Gay Marriage to Be Included in Democratic Platform
Sources with ties to the Democratic National Committee have confirmed to news sources that the party will include gay marriage as part of its platform when the full committee meets on August 10 in Detroit.
It will be the first time in history that either the Democratic or Republican Party has supported anything other than the traditional definition of marriage as between a man and a woman. The historical news was first reported by the Washington Blade and confirmed by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who recently wed his same-sex partner.
A 15-member drafting committee unanimously passed the language and it will now head to the full platform committee. The issue has been debated by Democrats in prior platform committee meetings. However, since President Obama came out in support of the issue in late May, it has become less controversial within Democratic circles....
1 Corinthians 6 9 Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10 nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God.---NASB
For decades I have been a political Independent, but my heritage goes back being a Northern Republican. My family fought on the right side of the Domestic Disturbance. This doesn't make me anti-Southern by any means. There have been great Southern statesmen. Of course I always considered Dixiecrats buffoons and wackos (just like New England Liberals) to my dismay Dixiecrats turned into Dixicans
It would be stupid for Democrats in Red states -- and Purple ones-- to support this idea. However, I have little doubt official support for queers, Homosexuality: A Biblical Perspective will be accepted.
As far homosexuals being accepted by Catholics look at their priesthood, Abuse by priests which accepts all sorts of sexual perversions. Remember which state the strange Mr. Franks comes from?-- Massachusetts, a state dominated by Catholics.
"A 15-member drafting committee unanimously passed the language and it will now head to the full platform committee. The issue has been debated by Democrats in prior platform committee meetings. However, since President Obama came out in support of the issue in late May, it has become less controversial within Democratic circles."
It was just a matter of time before this divisive issue rose to the top of our two party system.
I wonder how catholics, who historically have supported the liberal social engineering policies of the Democratic party, will respond. If they claim to honor God with both their heart and lips, they must turn away from this abomination.
Perhaps, come November 6th, this will be a good thing as it will give a compelling reason for professing Christians to vote against Obama.
"The historical news was first reported by the Washington Blade and confirmed by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who recently wed his same-sex partner."
To the Democrats.
Deut 32:32 For their vine is of the vine of Sodom, and of the fields of Gomorrah: their grapes are grapes of gall, their clusters are bitter: 33 Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps. 34 Is not this laid up in store with me, and sealed up among my treasures? 35 To me belongeth vengeance, and recompence; their foot shall slide in due time: for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste.
1
There are a total of 5 user comments displayed | add new comment |
COMMENTS | 
This doesn't make me anti-Southern by any means. There have been great Southern statesmen. Of course I always considered Dixiecrats buffoons and wackos (just like New England Liberals) to my dismay Dixiecrats turned into Dixicans
