The trouble is in their misguided attempt at being politcally correct they will accept possibly contaminated blood that could wind up infecting a herterosexual. Odds are it won't happen, but if even one person gets the disease it's one life wasted. Not to mention the ramifications it would have for that person's family. It is unlikely that this blood will be contaminated, but the less risk the better.
Gerwicke wrote: "A 12-month safeguard remains in place because men who have sex with men (MSM) have, as a group, a higher risk of sexually acquired blood-borne viruses." Now I wonder why that is?? I thought (officially) that the homosexuals were not to be blamed for HIV/AIDS??? Unofficially of course normal people know different!! But we are not allowed to communicate this fact. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is AGAINST NATURE:
You got it all wrong, Gerwicke. Haven't you heard? Homosexuals die from awful diseases at a greater rate because there isn't enough heterosexual taxpayer money allocated for research to find cures. That's what is believed, and what we may conclude, after the fluff language is removed.