The 2012 campaign has placed evangelicals in a paradox. A recent PRRI/RNS poll reveals that white evangelicals support a Mormon presidential candidate over Obama by an overwhelming 49% margin, but are simultaneously the religious group most likely to say it is important for a presidential candidate to share their religious beliefs (67%).
While there are plenty of legitimate policy reasons that evangelicals might support Governor Romney, their willingness to overlook their desire for a coreligionist candidate may also have at least something to do with the fact that 24% of them—higher than any other religious group—believe Obama is a Muslim, and even more are unaware (or unconvinced?) he's a Protestant. What if more evangelicals knew Obama largely shares their religious beliefs?...
Romans 3 9 What then? Are we better than they? Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin; Acts 4 11 "He is the STONE WHICH WAS REJECTED by you, THE BUILDERS, but WHICH BECAME THE VERY CORNER stone. 12 "And there is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men, by which we must be saved."---NASB
True Judaism is not a religion of Satan. Proper Biblical Judaism is of God. Christianity is founded on Judaism. Proper Biblical Judaism recognizes the deity of the Messiah. Rabbinical Judaism, the type we mostly see today with all its Pharisaical man-made rules and regulations, is not of God.
But Roman Catholicism is in exactly the same position as Rabbinical Judaism today. They have added many man-made rules and regulations to what the Bible says. Worship of Mary, prayers to the saints, etc. How are these things of God?
why must:The Catholic Church is not a religion of Satan because the Catholic Church has always believed in and worshiipped the biblical and historical Jesus. A religion of Satan does not worship Jesus as God such as Judaism, Jehovah Witness, Mormon, Christian Science, Islam.
Mark M:Exactly that Romney is much better to be president then Obama is since Romney's beliefs that abortion is wrong and homosexuality is an abomination are in line with the Bible.
Have you ever wondered why some people have to pretend that they are Christian? It is clearly not a new phenomena we can see it illustrated in Matthew 7:21-23. But why??
Satan blinds people and he seeks to confound and destroy the true witness on earth. Sin contaminates, perverts and adulterates all that may be Biblical, decent and moral in mankind.
So Satan plants his deceiver and hypocrite in churches, and fabricates his own religions like Roman Catholic, Liberal and Islam. Whilst sin adulterates religion to form fallacy, heresy, egotism and vanity in the religious sinner.
Now can you see where Obama fits into this religious fallacy?
Like any bad Catholic, all Mr. Obama, who admits he's a faithful Christian, has to do is confess his sins to a pastor on any given Tuesday morning and actually repent of them. His damnation could never be determined unless this pattern persists until his last breath. Until then, all we can say is that he's a sinning baptized Christian -- just like most other Americans.
The Article wrote: "Obama has been extraordinarily open on matters of faith, providing ample evidence for his repeated claim to be a devout Christian. The evidence may even suggest Obama is our evangelical-in-chief"
"Evangelical-in-chief" OF WHAT RELIGIOUS unBiblical group?? The antichrists antiBible political stance?? Obama's revelations by word and deed prove without doubt he is no more Christian than any other Liberal hypocrite.
The Article wrote: "I know he's born again," said Joshua DuBois, head of the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships, in an interview with Mansfield
Obviously this guy is not a Christian either!!
"Proverbs 29:12 If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked."
Having followed President Obama's tenure closely since his first campaign it has been quite evident that his words and deeds reflect that he is merely a "Professing Christian" which defines most people (double-minded), rather than a "Possessing Christian" who exemplifies the nature and doctrine of Christ. He is doing what he can to appease the masses just as Pilate did.
What is worse, someone who claims that he is a Christian and then does the exact opposite of what a Christian should do or someone who does not make the claim of being a Christian, but follows the spirit of Christianity?
I'm not saying that Mitt will follow Christian beliefs. In fact, I'm not even sure if Mormons call themselves Christians. I don't know enough about them. I do know that Mitt is against homosexual marriage and most importantly that he is pro life. That being the case he is a much better candidate than Obama.