Children Naturally Pro-Life, Not Upset by Graphic Abortion Images, Ill. Group Claims
A Chicago-based pro-life group has started its annual summer campaign running from July 6-14 and its members hope to show Americans the reality of abortion by displaying signs with graphic images of aborted babies, which they say often upsets parents more than they do children.
Pro-Life Action League members are using their "Face the Truth" tour to send a message loud and clear to residents – abortion is wrong, and the images of the victims should be seen by everyone. Eric Scheidler, executive director of the Pro-Life Action League, shared with The Christian Post in a phone interview on Friday that he understands parents' concerns who do not want their children exposed to such graphic and disturbing images – but says often times that reflects more on the parents being uncomfortable with their own stance on abortion rather than the type of images their children can handle....
Yes I agree . Open up the buried lies, half-truths, let God's spirit convict; do not Conceal His view His pain. Graphic images will reveal the Truth, will bring no harm, will Set people free . NO CONVICTIONS --NOREPENTENCE-- NO REVIVAL-- NO HEALED LAND--NO RELIEF FROM GOD S PAIN & GOD S PUNISHMENT-- nothing but more tears and fears and shame and blame and bitter hard hearts toward GOD and His unborn.
Not all pictures displayed at the abortion mill are of aborted babies... Many are of babies in the womb and of ultrasound images. If you saw me, you would realize that I am one of the most unoffensive appearing individuals there is... But displaying a truthful picture of an aborted child speaks volumes to the undecided woman entering the mill; the pictures might not be appealing, but they are proven to save lives.
Mike wrote: It would be more effective to have signs that show sonogram photos of the unborn child:...
This is actually a good idea as the imaging technology has advanced to such an extent that the unborn is now easily recognized in very great detail, unlike images from the 1970s and 1980s where it took a trained eye to distinguish any real detail from those old blurry images.
Angela Wittman wrote: I have also stood in front of the abortion mills holding extremely graphic aborted baby signs and had irate people stop and tell me they were offended
An elderly pro-life gentleman who frequently pickets our local clinic always brings a camera with him. Anytime someone confronts him or gives him a hard time, he just smiles and starts taking pictures of them. It's amazing how quickly they back off from him, and how there seems to be such a high correlation between people who are pro-choice and people who obsess over "privacy". Then again, Roe vs. Wade was "founded" on so-called "right to privacy".
There used to be a pro-choice lady who would dress up as a clown who would stand with the pro-lifers in an attempt to caricature and undermine their protest but she gave up after a few weeks.
Angela Wittman wrote: I have also stood in front of the abortion mills holding extremely graphic aborted baby signs and had irate people stop and tell me they were offended... My response was that they should find another route to take so they wouldn't have to drive by the mill and see the signs. I appreciate the fact that the "Show the Truth" tours post a warning for motorists that graphic signs are ahead. Frankly, I don't show graphic signs and materials to my grandchildren and can understand folks getting upset. My advice is still "Take a different street and avoid the truth tour if you have small children with you and don't want them exposed to prenatal child-killing."
It would be more effective to have signs that show sonogram photos of the unborn child:
1) It shows the obvious humanity of the unborn. 2) There is no offense to get in the way of the message.
I have also stood in front of the abortion mills holding extremely graphic aborted baby signs and had irate people stop and tell me they were offended... My response was that they should find another route to take so they wouldn't have to drive by the mill and see the signs. I appreciate the fact that the "Show the Truth" tours post a warning for motorists that graphic signs are ahead. Frankly, I don't show graphic signs and materials to my grandchildren and can understand folks getting upset. My advice is still "Take a different street and avoid the truth tour if you have small children with you and don't want them exposed to prenatal child-killing."
weedingandwhiting wrote: Whilst it would be great if we all had your own education advantages remember not all of us enter the kingdom of God with correct grammar. Just like the ragged chimney sweeps and coal heavers of George Whitefield's days, some of us couldn't even read or write, but God was still pleased to open the deaf ears and the blind eyes and still take away the stoney heart despite those impediments! Incorrect grammar and a few spelling mistakes do not necessarily make a bad testimony, think of it like a man with a speech impediment, then you won't feel it so necessary to correct every minor detail in the comments! False doctrine is another matter altogether and that should always be corrected....it appears on the forum frequently and often with the most excellent grammar!!! --- Folks, before we start in with the same old same old of criticizing everything... How about being challenged by what this man is doing! How much Scripture do YOU have memorized? What are you working on right now? We can all grow in this area, I'm sure.
Nicole wrote: Folks, just a random, unrelated-to-the-article comment: if you're going to comment, PLEASE try to spell correctly (if not use correct grammar and punctuation)! It's just a good testimony!
Whilst it would be great if we all had your own education advantages remember not all of us enter the kingdom of God with correct grammar. Just like the ragged chimney sweeps and coal heavers of George Whitefield's days, some of us couldn't even read or write, but God was still pleased to open the deaf ears and the blind eyes and still take away the stoney heart despite those impediments! Incorrect grammar and a few spelling mistakes do not necessarily make a bad testimony, think of it like a man with a speech impediment, then you won't feel it so necessary to correct every minor detail in the comments! False doctrine is another matter altogether and that should always be corrected....it appears on the forum frequently and often with the most excellent grammar!!!
Click on Nicole's mag' glass
Folks, before we start in with the same old same old of criticizing everything... How about being challenged by what this man is doing! How much Scripture do YOU have memorized? What are you working on right now? We can all grow in this area, I'm sure.
Your comment is unrelated to the article but it is not random.
Nicole wrote: Folks, just a random, unrelated-to-the-article comment: if you're going to comment, PLEASE try to spell correctly (if not use correct grammar and punctuation)! It's just a good testimony!
Folks, just a random, unrelated-to-the-article comment: if you're going to comment, PLEASE try to spell correctly (if not use correct grammar and punctuation)! It's just a good testimony!
I've stood out at an abortion facility with the Christian Church before, protesting. We even saved some babies. There are people fighting. Yes, people knew what was going on, but, some of them were Nazie Luciferians bent on going with the evil program at any cost. Satanism is growing and Christianity is going in the minority. Only a reminant who does not forsake God's Scripture unto death, gets Saved. It's in the BOOK they so desperately want to destroy and ban. Last I read, liars are nashing their teeth with no rest.
Just like the holocaust.. People wanted to try to live in a German utopia. Many new what was taking place. But gave a blind eye. Same thing going on in the good ole USA.. An in the churches.
1
There are a total of 12 user comments displayed | add new comment |
Dr. Mark Allison | 1/20/2013
Dr. Alan Cairns | 6/22/2009
COMMENTS | 
mike from new york: "yawn"
