gr wrote: NO! Your name is not fall is it? fall for anything. Show me one video where a rocket works in a vaccum and Ill believe you!!!Or no tv told me so...
Alexander The Least wrote: Internal Intelligence Records Have Already Confirmed Man Was On (That Is, Man Colonized) The Earth's Only Moon Long Before July 20, 1969. Even The "Scrubbed" Lunar Photos Taken By NASA Before The 1960s Confirm That Man, Probably The Russians If Not The Americans, Had Already Built Cities On The "Dark"-Side Of Earth's Moon Decades BEFORE The Neil Armstrong 1969-Moon-Landing "Cover-Up" !
Oh I get it Alex; Your getting your facts from the original moon landing [technical] information which came from; "A Trip to the Moon or Voyage to the Moon (French: Le Voyage dans la lune) is a 1902 French black-and-white silent science fiction film. It is based loosely on two popular novels of the time: Jules Verne's From the Earth to the Moon and H. G. Wells' The First Men in the Moon."
Since Australia & New Zealand Have A Freer Press Than The U.S.A.,
I Would Say R.gr Has A Very Logical & Reasonable Point. Internal Intelligence Records Have Already Confirmed Man Was On (That Is, Man Colonized) The Earth's Only Moon Long Before July 20, 1969.
Even The "Scrubbed" Lunar Photos Taken By NASA Before The 1960s Confirm That Man, Probably The Russians If Not The Americans, Had Already Built Cities On The "Dark"-Side Of Earth's Moon Decades BEFORE The Neil Armstrong 1969-Moon-Landing "Cover-Up" !
But Then, Don't Tell Your Friends The Whole 1969-Moon-Landing Was A "Cover-Up": It Might Destroy Their Faith In The U.S. GOVERNMENT Never Being Wrong, Liars &-Or Wholesale Deceivers !
Especially With The Pseudo-President NOW Sitting In The Oval Office At The White House !
And The Pseudo-Conservative Republican Now Waiting In The Wings To Occupy Washington's Chief Mansion & House Of HOGWASH !
Neil Armstrong Probably Didn't Make Much Money After Being The Poster-Boy For THE 1969-LUNAR-FALLACY--But He Did KEEP His MOUTH SHUT Regarding It's Grand COVER-UP Of Who REALLY Landed & Colonized Earth's Moon's "DARK"-SIDE:
AS OTHERS STILL HAVE LOCK-JAW ON GLOBALISMS' EVIL DARK SIDE !
NOTE:"mike/new york's" Faith Is Built On Nothing Less Than Cheese & N-W-O DUNG !
Alexander The Least wrote: Since Australia & New Zealand Have A Freer Press Than The U.S.A., I Would Say R.gr Has A Very Logical & Reasonable Point. Internal Intelligence Records Have Already Confirmed Man Was On (That Is, Man Colonized) The Earth's Only Moon Long Before July 20, 1969. Even The "Scrubbed" Lunar Photos Taken By NASA Before The 1960s Confirm That Man, Probably The Russians If Not The Americans, Had Already Built Cities On The "Dark"-Side Of Earth's Moon Decades BEFORE The Neil Armstrong 1969-Moon-Landing "Cover-Up" ! ---
That's silly. Everyone knows you can't build cities on foundations of cheese.
R.gr wrote: which moon did he land? in hollywood maybe.
Since Australia & New Zealand Have A Freer Press Than The U.S.A., I Would Say R.gr Has A Very Logical & Reasonable Point.
Internal Intelligence Records Have Already Confirmed Man Was On (That Is, Man Colonized) The Earth's Only Moon Long Before July 20, 1969.
Even The "Scrubbed" Lunar Photos Taken By NASA Before The 1960s Confirm That Man, Probably The Russians If Not The Americans, Had Already Built Cities On The "Dark"-Side Of Earth's Moon Decades BEFORE The Neil Armstrong 1969-Moon-Landing "Cover-Up" !
But Then, Don't Tell Your Friends The Whole 1969-Moon-Landing Was A "Cover-Up": It Might Destroy Their Faith In The U.S. GOVERNMENT Never Being Wrong, Liars &-Or Wholesale Deceivers !
Especially With The Pseudo-President NOW Sitting In The Oval Office At The White House !
And The Pseudo-Conservative Republican Now Waiting In The Wings To Occupy Washington's Chief Mansion & House Of HOGWASH !
Neil Armstrong Probably Didn't Make Much Money After Being The Poster-Boy For THE 1969-LUNAR-FALLACY--But He Did KEEP His MOUTH SHUT Regarding It's Grand COVER-UP Of Who REALLY Landed & Colonized Earth's Moon's "DARK"-SIDE:
*AS OTHERS STILL HAVE LOCK-JAW ON GLOBALISMS' EVIL DARK SIDE !
Rev. John Greer | 12/6/2009
COMMENTS | 
