The U.S. Supreme Court handed traditional marriage supporters a disappointing loss Jan. 18, declining to take up a case in which the District of Columbia refused to allow citizens to vote on an initiative defining marriage as between one man and one woman.
"Gay marriage" has been legal in the nation's capital since March 2010, and a group of conservative leaders has wanted to gather signatures for an initiative that would define marriage in the traditional sense and overturn the law. But while the city's charter allows voters to gather signatures for initiatives, the D.C. Board of Elections rejected all attempts at an initiative defining marriage, saying it would violate the city's Human Rights Act and "authorize discrimination" against homosexuals. The charter is the city's equivalent to a constitution....
Agorazo wrote: --- Doesn't this make their actions UNdemocratic and discriminate against the majority of the people in DC?
Yes, but it's the outcome of a process that comes into play when we are erroneously led to believe courts have higher authority than the people or the legislatures that represent them.
"the D.C. Board of Elections rejected all attempts at an initiative defining marriage, saying it would violate the city's Human Rights Act and "authorize discrimination" against homosexuals."
In other words they expect the people to define marriage correctly as between a man and a woman, - not same gender.
Doesn't this make their actions UNdemocratic and discriminate against the majority of the people in DC?
1
There are a total of 2 user comments displayed | add new comment |
COMMENTS | 
j. m. p. from ocala fla.: "what a sick sick story. i'm in shock . i feel vexed and..."
