members, click to sign in..

5,971 active users!!Bandwidth
SUNDAY
AUG 2, 2015
Home
NewsSITE
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
Broadcasters
Local Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -2 min
Top Sermons
VideosPDFs
Daily Log
PhotosNew Stuff!
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Submit Sermon
Members Only

Breaking News Home | All | Religion | Society | Tech | Choice | SA News
FRONT PAGE  |  8/2/2015
Choice News SUNDAY, AUG 26, 2012  |  41 comments
Neil Armstrong, first man to step on the moon, dies at 82

Neil Armstrong, the astronaut who marked an epochal achievement in exploration with ‚Äúone small step‚ÄĚ from the Apollo 11 lunar module on July 20, 1969, becoming the first person to walk on the moon, died Aug. 25 in the Cincinnati area. He was 82.

His family announced the death in a statement and attributed it to ‚Äúcomplications resulting from cardiovascular procedures.‚ÄĚ


CLICK HERE to Read Entire Article
www.washingtonpost.com

Sinner's State After Death
  START  
  Recommended sermons | more..
•  Sinner's State After DeathRev. John Greer | 12/6/2009
•  Christians and Death, Pt 1 • Pastor John MacArthur | 11/25/2009
•  Why Jackson's Death MattersCraig Musselman | 7/6/2009
•  The Harvest Past • Ichabod Spencer | 2/17/2009

   03/14/15  |  Another One Bites the Dust • 2 comments
   03/11/15  |  God Doesn't Want Matt Chandler to be Your Pastor • 18 comments
   01/08/14  |  Christian Post: Warning, this article may offend many Christians • 93 comments
   01/01/14  |  Michelle Obama praises lesbian TV anchor • 17 comments
   12/29/13  |  U.S. Slams 'Conservative Gender Norms' • 377 comments
MORE RELATED ( ) NEWS | MORE..
   07/30/15  |  Chinese leaders order all crosses demolished • 14 comments
   07/30/15  |  Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards Compares Pro-Lifers... • 23 comments
   07/22/15  |  Video: Planned Parenthood Doctor Haggling Price of Baby Body... • 30 comments
   07/21/15  |  Graham: Stop Muslim Immigration • 15 comments
   07/18/15  |  White House backs Planned Parenthood's explanation • 15 comments
OTHER CHOICE NEWS | MORE..
   07/15/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Improved Online Donation Support for... • 13 comments
   07/03/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Enjoy Sermons + Find Churches On The Apple...
   05/20/15  |  Voddie Baucham‚Äôs big move to Africa • 7 comments
   04/24/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: e-Sword Bible Software Integrates with... • 11 comments
   04/19/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Upload Sermons From Anywhere Using An iPhone or... • 3 comments
MORE SPECIAL | MORE..
   08/02/15  |  Most Americans Do Not Believe US is a Christian Nation • 4 comments
   08/02/15  |  TPP trade deal hits the wall
   08/02/15  |  Fetal organs harvested for lab rats • 1 comments
   08/02/15  |  The Sexual-heresy Agenda: Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance That... • 1 comments
   08/02/15  |  Celebs oppose Amnesty call to ‚Äėdecriminalise prostitution‚Äô • 17 comments
OTHER RECENT NEWS | MORE..
COMMENTS | show all | add new  
    Sorting Order:  
Page 1 | Page 2 ·  Found: 41 user comment(s)
News Item9/5/12 2:26 PM
Neil | Tucson  Find all comments by Neil
r.gr wrote:
If you knew it wouldnt impress why use it. would it be usefull in any case.with a budget of 4 trillion you would think you have one test dont you?
you might get arockets to work -vacuum but does it produce thrust?
The reason has already been given below, by Lurker.

You ignored my experimental challenge. I dare you to PROVE what you claim, using a method such as I described. Otherwise, you're just another pseudoscientific snake-oil peddler.

