CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say
Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later on the annex itself was denied by the CIA chain of command -- who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.
Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were...
Unlike the Democrats who booed God at their convention, the Republicans had not excluded Him from their party platform. However, the rule change did exclude Ron Paul delegates who had been legitimately chosen in order to replace them with Romney delegates. This happened at many of the state caucuses. Maybe that is why God did not give Romney the victory. If you can't play fair, you don't deserve to win. Of course, Obama's supporters engaged in massive voter fraud in order to win, so in the end, America lost!
huff, no, the rule change did not have anything to do with God, like the democrat's did. I apologize. I see now that my comment wasnt applicable. the rule change had to do with chaanging the number of states to nominate a candidate and the removal of states being able to choose their own delegates to the national convention. it can now be decided by the national commitee as to whether the delegate is worthy or loyal enough to the anointed candidate. It is now legal on tje party to do what they did to maine, oregon, mass, and many ohers.
many have been bringing attention to the fact that west was providing air cover for al queda to invade and then qad was brutally tortured in the streets.
no dignity.
the flag was flown over buildings directly after. then stories of villages emptied out of Christians fleeing and crops destroyed from turmoil.....
.....of course this is where it leads.
the world was talking about it!
but the american church -- silent!
the american church watched an ind nation be invaded with AQ and we sat back, watched, and made prophetic utterances.
this was inevitable.
where was the network to cover this before the elections?
good on them for saying something now, but as far as atrocities go.... its more than this.
Unprofitable Servant wrote: Republicans force their own corrupt out of office or races (that is how we got Senator Barak Obama) democrats keep theirs in. (like Edward Kennedy, Barney Frank, Bill Clinton, William Jefferson,etc. etc.)Beside the which, no republican denied the request for help during the Benghazi raid, so your point is pointless.
You realize you are arguing facts with Nebraska's foremost historical revisionist and Obama apologist?
Jim Lincoln wrote: Hillary Clinton: I will retire from politics in 2012 Strange that Republicans can't go after their own malfeasance politicians when they are in office, e.g., Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld. But, apparently it's only the party in power that has bums?
Republicans force their own corrupt out of office or races (that is how we got Senator Barak Obama) democrats keep theirs in. (like Edward Kennedy, Barney Frank, Bill Clinton, William Jefferson,etc. etc.)Beside the which, no republican denied the request for help during the Benghazi raid, so your point is pointless.
Didn't Barak Hussein Obama meet with represenative of the Muslim Brotherhood during the "Arab Spring" when Gaddafi was being overthrown?
To me Obama's actions, cover ups, blaming a YouTube video clip, failure to provide protection of U.S. Diplomats seems his regime is covering up for the Muslim brotherhood and/or radical Islam, aiding and betting them in their conquests and take overs.
regarding the dems convention... if you are refering to the totally fradulant vote were they clearly called it wrong from the chair...the republicans did the exact same thing regarding a very important/wrongful rule change. the teleprompter even called the vote befor tge votes were cast.
This is nothing comparable to anything the Bush administation did. This is manslaughter if not murder. Why do godless liberals find and make up excuses to defend something so horrible? Is it bad enough what happend at the dem covention involving God? Any answers.
anyone who desires justice and truth will want to know the truth in any situation.
partisanship is a way to keep the people fighting with each other. one side will always accuse the other and defend their own. that's why 1/3 of the country today are independent. they don't like to be played like a fiddle.
one who cares can easily say, let the truth come out.
Jim Lincoln wrote: --- Strange that Republicans can't go after their own malfeasant politicians when they are in office, e.g., Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld. But, apparently it's only the party in power that has bums?
Is it you have too hard a time merely responding to an article about a Democrat, without trying to deflect it toward Republicans? Fact is, if Bengazigate happened during a Repub presidency, it would be in your face from all the lib msm, from now thru the election.
Strange that Republicans can't go after their own malfeasant politicians when they are in office, e.g., Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld. But, apparently it's only the party in power that has bums?
1
There are a total of 14 user comments displayed | add new comment |
COMMENTS | 
Question
