A national defense analyst and Pentagon advisor suggests the Army private accused of giving classified documents to an online whistleblower was already a security risk because of his alleged lifestyle.
Private Bradley Manning was charged in July for leaking classified material, including a video posted by WikiLeaks of a 2007 U.S. Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed a Reuters News photographer and his driver. But Manning is suspected of leaking troves of other material to the site, which is in the process of posting more than 250,000 secret U.S. State Department cables.
Lt. Col. Bob Maginnis (USA-Ret.) points out that some disturbing reports about the Army intelligence specialist have surfaced....
Mike wrote: I'm afraid real life judges aren't too familiar with the actual authority the Lord gives them. btw, Paul's ways pleased the Lord. When were his enemies at peace with him?
They'd be much too sensitive...kidding! The funny (or sick) irony with feminism and homosexuality is these "men" who are in touch with their feminine sides, makes them more complete men, and in doing so, they become more and more like women. The feminists, who supposedly want to become more complete women, end up becoming more and more like men in order to do so.
Postle wrote: Mike Here is a promise keepsake to help you over that sticky patch in Rom 13. Prov 16:7 When a man's ways please the LORD, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.
I'm afraid real life judges aren't too familiar with the actual authority the Lord gives them.
btw, Paul's ways pleased the Lord. When were his enemies at peace with him?
Mike wrote: Isn't that nice of the judge? They did that which is good, and he praised them for it by ruling against them. Lucky for them that he's a minister of God to them for good.
Mike Here is a promise keepsake to help you over that sticky patch in Rom 13.
Prov 16:7 When a man's ways please the LORD, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.
Loxburgh wrote: --- The case brought by a homosexual couple against Mr and Mrs Bull was paid for by the Government-funded Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). They won their case but the judge ruled that his decision does affect the Bulls’ human rights and forces them to act against their genuine beliefs, so he has given permission for an appeal." Telegraph
Isn't that nice of the judge? They did that which is good, and he praised them for it by ruling against them. Lucky for them that he's a minister of God to them for good.
Cliff Leckey wrote: It was reported today of two pensioners running a Bed & breakfast in England were found Guilty of "discriminating against two homosexuals" by refusing to allow them to share a bed in their home. Homosexual "rights" trump every other right no matter what. What a wicked & perverse generation.
Yes I saw that one Cliff. This is by Mike Judge of the Christian Institute. (Telegraph)
"The guesthouse is not just the Bulls’ livelihood, it’s their home. Surely they should be allowed the freedom to live by their own values under their own roof. Everyone benefits from these important liberties, and everyone suffers when they are eroded.
The case brought by a homosexual couple against Mr and Mrs Bull was paid for by the Government-funded Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). They won their case but the judge ruled that his decision does affect the Bulls’ human rights and forces them to act against their genuine beliefs, so he has given permission for an appeal." Telegraph
It was reported today of two pensioners running a Bed & breakfast in England were found Guilty of "discriminating against two homosexuals" by refusing to allow them to share a bed in their home. Homosexual "rights" trump every other right no matter what. What a wicked & perverse generation.
"Apparently this young man is an alleged homosexual. The reason he downloaded and gave away these files allegedly had something to do with a fractured relationship that he had had with a fellow soldier," Maginnis explains.
So???
As massively sexually-integrated as the military is now the same reasoning could be used for a normal heterosexual male reacting to rejection from a female fellow soldier.
Sometimes it seems that our military is too eager to play the homo-card, as was the case with Kendall Truitt and his "alleged" (Oh, that word!) lover on the USS Iowa, when that battleship's #2 turret blew-up back in the 1980s.
Then again, if Col. Maginnis is opposed to women serving in the military as well as homosexuals, his reasoning is more consistent.
1
There are a total of 8 user comments displayed | add new comment |