Obama 'destroying morality' with transgender agenda
It‚Äôs just the latest advance in the transgender agenda adopted by the Obama administration, which on Friday prompted a powerful legal team that advocates for traditional marriage values to conclude, ‚ÄúMove over sonograms: you can no longer determine if it is a boy or a girl, according to the secularists in the White House who believe that sex is only determined by subjective belief, not biology.‚ÄĚ
That word comes from officials with Liberty Counsel, whose chairman, Mathew Staver, said, ‚ÄúThe Obama administration is secularizing America and destroying morality and common sense. Immorality is being exalted while religious liberty is being extinguished.‚ÄĚ
The Obama administration already has championed abortion, same-sex ‚Äúmarriage‚ÄĚ and homosexual promotions, all of which find obstacles in the Judeo-Christian standards on which the nation was founded....
John MacArthur wrote: There are people who think that if America becomes moral, God will bless America. There are people who think if America becomes moral and religious, then God will doubly bless America. So, let's put God back in the public discourse, let's put prayer back in the schools, let's put the Ten Commandments up on the wall in public places, in courtrooms. Let's stop abortion. Let's stop rampant homosexuality. Let's stop pornography, etc. And if we can just bring about some kind of morality, and better yet, some kind of commitment to God, then we will be blessed. Well let me make a very clear point at the outset here. Morality and religion will not invite or secure the blessing of God. They never have and they never will. A more moral America, a more moral and religious America does not advance in divine favor one inch. A more moral and a more religious America will not escape divine judgment any more than Pharisaic Judaism in Jesus' time escaped the devastating judgment of God in 70 A.D. when hundreds of thousands of Jews were slaughtered by godless Romans. And Jesus warned about that on several occasions.
I agree. It's almost impossible to vote for a true conservative and expect them to win in today's America. I think it's worse nowadays because the ranks are not only made up the young and ignorant masses, but older voters who should know better but don't.
We can blame the democrats but actually there is little difference between the two parties. For example, John McCain speaks more like a liberal socialist democrat than Obama. In fact, with all the executive orders that Obama had signed, who has called him on anything. The Republicans are silent. No one wants to be called a racist; this is the death nail to a politician's chance for reelection. Obama knows it, and he is playing that card as far as it can take him. So what we have is a single party system with a Democratic Party and a Rhino Democratic Party. Together there is an aristocratic government with socialist power over the masses,
Jim Lincoln wrote: If a few people can destroy morality then it must not have much of a hold anyway in a country, but one again has to realize The Inadequacy of Moralism. Apparently, not enough churches don't have people pounding the doors spreading the Gospel.
Translation: It doesn't matter what Obama does, I'm here to defend his right to do it. He's Caesar, you see.
So because morality is inadequate to get one to heaven, we shouldn't have moral laws? It is better to have immoral laws like this administration is pushing because at least it points out how inadequate morality is? Sur that makes perfect sense. Just about as much sense to say that the reason President Obama is pushing transgender agenda is because not enough people are knocking on doors. God forbid that we would think that Obama is responsible for the decisions he makes.
If a few people can destroy morality then it must not have much of a hold anyway in a country, but one again has to realize The Inadequacy of Moralism. Apparently, not enough churches don't have people pounding the doors spreading the Gospel.
This is speech control. I can't refer to a girl being a girl or a boy being a boy because that's subjective judgment? It depends upon whether or not how the parents (?) or child want to call themselves? Now, how are we going to define irrationalism or insanity? Talk about a league of demons coming out of Washington!!