Federal judge rules key provisions of controversial Texas abortion law unconstitutional
In a stunning move, a federal judge Monday ruled that abortion restrictions authorized by Texas lawmakers in July are unconstitutional, and will not be implemented as scheduled on Tuesday, according to court documents obtained by NBC News.
U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel decided Monday that the regulations requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital impeded on the rights of physicians to do what they judge is best for their patients and would unreasonably limit a woman's access to state abortion clinics.
"The admitting-privileges provision of House Bill 2 does not bear a rational relationship to the legitimate right of the state in preserving and promoting fetal life or a woman's health and, in any event, places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her," Yeakel wrote in his decision....
Huh! since I put my last comment up with a tablet, I thought I messed up the URL, not an uncommon occurrence for me with tablets and URLs, but I can see any problem with it -- except it doesn't work so,
Jim Lincoln wrote: Apparently, Frank, the judge thought that this law was too restrictive. I wonder what will happen to the law as it progresses through the court system. It will be interesting to keep track of it.
My guess is the federal judge's opinion will be upheld, but then who knows? My question would be how can the murder of an innocent baby be "too restrictive"?