Sign in or signup

5,545 active users!!Bandwidth
THURSDAY
JUN 30, 2016
Home
NewsSITE
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
Broadcasters
Local Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -7 min
Top Sermons
VideosPDFs
Daily Log
PhotosNew Stuff!
StoresNew Stuff!
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Submit Sermon
Members Only

Breaking News Home | All | Religion | Society | Tech | Choice | FF | SA News
FRONT PAGE  |  6/30/2016
Choice News SATURDAY, APR 5, 2008  |  9 comments
Intelligent Design foes no match for Stein in 'Expelled'
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP)--Actor, commentator and comedian Ben Stein promises he hasn't lost his mind. Well, he says with his famous dry monotone humor, at least not in this instance.

On the contrary, Stein -– whose documentary film "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" opens in two weeks, April 18 -- believes he's involved in one of the leading cultural and political battles of his life: the fight for academic freedom against an establishment that teaches Darwinian evolution as fact. Intelligent Design (ID) -– the belief that certain aspects of the world are so complex that they must have been created by an intelligent being, instead of by a random process –- deserves a place at the academic table, he says. ...


CLICK HERE to Read Entire Article
www.baptistpress.com

Answers Academy: Big Bang
  START  
  Recommended sermons | more..
•  Genesis: Reclaiming Culture • Ken Ham | 5/22/2003
•  Answers Academy: Big BangJason Lisle | 6/1/2005
•  Was Darwin Right? Part 1Dr. Terry Mortenson | 1/15/2009
•  Was Darwin Right? Part 2Dr. Terry Mortenson | 1/16/2009

   03/14/15  |  Another One Bites the Dust • 2 comments
   03/11/15  |  God Doesn't Want Matt Chandler to be Your Pastor • 21 comments
   01/08/14  |  Christian Post: Warning, this article may offend many Christians • 93 comments
   01/01/14  |  Michelle Obama praises lesbian TV anchor • 17 comments
   12/29/13  |  U.S. Slams 'Conservative Gender Norms' • 377 comments
MORE RELATED ( ) NEWS | MORE..
   06/29/16  |  Kentucky's ark defies science? • 40 comments
   06/29/16  |  Pennsylvania Megachurch Votes to Leave PCUSA for Theologically... • 3 comments
   06/28/16  |  50 Dead; 60 Injured in Instanbul Airport Attack • 1 comments
   06/28/16  |  Restrooms at National Parks ‘Align’ With Gender Identity • 17 comments
   06/25/16  |  Remember me for gay marriage, says PM • 25 comments
OTHER CHOICE NEWS | MORE..
   06/24/16  |  Feedback Friday for 06-24-16 • 3 comments
   06/17/16  |  Feedback Friday for 06-17-16 • 2 comments
   06/10/16  |  Feedback Friday for 06-10-16 • 2 comments
   06/03/16  |  Feedback Friday for 06-03-16 • 4 comments
   05/27/16  |  Feedback Friday for 05-27-16 • 1 comments
MORE SPECIAL | MORE..
   06/30/16  |  Taking Kids to Church Violates Their Human Rights, Says UN • 8 comments
   06/30/16  |  Police in India Rebuke, File Case against Christians Fleeing... • 5 comments
   06/30/16  |  Courts say living by Christian faith illegal • 23 comments
   06/30/16  |  Child Evangelism Fellowship Wins Major Victory in Cleveland • 1 comments
   06/30/16  |  Calvinism Not to Blame for Southern Baptist Decline, JD Greear... • 24 comments
OTHER RECENT NEWS | MORE..
COMMENTS | show all | add new  
    Sorting Order:  
· Page 1 ·  Found: 9 user comment(s)
News Item4/14/08 4:26 PM
Neil | Tucson  Find all comments by Neil
"The existence of stars, fossils, etc are facts that need no interpretation"

I say they do need it. A series of propositions & conclusions must be accepted before even things like stars or fossils can be believed to be facts. That we do not engage in conscious interpretation about these only means we have taken intellectual shortcuts, not that there is no interpretation *required*.

