Jeremy Irons: Gay Marriage Could Lead to Fathers Marrying Sons
British actor Jeremy Irons has sparked outrage by suggesting gay marriage in Britain could lead to fathers marrying their sons in a bid to avoid inheritance tax.
The Lolita star made the strange comments in an interview with the Huffington Post in which he claimed a law allowing same-sex couples to officially marry could create a loophole to bypass the U.K.'s heavy death duties.
I am at a loss for these things we see happening in this world. We can only expect it to worsen as days pass. Christians hide in fear and refuse to speak out as one. We are allowing it to happen to the point of no return. But, these things God to.d us would happen.we figure we will be raptures up and everything is good to go. 1corinthins tells isatthe sound of the 7th trump we will be taken. So we will suffer through the tribulation and fully deserve it. The time quickly approaches, we need to learn to speak out, to teach, be prepared, and show those who will listen the truth. If we don't who will? If we know the truth and refuse to share it what do you think God will have to say? Put on your armor folks, get ready, and speak out. Now is the time. Find every venue you can to tell of the gospel and the salvation that is there within. Speak without fear to your neighbors, friends, the guy at the coffee shop. Don't be surprised at these things you see happening or said it was foretold and we have a job to do. God Bless.
sex au naturel wrote: "What would be an evangelical theological response be to the notion that sex using artificial contraception is no different than sex between homosexuals? If gay sex is unnatural how is contraceptive sex natural?" -Anthony Bradley, Ph.D., Westminster Theological Seminary, Covenant Theological Seminary, Director of the Francis A. Schaeffer Institute, The King's College If father-son sex is unnatural how is artificial contraception natural?
Who said it was?
If you want to make a case that contraception is displeasing to God, I'll give you a text which may help.... Gen 38:8-10.
However, in no way does that justify the abomination of sodomy.
To unnatural natural. It is not my intent to sound crude or rude but your name indicates as does your question that you are somewhat sadly confused so here is the gentlest yet most direct way i know to clear this up for you. By the way my 8 yr old understood perfectly when i explained to him : THE PARTS DONT FIT!!! Therefore, vag intercourse between a man and woman are a perfectly natural act. Two men or two ladies? Once again, THE PARTS DONT FIT !! In otherwords UN natural. I truly hope this helps you straighten things out. I bid u good nite!
Artificial contraception, which I do not defend, is the blocking of a natural (or at least potential) result of a natural act. Sodomite acts have no natural or potential production of life because it is an unnatural act.
"What would be an evangelical theological response be to the notion that sex using artificial contraception is no different than sex between homosexuals? If gay sex is unnatural how is contraceptive sex natural?" -Anthony Bradley, Ph.D., Westminster Theological Seminary, Covenant Theological Seminary, Director of the Francis A. Schaeffer Institute, The King's College
If father-son sex is unnatural how is artificial contraception natural?
Walter: You are absolutely right -- it is not at all far-fetched. By the way, I woke up this morning and realized I am a black man (or was it a Spanish explorer) with caucasian skin. Now don't judge me for this -- my feelings validate who I am on the inside. The sodomite community does not want to join the God-ordained institution of marriage...rather they want to destroy it through the absurdity of redefinition without boundary. They have crossed the first and biggest boundary. The other boundaries should be easy.
With gay unions bei b g accepted worldwide now, absolutely nothing will surprise me from this point forward. Marry your pet, marry your daughter, my sister is also my wife, my mom is my sister, whatever.
It is amazing to read about "outrage" from those who have accepted and promote the outrageous. It is the same mistake humans have made over and over. The idea that if we just move the line of morality down just a few notches, it will not be moved again. What Mr. Irons suggests is not out of the question for a world living in postmodern relativism. Pray God he isn't proven right.