21

News Item9/5/12 8:48 AM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
r.gr wrote:

If you knew it wouldnt impress why use it....case.with a budget of 4 trillion you would think you have one test dont you?
you might get arockets to work -vacuum but does it produce thrust?
Lurker why so many? one good reason is money and lots of it.the root of all evil is the love of money.not only that they are trying to find a way out of Gods presence. Dont i remember NASA loosing 2 trillion some where..hmm 2 trillion do you know how much money that is nasas budget is 4 trillion for what?
Ps 1 tell me there is a conspircy agaisnt God.
That religion that fights against Gods people is Freemasonary the worship of satan, every president has been one, the queen phillip charles every leader in the world today belongs to this secreat society every media owned by the same people Reuters, our murdoch is a known mason, why do you think we are bombarded in every nation about gay agenda its the same club. Mike the media is not hostile its may appear to you as being but its not Big companies own the world BIG banks.
I was like you guys when 911 a plane hit your towers ... But it was fake my proof a soft nose plane engines & all threw a b?. & buid 7. cont
NASA budget in very low billions.

Thousands of eyewitnesses, wrong?

20

News Item9/5/12 7:02 AM
r.gr | australia  Find all comments by r.gr
Neil wrote:
I knew that impress
who first...
If you knew it wouldnt impress why use it. would it be usefull in any case.with a budget of 4 trillion you would think you have one test dont you?
you might get arockets to work -vacuum but does it produce thrust?

Lurker why so many? one good reason is money and lots of it.the root of all evil is the love of money.not only that they are trying to find a way out of Gods presence. Dont i remember NASA loosing 2 trillion some where..hmm 2 trillion do you know how much money that is nasas budget is 4 trillion for what?
Ps 1 tell me there is a conspircy agaisnt God.
That religion that fights against Gods people is Freemasonary the worship of satan, every president has been one, the queen phillip charles every leader in the world today belongs to this secreat society every media is owned by the same people Reuters, our murdoch is a known mason, why do you think we are bombarded in every nation about gay agenda its the same club. Mike the media is not hostile its may appear to you as being but its not Big companies own the world BIG banks.
I was like you guys when 911 a plane hit your towers as the tv showed me. But it was fake my proof a soft nose plane engines & all threw a b?. & buid 7. cont

19

News Item9/4/12 11:16 AM
Neil | Tucson  Find all comments by Neil
r.gr wrote:
I didnt have time to put that in it(newton law is mis applied if u r reffering to a vacuum as well as here).its pushing against the atmosphare not nothing in every direction i might add shawly, think)
doesnt it?
I knew that posted video wouldn't impress you.

If you're so sure your theory is correct & the rest of the world is wrong, then it doesn't take a NASA-sized budget to prove it. All you have to do is find a liter-sized bottle capable of withstanding evacuation, a seal for it, a pump which can suck the air out, a thrust device such as those used in model rocketry (or failing that, a CO2 cartridge), threads to hang it on, & a way to ignite it through the bottle's seal.

This is something any reasonably dedicated amateur could do. Impress us all & post a video of it.

18

News Item9/4/12 7:46 AM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
r.gr wrote:
---
yes the gasses are expanding rapidly out of one end of the rocket, but they are expanding every into a vacuum, this vacuum is 'sucking' on the gasses as quick as they expand so the net result is zero force in one direction.
I think you might have to explain the point of it all, if it be just smoke and mirrors. Or for that matter, how it could possibly be hidden from a hostile media that loves to tear down.
17

News Item9/4/12 5:02 AM
Kyle | Connecticut  Find all comments by Kyle
R.gr,

I worked for an aerospace company, and we actually ran a test in vacuum. We put a rocket in a vacuum and fired it. It worked.

16

News Item9/4/12 12:00 AM
Lurker  Protected NameFind all comments by Lurker
r.gr wrote:
yes the gasses are expanding rapidly out of one end of the rocket, but they are expanding every into a vacuum, this vacuum is 'sucking' on the gasses as quick as they expand so the net result is zero force in one direction.
Great to hear from you too, old friend.

It seems to me that if you are being objective, you would require the same measure of proof to believe this theory as you are asking for to believe jet propulsion works in a vacuum. Do you have such proof?

But all that aside, if space exploration, manned or unmanned, is nothing more than a hoax (and it would be if there was no way to navigate a spaceship beyond Earth's atmosphere; i.e. no jet propulsion in a vacuum), I would have to ask what motivates so many nations to participate in the hoax. Or has NASA fooled them as well?