I grant that the definition including "objective & verifiable" is common, but to accept this would be to beg the question, since I challenge the idea that they could ever be objective & verifiable. Even observation is problematic.

Example - fossil: "A remnant or trace of an organism of a past geologic age ... embedded & preserved in the earth's crust" [www.freedictionary.com].
Objection: How do we know it is a remnant of an organism? The absence of a plausible alternative doesn't mean it is *necessarily* so; we simply reject others as unlikely. Therefore, their organic origin (which cannot be empirically verified) is an opinion, not a fact. Only omniscience could resolve this. So while I accept this definition as a working hypothesis, I don't accept it as a fact.

My initial statement is not self-refuting if I qualify "scientific facts" (what Stein is debating) as being "empirical."

9

News Item4/14/08 12:05 AM
Sean | Montana  Find all comments by Sean
My first statement that you reference was poorly worded and an ineffective argument.
You said that you have done no investigation before stating that there are no scientific facts. What do you know of these "formally fallacious methods?"
The existence of stars, fossils, etc are facts that need no interpretation. How these things came to be is subject to interpretation.
You formed your definition of scientific facts (hypotheses about nature ostensibly confirmed by experimental methods)to fit your argument. I prefer the more impartial:
"In the most basic sense, a scientific fact is an objective and verifiable observation; in contrast with a hypothesis or theory, which is intended to explain or interpret facts"
Would you care to comment on Webster's definition of logic? "(1): a science that deals with the principles and criteria of validity of inference and demonstration: the science of the formal principles of reasoning"
Is it logical to say that there are no scientific facts bearing in mind the definition of logic? How and (more importantly) why did you arrive at this conclusion?
I have to go back to work tomorrow and may not get back with you for some time, but look forward to your response. Thanks for the discussion.
8

News Item4/13/08 12:37 PM
Neil | Tucson  Find all comments by Neil
"Saying that there are no scientific facts is a scientific statement"

False; it is a logical statement, for I performed no empirical investigation to discover this, but pointed out that such "facts" are established by formally fallacious methods. It is always false to assert the consequent or do open induction. Just because some unproven assertion *may* be true does not mean it is a fact.

"It is true that the interpretation of scientific facts can often be incorrect."

Can you give an example of a scientific "fact" that has not been established by interpretation? If interpretations are fallible, what right does one have to say its conclusions are facts?

7

News Item4/13/08 11:30 AM
Sean | Montana  Find all comments by Sean
Neil

Having the ability to use your vocabulary effectively is great evidence for intelligence.

All pleasantries aside, we are clouding the issue with extraneous information. My contention is that you cannot logically make the statement that you did.

Saying that there are no scientific facts is a scientific statement and carries with it the presupposition that you KNOW someting of science. Because the statement is absolute, it implies that you know everything.

As the arguement goes: Even if you only knew half of everything scientific, wouldn't it be possible that there are facts in the other half? You can't be entirely serious about your arguement. I'll ask my question with a little more clarification.

Is it a scientific fact that there are no scientific facts?

It is true that the interpretation of scientific facts can often be incorrect.

6

News Item4/13/08 8:54 AM
Neil | Tucson  Find all comments by Neil
Sean,

Having a broad vocabulary logically implies nothing about my intelligence

"Is it a fact that there are no scientific facts?" - Yes, as I'll explain below. Science as commonly understood is knowledge about nature, not all knowledge (which is an archaic definition).

First, to define terms:
"Fact:" a thing that is indisputably the case (Oxford Am. Dictionary)

Now, are "scientific facts" (hypotheses about nature ostensibly confirmed by experimental methods) indisputable? Logically they cannot be, for in making a broad claim about nature (as with laws of physics), one commits the fallacies of affirming the consequent & hasty generalization. This has been acknowledged by atheist philosophers.

Even measurement has no factual value, for is variable error explained by measurement error or unexplained causes, & how would we know the difference? And no experimental data ever matches the ideal equation without being arbitrarily fudged by statistical methods such as linear regression.

