members, click to sign in..

4,833 active users!!Bandwidth
TUESDAY
MAY 26, 2015
Home
NewsSITE
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
BroadcastersNew Stuff!
Local Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -31 min
Top Sermons
VideosPDFs
Daily Log
Photos
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
About | 6 Days Left!
Submit Sermon
Members Only

Breaking News Home | All | Religion | Society | Tech | Choice | SA News
FRONT PAGE  |  5/26/2015
MONDAY, MAR 11, 2013  |  9 comments
Wall Street Journal Attacks Rand Paul Filibuster

The Rand Paul filibuster against drone strikes in the nomination of John Brennan as CIA director brought plaudits from across the political spectrum, but also harsh (and inaccurate) criticism from the Wall Street Journal and other neoconservative pundits.

“He's apparently serious, though his argument isn't,” a house Wall Street Journal editorial concluded of Ron Paul's demands. At the core of the Journal's complaint against Senator Paul's opposition to handing the president the power to assassinate American citizens in the United States was the Journal's belief that the president can kill Americans — inside or outside the borders of the United States — without due process. Moreover, we have the administration's word that this awesome power would only be wielded against "enemy combatants."

The White House appeared to approve of strikes against American citizens, with White House Press Spokesman ...


CLICK HERE to Read Entire Article
www.thenewamerican.com

Seals 5 & 6: Persecuted Church
  START  
  Recommended sermons | more..
•  Seals 5 & 6: Persecuted ChurchDr. Joel Beeke | 11/11/2012
•  Being Good Citizen of America • Jeff Arthur | 12/7/2008
•  Response to Obama's Presidency • Marc Monte | 11/9/2008
•  The Christian and Government • Pastor John MacArthur | 6/27/2009

   03/14/15  |  Another One Bites the Dust • 2 comments
   03/11/15  |  God Doesn't Want Matt Chandler to be Your Pastor • 18 comments
   01/08/14  |  Christian Post: Warning, this article may offend many Christians • 93 comments
   01/01/14  |  Michelle Obama praises lesbian TV anchor • 17 comments
   12/29/13  |  U.S. Slams 'Conservative Gender Norms' • 377 comments
MORE RELATED ( ) NEWS | MORE..
   05/26/15  |  ISIS Slaughters and Mutilates 400 • 5 comments
   05/23/15  |  Gallup: Americans 'greatly overestimate' LGBT numbers • 10 comments
   05/23/15  |  Louisiana Lawmakers Reject Religious Freedom Bill, Governor... • 2 comments
   05/22/15  |  John Glenn Says Evolution Should Be Taught in Schools; Affirms... • 17 comments
   05/20/15  |  Ashers manager: 'We don't think we've done anything wrong' • 7 comments
OTHER CHOICE NEWS | MORE..
   05/26/15  |  Pope Francis Wants to Be Remembered as a ‘Good Guy’ • 5 comments
   05/26/15  |  Police Have Little To Say About Pastor's Shooting • 4 comments
   05/26/15  |  Iran commander warns of Isis threat to its security
   05/26/15  |  ISIS Slaughters and Mutilates 400 • 5 comments
   05/26/15  |  Illinois Couple Welcomes Their 100th Grandchild • 3 comments
OTHER RECENT NEWS | MORE..
COMMENTS | show all | add new  
    Sorting Order:  
· Page 1 ·  Found: 9 user comment(s)
News Item3/12/13 4:24 PM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
Jim Lincoln wrote:
---
Presidents should follow federal law when they do something. I think Mr. Paul wants openness in actions -- surprisingly the same thing Liberals want.
What if presidents make federal law, Jim? Ah, if it were only true that liberals wanted openness. You really must differentiate between their speeches and their actions.
9