"The International Space Station is one of the most ambitious international collaborations ever attempted. The largest space station ever constructed, the ISS continues to be assembled in orbit.

United States - NASA
Canada - CSA
Japan - JAXA
Russia - Roscosmos
Belgium
Denmark - DNSC
France - CNES
Germany - DLR
Italy - ASI
Netherlands
Norway - NSC
Spain - INTA
Sweden - SNSB
Switzerland
United Kingdom "

15

News Item9/3/12 10:28 PM
r.gr | australia  Find all comments by r.gr
Lurker wrote:
OK,
Hi buddy great to hear from you again. I didnt have time to put that in it(newton law is mis applied if u r reffering to a vacuum as well as here).its pushing against the atmosphare not nothing in every direction i might add shawly, think)
doesnt it? also thats my point and not just mine or so called looneys lol. Newton is wrong on that point if u mean thats in space as well. Prove to me not via like a picture that neil provided of wallace & gommit going to the moon. but a real test..I use to beleive as you do until little over 5 years ago isntead of laughing and making fun of them as i did at people who challanged me with the very same arguments which is just what i had been taught and said look at the tv its real, but when it came to actualy, test there is none.well none as of now still do u have one , one. doest that send alarm bell to your mind.What there not one tangable test that shows a rocket working in a vacuum?That even NASA say they have all their satalites and shuttle in low orbit atmosphare?

yes the gasses are expanding rapidly out of one end of the rocket, but they are expanding every into a vacuum, this vacuum is 'sucking' on the gasses as quick as they expand so the net result is zero force in one direction.

14

News Item9/3/12 12:48 PM
Lurker  Protected NameFind all comments by Lurker
R.gr wrote:
neil, neil , neil thats not a test so thats your truth? ever asked your self where is the videos testd for a rocket working in a vacuum?
and mike you need more proof than the word physics, your not going to tell me that in a vacuum it pushes against itself?? duh
or curiosity can slow down from 12000 mph with a parachute yer right when the atmosphare of mars is .01 of earths. No i believe what i am told by nasa they wouldnt lie, tv showed me.. whats logical. any video tests of this shute working... ah no..anamation only or for security reasons lol. its like trying to stop a shooting star with a shute!!Imposible.
here rover catch...
but you guys are brainer than me thats fine. show me the evedence real evedence tests real science tests not some movie neil. neil or mike show and i will be happy repent
OK, Remo, get ready to repent.

Newton's Third Law.... "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction."

The "action" is the force of the exaust gases and the "reaction" is the same force applied against the mass of the rocket and its payload. The vacuum of space doesn't enter into the equation.

see here

13

News Item9/3/12 2:39 AM
R.gr | Australia  Find all comments by R.gr
Neil wrote:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMBcLg0DkLA&feature=related
(about 50s into the clip)
But why would a skeptic about the moon landings, or the space program in general, accept any video as evidence?
neil, neil , neil thats not a test so thats your truth? ever asked your self where is the videos testd for a rocket working in a vacuum?
and mike you need more proof than the word physics, your not going to tell me that in a vacuum it pushes against itself?? duh
or curiosity can slow down from 12000 mph with a parachute yer right when the atmosphare of mars is .01 of earths. No i believe what i am told by nasa they wouldnt lie, tv showed me.. whats logical. any video tests of this shute working... ah no..anamation only or for security reasons lol. its like trying to stop a shooting star with a shute!!Imposible.
here rover catch...
but you guys are brainer than me thats fine. show me the evedence real evedence tests real science tests not some movie neil. neil or mike show and i will be happy repent
12

News Item9/2/12 8:21 PM
Kyle | Connecticut  Find all comments by Kyle
Why would a rocket not work in vacuum? You really can't make these statements if you want credibility.
11

News Item9/2/12 11:18 AM
Neil | Tucson  Find all comments by Neil
R.gr wrote:
Show me one video where a rocket works in a vaccum and Ill believe you!!!Or no tv told me so...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMBcLg0DkLA&feature=related
(about 50s into the clip)

But why would a skeptic about the moon landings, or the space program in general, accept any video as evidence?

