Top-rated radio host Rush Limbaugh, upset that he's forced to report his every movement to tax authorities, blasted President Obama for failing to prove he is natural-born citizen of the United States.
On his show today, Limbaugh told listeners, "As you know, I'm in the midst of another harassing audit from New York State and New York City for the last three years. We're up to 16 different ways I have to prove to New York City and state tax authorities where I have been every day ‚Äď not just work week ‚Äď but every day, for the past three years."
He continued, "Barack Obama has yet to have to prove that he's a citizen. All he has to do is show a birth certificate. He has yet to have to prove he's a citizen. I have to show them 14 different ways where the h--- I am every day of the year for three years."...
I'm told John Kerry wouldn't release his transcripts because his grades were lower than Bush's. Too embarrassing. What else, besides evidence of foriegn birth, could be on such a doccument that would cause Obama to be so reluctant to realease his birth records?
djc49 wrote: Those of you "out there" who believe that Barack H. Obama is unqualified for the office of POTUS due to his NOT being a "natural born citizen" need to READ THIS! It's really a non-issue. And you people do not have a good argument.
One faulty argument makes one wonder how many others exist in READ THIS.
Here's the argument:
"A few facets of this claim jump out as far-fetched: first, that a sitting US Senator who has already spent a good deal of time and money securing his party's nomination for the presidency would suddenly be discovered as ineligible due to an obscure provision of US law.."
The reference to his being a US Senator is irrelevant, in terms of providing support for the argument, since the citizenship requirement for Senator is that he must be a US citizen for at least 9 years at the time of election. IOW, he doesn't have to be born here, whereas the president does.
As for the "spent a good deal of time and money" aspect, this might mean something in the National Enquirer, but not in the law.
You might not like it, Mike, but there is no support for civilian rebellion in the Bible. It makes me rather glad the American Revolution were either not Christian at all or very poor ones.
You mean, Limbaugh didn't make any charges on this one? I accidentally tuned him probably not more than a week ago, and he was ranting about something. He's an entertainer who I hope has gotten through with his drug rehab?
I think I only had to have my birth certificate once or twice in my life, and yes, I'm a native born American.
Anyway, the courts have already decided that Obama is qualified to be President, case closed, and won't be reopened again until there's compelling evidence to do so. So, at the present time, Obama is innocent until proven guilty of not being an American citizen or ineligible to hold the office of President.
Caesar was the law in his day. Therefore another way to say it would be "render unto the law (Caesar in his day / The Constitution in ours) as the law says".....Our law says a person shall be a citizen to be president.
Jim Lincoln wrote: --- I understand the Obama team rather have Limbaugh as point man for the Republicans because he is so disliked. If Limbaugh has proof of his charges have him take it to court. It seems like one court case has already failed on this matter, though. Apparently Limbaugh needs a copy of Rendering To Caesar: A Biblical Perspective On Government.
Hey Jim, If you have proof of your charges against Limbaugh, you should take him to court. As for me, I heard what he said. He made no charges against Obama, just a statement that Obama had not proven he was a natural-born citizen of the US. If you know otherwise, a reference to the source would be useful. I've had to produce an actual birth certificate for lesser things than be president. How about you?
And your harping about rendering to Caesar has no bearing on this anyway. Unless you think anyone claiming to be Caesar should have us bow before him.
Well, Tony, I don't know how long ago, I stopped listening to this bombastic entertainer. Probably during the first Clinton campaign. Limbaugh's one note harping about the Clinton, --almost-- made me feel sympathetic, towards Clinton. If I didn't stop listening to Limbaugh, I might have voted for Clinton! I understand the Obama team rather have Limbaugh as point man for the Republicans because he is so disliked.
Although I'm Personally NO Fan Of Rush Limbaugh; I & Over 100 Million U.S. Citizens & Registered Voters--Not To Mention Constitutional Conservatives & NATIONALISTIC U.S. CONSTITUTION BOUND Patriots--Agree 100% With Mr. Limbaugh's Lamentation:
"OBAMA HAS YET TO PROVE HE'S A (NATURAL BORN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) CITIZEN" ! ! !
I Previously Mentioned In Another Sermonaudio News Article That I Myself Was Physically Born In The Chicago Hyde Park Neighborhood (@ 64th & Kenwood) That QUACK "U.S. President" Barack Hussein Obama Has Made His "Home Away From Home"! ! !
The Only Difference Between Him & I, Though, Is That I'm A TRUE U.S. American Natural Born Citizen (I'm NOT A Natural Born KENYAN Citizen Like Barack Hussein Obama IS): And Have An Original Birth Certificate & Birth/Education Records To PROVE IT ! ! !
I'M OUTRAGED, AS A TRUE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE U.S.A., THAT A U.S. CONSTITUTIONALLY ILLEGAL "FOREIGNER" & CRIMINAL "ALIEN" HAS SEDITIOUSLY & TREASONOUSLY INVADED, USURPED & POSED HIMSELF AS A "LEGITIMATE" PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ! ! !
THIS U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL SEDITIOUS, TREASONOUS & FELONIOUS "HIGH CRIME" AND-OR "HIGH MISDEMEANOR" MUST BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT THAT THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & FEDERAL LAW OBLIGATES & PERMITS ! ! !