News Item3/12/13 3:07 PM
Rufus | Fort Worth, TX  Protected NameFind all comments by Rufus
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Only in periods of rebellion, is martial law permissible, I think you'll see that the courts have limited the use martial law since the Civil War, and defined the responsibilities of civil and military government. This is an interesting source of information, Martial Law..
Also you might want to look at, President Sends Troops to Little Rock, Federalizes Arkansas National Guard; Tells Nation He Acted to Avoid An Anarchy on what Eisenhower did, and then University of Alabama desegregated when Kennedy federalized the Alabama National Guard.
Could they use drones to keep track of movements of people? Why not? They no doubt would not have any qualms about using helicopters to do the same.
Presidents should follow federal law when they do something. I think Mr. Paul wants openness in actions -- surprisingly the same thing Liberals want.
So that would be a yes?
8

News Item3/12/13 3:01 PM
Jim Lincoln | Nebraska  Find all comments by Jim Lincoln
Only in periods of rebellion, is martial law permissible, I think you'll see that the courts have limited the use martial law since the Civil War, and defined the responsibilities of civil and military government. This is an interesting source of information, Martial Law..

Also you might want to look at, President Sends Troops to Little Rock, Federalizes Arkansas National Guard; Tells Nation He Acted to Avoid An Anarchy on what Eisenhower did, and then University of Alabama desegregated when Kennedy federalized the Alabama National Guard.

Could they use drones to keep track of movements of people? Why not? They no doubt would not have any qualms about using helicopters to do the same.

Presidents should follow federal law when they do something. I think Mr. Paul wants openness in actions -- surprisingly the same thing Liberals want.

7

News Item3/12/13 12:13 AM
Rufus | Fort Worth, TX  Protected NameFind all comments by Rufus
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Rufus, well, when Randy is called a "wacko," by a fellow senator, q.v., John McCain Calls Rand Paul, Justin Amash, and Ted Cruz "Wacko Birds" one should take notice.
But you mean I didn't redeem myself with the piece from the liberal "Atlantic," which as far as I can see was rather complimentary of Mr. Paul, in the "Cliff Notes," article? Aren't you happy liberals are heaping praise on Mr. Paul? ...
I don't really care what liberals do, say or think regarding Senator Paul (and you can certainly place McCain in the liberal category). I'm not seeking to support the person but on occasion I do appreciate Senator Paul's ideas.

I do wonder about this though regarding your ideas...

Do you believe the Federal Government should be able to classify a citizen of the United States as an "enemy combatant" and then execute him on United States soil without a trial?

6

News Item3/11/13 2:55 PM
Jim Lincoln | Nebraska  Find all comments by Jim Lincoln
Rufus, well, when Randy is called a "wacko," by a fellow senator, q.v., John McCain Calls Rand Paul, Justin Amash, and Ted Cruz "Wacko Birds" one should take notice.

But you mean I didn't redeem myself with the piece from the liberal "Atlantic," which as far as I can see was rather complimentary of Mr. Paul, in the "Cliff Notes," article? Aren't you happy liberals are heaping praise on Mr. Paul? Rather good article in removed all of the hot air all politicians are prone to, and just gave the essence of Mr. Paul's comments.

5

News Item3/11/13 2:07 PM
Rufus | Fort Worth, TX  Protected NameFind all comments by Rufus
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Ah, "Like father like son," Randy is just as goofy as his father, Ronny. Too bad, the WSJ didn't make their article open to the public, I would suspect they found Randy's comments just as thoughtful and deep as his comments in the Rand Paul’s T***** Tirade.
By the way, fellow this intellectual feather-weight did endorse Mitt Romney.
Randy sometimes has the appearance of substance, except when you give even a tiny thought, and realize he doesn't really have anything. Hey, but he's good for a laugh.
Mr. Lincoln,

The federal government should have nothing to do with the toilets, light bulbs etc. of its citizens. Your name calling demonstrates a lack of substance in your argumentation and qualifies as railing in my mind.

Do you believe the Federal Government should be able to classify a citizen of the United States as an "enemy combatant" and then execute him on United States soil without a trial?

As best I can tell, this was what Senator Paul was attempting to highlight as it would appear this administration and its appointees are comfortable with assassinating Americans.

4

News Item3/11/13 1:53 PM
Jim Lincoln | Nebraska  Find all comments by Jim Lincoln
Ah, "Like father like son," Randy is just as goofy as his father, Ronny. Too bad, the WSJ didn't make their article open to the public, I would suspect they found Randy's comments just as thoughtful and deep as his comments in the Rand Paul’s T***** Tirade.