10

News Item9/2/12 8:55 AM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
R.gr wrote:
NO!
Your name is not fall is it? fall for anything. Show me one video where a rocket works in a vaccum and Ill believe you!!!Or no tv told me so...
No physics for you, eh?
9

News Item9/2/12 4:00 AM
R.gr | Australia  Find all comments by R.gr
Mike wrote:
C'mon now, admit it. You're Tony, right?
NO!

Your name is not fall is it? fall for anything. Show me one video where a rocket works in a vaccum and Ill believe you!!!Or no tv told me so...

8

News Item8/30/12 7:35 PM
John Yurich USA | USA  Find all comments by John Yurich USA
Mike wrote:
That's silly. Everyone knows you can't build cities on foundations of cheese.
Right, because the moon is made out of cheese. Haha.
7

News Item8/30/12 12:33 PM
Astro Not  Find all comments by Astro Not
Alexander The Least wrote:
Internal Intelligence Records Have Already Confirmed Man Was On (That Is, Man Colonized) The Earth's Only Moon Long Before July 20, 1969.
Even The "Scrubbed" Lunar Photos Taken By NASA Before The 1960s Confirm That Man, Probably The Russians If Not The Americans, Had Already Built Cities On The "Dark"-Side Of Earth's Moon Decades BEFORE The Neil Armstrong 1969-Moon-Landing "Cover-Up" !
Oh I get it Alex;
Your getting your facts from the original moon landing [technical] information which came from;
"A Trip to the Moon or Voyage to the Moon (French: Le Voyage dans la lune) is a 1902 French black-and-white silent science fiction film. It is based loosely on two popular novels of the time: Jules Verne's From the Earth to the Moon and H. G. Wells' The First Men in the Moon."

A Trip to the Moon

6

News Item8/29/12 10:09 PM
Alexander The Least  Find all comments by Alexander The Least
Since Australia & New Zealand Have A Freer Press Than The U.S.A.,

I Would Say R.gr Has A Very Logical & Reasonable Point.
Internal Intelligence Records Have Already Confirmed Man Was On (That Is, Man Colonized) The Earth's Only Moon Long Before July 20, 1969.

Even The "Scrubbed" Lunar Photos Taken By NASA Before The 1960s Confirm That Man, Probably The Russians If Not The Americans, Had Already Built Cities On The "Dark"-Side Of Earth's Moon Decades BEFORE The Neil Armstrong 1969-Moon-Landing "Cover-Up" !

But Then, Don't Tell Your Friends The Whole 1969-Moon-Landing Was A "Cover-Up": It Might Destroy Their Faith In The U.S. GOVERNMENT Never Being Wrong, Liars &-Or Wholesale Deceivers !

Especially With The Pseudo-President NOW Sitting In The Oval Office At The White House !

And The Pseudo-Conservative Republican Now Waiting In The Wings To Occupy Washington's Chief Mansion & House Of HOGWASH !

Neil Armstrong Probably Didn't Make Much Money After Being The Poster-Boy For THE 1969-LUNAR-FALLACY--But He Did KEEP His MOUTH SHUT Regarding It's Grand COVER-UP Of Who REALLY Landed & Colonized Earth's Moon's "DARK"-SIDE:

AS OTHERS STILL HAVE LOCK-JAW ON GLOBALISMS' EVIL
DARK SIDE !

NOTE:"mike/new york's" Faith Is Built On Nothing Less Than Cheese &
N-W-O DUNG !

5

News Item8/29/12 8:31 PM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
Alexander The Least wrote:
Since Australia & New Zealand Have A Freer Press Than The U.S.A.,
I Would Say R.gr Has A Very Logical & Reasonable Point.
Internal Intelligence Records Have Already Confirmed Man Was On (That Is, Man Colonized) The Earth's Only Moon Long Before July 20, 1969.
Even The "Scrubbed" Lunar Photos Taken By NASA Before The 1960s Confirm That Man, Probably The Russians If Not The Americans, Had Already Built Cities On The "Dark"-Side Of Earth's Moon Decades BEFORE The Neil Armstrong 1969-Moon-Landing "Cover-Up" !
---
That's silly. Everyone knows you can't build cities on foundations of cheese.
4

News Item8/29/12 4:06 PM
Alexander The Least  Find all comments by Alexander The Least
R.gr wrote:
which moon did he land? in hollywood maybe.
Since Australia & New Zealand Have A Freer Press Than The U.S.A.,
I Would Say R.gr Has A Very Logical & Reasonable Point.

