Jim Lincoln wrote: Well, the "Old" Jim Lincoln would say that Donnie is a law breaker, See Romans 13:1-7 as a Christian views law. Oh and how the Christian might view, and listen to, The Inadequacy of Moralism.
Inadequate for what purpose? Inadequacy, like adequacy, requires definition of purpose. Does moralism have any worthwhile purpose? What kind of moralism is inadequate? Political, legal, religious? Are there any actions which may be understood as moral or immoral? What is your personal view, without having to listen to a sermon?
Well, the "Old" Jim Lincoln would say that Donnie is a law breaker, See Romans 13:1-7 as a Christian views law. Oh and how the Christian might view,
Webster's 1913 Dictionary wrote: MORALIST: 2. One who practices moral duties; a person who lives in conformity with moral rules; one of correct deportment and dealings with his fellow-creatures; -- sometimes used in contradistinction to one whose life is controlled by religious motives. The love (in the moralist of virtue, but in the Christian) of God himself. Hammond
the new lincoln will probably relish this kind of nonsense. what we need is to hold everyone accountable under the law -- we need people with moral character with a sound mind, not people getting hog mad and losing it.
Can he really be considered an Antichrist? I'm under the impression that Antichrist is/will be a spiritual leader of some sort. Or, can anyone who is not a born again Christian be considered Antichrist?
Sometimes revolution is necessary. OBAMA IS AN ANTI-CHRIST...Christians these days have turned cowardly. Islam is and always will be the enemy of our Faith! Jesus Christ is the only One True God. Trump is calling for a revolution because of fiscal I believe. We should be calling for a revolution on a moral basis. How far will this ungodly society endure? I pray in the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit that men will be called to a moral revolution. May Almighty God bless and keep you all well. Pray for me as I will for you...
Calls for revolution or riot are stupid and detrimental to the nation. Besides although Bozo won by a slim margin, he did win. If 'our' side can't even be counted on to vote a guy out of office, how could you ever count on them to have a full fledged revolution? Nope, I think the better way is to let Nero keep pouring gasoline on the fire just like his subjects want him too, and then in four years say 'I told you so' and vote in a proper president and hope that he does a better job.
All this said, I don't want Obama to fail. I want him to have a change of heart, turn to the Christian values that he claims to have, and lead this nation to a healing recovery. However, I don't have high hopes of this happening.
Jim Lincoln wrote: Yes. but anyone who knows about his divorces would know that. But, I assume you were asking a rhetorical question. I thought it was the Obama people who were going to riot, if their man didn't get elected?
There you go, for once you have correct thinking on a political issue. The pro-Obama would have rioted had their man not won. You see any riots from the republican side? Didn't think so.
50 million have already paid the ultimate 'tax' with their lives and this without representation. If the American Revolution was necessary, perhaps Trump's 'revolution' recommendation would not be too far-fetched.
Trump is a booby, plain and simple. I don't think we shall ever again have the ability to revolt. No I think what is about to happen is that we reap what we have sown. Has there ever been a nation that has been more blessed than ours? Yet we have followed in the footsteps of Israel and turned our backs on God and done what is evil in His sight. The only thing left for this nation is judgement.