By the way, fellows this intellectual feather-weight did endorse Mitt Romney.

Randy sometimes has the appearance of substance, except when you give even a tiny thought, and realize he doesn't really have anything. Hey, but he's good for a laugh. I have no doubt that the WSJ gave a very good comment on Randy's filibuster, much more so, than the comments from the source that SA used. But, if you didn't like the remarks in a conservative source such as WSJ, you might like one from a liberal source ( gasp! ) Cliffs Notes for the Filibuster: Rand Paul in His Own Words. Rand Paul is a liberal?!

3

News Item3/11/13 12:10 PM
jpw  Find all comments by jpw
ah, Mike, you are getting it. well done. but we must see that the legislation was pushed by republicans and supported by the nat'l convention and the pres'l candidates (both the one who won and lost). and that evangelical leaders stood behind this party and the candidate in this regard... and therefore, although it is easy to blame them liberals, its right in our court.... and continues to be.

I am waiting for our "great, biblical" pastors and denominational leaders to apologize for their support of Iq wore (persecution of Christians) and the subsequent giving away of the bll or rghts before our eyes.

Really important at this point, for us to note who has written these things...

2

News Item3/11/13 8:42 AM
Mike | New York  Find all comments by Mike
From the news: "At the core of the Journal's complaint against Senator Paul's opposition to handing the president the power to assassinate American citizens in the United States was the Journal's belief that the president can kill Americans — inside or outside the borders of the United States — without due process. Moreover, we have the administration's word that this awesome power would only be wielded against "enemy combatants."

"Enemy combatants" as defined by the administration, of course. So their word means little. Unconstitutional, but hey, so is much of what it does.

Here's another way of looking at it. If employees of the gov kill Americans without trial, merely because they have been they have been defined as enemy combatants, they are acting as criminals themselves. Well dressed ones, but criminals.

1
There are a total of 9 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments
Last PostTotal
Irish voters back gay marriage in 'social revolution'
penny: "unprofitable servant, i think i'll back you up here on your point, because..."
-27 min 24 
Illinois Couple Welcomes Their 100th Grandchild
lady_virtue from okc: "wow! talk about a quiver full! :)"
-27 min 
700 Kenyan Evangelical Pastors Urge Obama Not to 'Preach' Gay...
never from out: "pray all you want but only war will stop the damned and their..."
-59 min 


Jim Byrd
The Unbelieved Report

Isaiah 53:1-2
Sunday Service
13th Street Baptist Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS




Jon Couch
Look To God: Part 2

This Day Ministries
Radio Broadcast
Play! | MP3

Jim Wood
Jesus is Coming

A Study of Thessalonians
Abiding in Christ
Video!Play! | MP4

Bob Vincent
We Need Brainwashing

How Humans Think
Grace Presbyterian Church
Play! | MP3

Sponsor:
Paul Washer: "Most Useful Bible Study

See what Paul Washer calls the most useful Bible study tool in hist­ory. Click here!
www.puritandownloads.com/pa..

Sermon: A Biblical Fear of the Lord
Pastor James Mansfield

SPONSOR | 1,400+

SPONSOR




                   
Witnessing is the whole work of the whole church for the whole age. ... A. T. Pierson

City: Las Vegas, NV
Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal
MOBILE
iPhone + iPad New!
Church App
Android New!
Church App
Kindle + Nook New!
Chromecast TV
ROKU TV
BlackBerry
Windows Mobile
Apple Watch New!
Pebble Smartwatch
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices New!
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES | ALL
Local Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Podcasting
Video Support
Live Webcasting
Transcription Service
Business Cards
SOLO | MINI Sites
Domain Redirect
Favorites
QR Codes
24x7 Radio Stream

INTEGRATION
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword New!
JSON API New!

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Auto-Upload Sermons
Auto-Blog Import
Picasa | FTP | Dropbox
ABOUT US
SermonAudio.com is the largest library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide. All broadcasters must adhere to the Articles of Faith.

Our Services | Testimonials
Broadcast With Us!
Support Us
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Copyright © 2015 SermonAudio.com.