Internal Intelligence Records Have Already Confirmed Man Was On (That Is, Man Colonized) The Earth's Only Moon Long Before July 20, 1969.

Even The "Scrubbed" Lunar Photos Taken By NASA Before The 1960s Confirm That Man, Probably The Russians If Not The Americans, Had Already Built Cities On The "Dark"-Side Of Earth's Moon Decades BEFORE The Neil Armstrong 1969-Moon-Landing "Cover-Up" !

But Then, Don't Tell Your Friends The Whole 1969-Moon-Landing Was A "Cover-Up": It Might Destroy Their Faith In The U.S. GOVERNMENT Never Being Wrong, Liars &-Or Wholesale Deceivers !

Especially With The Pseudo-President NOW Sitting In The Oval Office At The White House !

And The Pseudo-Conservative Republican Now Waiting In The Wings To Occupy Washington's Chief Mansion & House Of HOGWASH !

Neil Armstrong Probably Didn't Make Much Money After Being The Poster-Boy For THE 1969-LUNAR-FALLACY--But He Did KEEP His MOUTH SHUT Regarding It's Grand COVER-UP Of Who REALLY Landed & Colonized Earth's Moon's "DARK"-SIDE:

*AS OTHERS STILL HAVE LOCK-JAW ON GLOBALISMS' EVIL
DARK SIDE !

3

News Item8/28/12 8:56 AM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
R.gr wrote:
which moon did he land? in hollywood maybe.
C'mon now, admit it. You're Tony, right?
2
There are a total of 41 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments
Page 1 | Jump to Page : 1 [2] 3 | last
Last PostTotal
Most under-35s have not heard of the King James Bible
jim lincoln from nebraska: "albert you mean you have read,..."
-1 min 195 
Celebs oppose Amnesty call to ‚Äėdecriminalise prostitution‚Äô
dis from gusted: "in germany, one sa radio show documented pressure for those..."
-10 min 17 
Why Obama Admin Won't Use 'Islamic'
get real from wisconsin: "take him to detroit ... lol ..."
-13 min 



Dr. Calvin Ray Evans
Overcomers

Revelation 12:10-11
Sunday - AM
Evangelistic Outreach
Play! | MP3 | RSS

The Lord MY Shepherd
Richard Warmack

Ken Wimer
The Only Refuge

Book of Psalms
Shreveport Grace Church
Play! | MP3

Kevin Swanson
McConnell Won't Defund PP

Christians Losing Appeals
Generations Radio
Play! | MP3

Rev. Ivan Foster
Prospect of Gospel in Ulster

Burning Bush Audio Archive
Sunday - PM
Play! | MP3

Sponsor: Paul Washer: "Most Useful Bible Study"
www.puritandownloads.com/pa..

SPONSOR | 1,800+

SPONSOR




                   
Christ's blood is heavens key. ... Thomas Brooks

City: Las Vegas, NV
Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal
MOBILE
iPhone + iPad New!
Church App
Android New!
Church App
Kindle + Nook
Chromecast TV
ROKU TV
BlackBerry
Windows Mobile
Apple Watch New!
Pebble Smartwatch
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES | ALL
Local Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Podcasting
Video Support
Live Webcasting New!
Transcription Service
Business Cards
SOLO | MINI Sites
Domain Redirect
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations New!
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Auto-Upload Sermons
Auto-Blog Import
Picasa | FTP | Dropbox
ABOUT US
SermonAudio.com is the largest library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide. All broadcasters must adhere to the Articles of Faith.

Our Services | Testimonials
Broadcast With Us!
Support Us
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Copyright © 2015 SermonAudio.com.