5

News Item4/13/08 12:32 AM
Mic | Japan  Contact via emailFind all comments by Mic
Ben Stein is a comedian and actor. Yet even he realizes there is a Creator. He may not have his "theology straight", but at least he is using his limited resources to stand up for a creation viewpoint. It seems that groups like AIG will welcome this, yet also clarify the Biblical points where Stein's production may fall short of good Bible reading.
4

News Item4/12/08 11:17 PM
Sean | Montana  Find all comments by Sean
Neil wrote:
Critics of Darwinism need to drop the useless pejorative "elitist." That term of abuse probably got popularized by Jacobins, Marxists, or Progressives, but serves no useful purpose in this debate. Illogical reasoning, not the existence of academic elites, is the problem.
The term is also popular among critics of Calvinism.
And even Stein needs to understand that there are no scientific facts. True science is an oxymoron.
You speak of illogical reasoning. Exactly what would you need to know to say: "There are no scientific facts." Logically, you would have to know literally everything.

Science deals with knowledge and can be defined as knowledge.

It surprises me that someone with the intelect to use words like "pejorative" would make such an obtuse comment, so I'll ask the obvious question.

Is it a fact that there are no scientific facts? Think about it...

3

News Item4/10/08 5:04 PM
Neil | Tucson  Find all comments by Neil
Critics of Darwinism need to drop the useless pejorative "elitist." That term of abuse probably got popularized by Jacobins, Marxists, or Progressives, but serves no useful purpose in this debate. Illogical reasoning, not the existence of academic elites, is the problem.

The term is also popular among critics of Calvinism.

And even Stein needs to understand that there are no scientific facts. True science is an oxymoron.

2

News Item4/10/08 3:02 PM
Jim Lincoln | Nebraska  Find all comments by Jim Lincoln
1
There are a total of 9 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments
Last PostTotal
Calvinism Not to Blame for Southern Baptist Decline, JD Greear...
penned: "the divide between the convention and working class men is a huge gulf...."
-4 min 24 
Dobson: Trump Made the ‘Fairly Recent’ Decision to Accept...
b. warely: "'it may be laid down as a rule, with tolerable confidence, that the..."
-11 min 145 
Courts say living by Christian faith illegal
buckeyes from usa: "(tmc) the constitution is the supreme law of the land- not the..."
-17 min 23 



Dr. James M. Phillips
Parables #3 Sin Securely

Parables of the Bible 2016
Teaching
Discover The Word With Dr Jim
Play! | MP4 | RSS

Prophet, Priest and King
Pastor Joseph LoSardo

Evangelist Gary Shock
What If...?

Summer Revival
Central Baptist Church
Play! | MP3

E. A. Johnston
God's Heartbreak: Sin

Evangelism Awakening
Special Meeting
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Bob Vincent
Jesus' Death: Our Salvation

Dying in a Mental Institution
Grace Presbyterian Church
Play! | MP3

James I. Gracie
Leaving The European Union

Edinburgh Free Church (Cont)
Sunday Service
Video!Play! | MP4

Sponsor:
Family Worship Radio

We exist is to str­engthen par­ents to lead cons­ist­ent, fruitful family worsh­ip.
www.familyworshipradio.com

Sponsor:
Washer: Damnable Lies Preachers Tell

Another Shock­ing & Much Needed Free Paul Washer Sermon (Vid­eo, MP3, PDF). Click Here!
www.puritandownloads.com/da..

Sermon: Navigating the Seasons of Life
Paul Lackey

SPONSOR | 3,000+

SPONSOR




                   
One Almighty is more than all mighties. ... William Gurnall

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal


MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Android New!
Church App
Kindle + Nook
Chromecast TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
BlackBerry | Win
Apple Watch
Android Wear
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES | ALL
Local Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Podcasting
Video Support
Live Webcasting
Transcription
PowerClips New!
Business Cards
SOLO | MINI | Domain
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BW
JSON API New!

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Auto-Upload Sermons
Auto-Blog Import
Picasa | FTP | Dropbox
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Support Us | Feedback Fridays New!