HUMANS could be closer to pond life than had been realised. Researchers have linked a raft of our anatomical and genetic features with fishy ancestors that lived hundreds of millions of years ago.
They have found that the origin of human hands and fingers could lie in the emergence of a finned fish 365m years ago. Similarly, the sophisticated joints that give us the ability to run, grip and turn may owe their existence to a sea creature known as the tiktaalik that lived in the Arctic 375m years ago.
Even our acute vision may be a legacy of an even earlier ancestor, similar to a jellyfish, whose genes have been adapted to play a crucial role in the human eye....
This article has to be one of the stupidest things I have read in a while. The saddest part of it all is that these people really believe their own foolishness. Amazing!.........
I see they played trump card again. When promoting your theory that sounds absolutely implausible lick fish ancestors, tack on a phrase like "over hundreds of million years."
Allan wrote: Scientists find missing link Again? Tell me when they actually have real proof. All they ever have are conclusions based on unprovable presuppositions that are directly influenced by their bias towards evolution and long ages. Their beliefs make their science. Just like mine does. I however like to base my presuppositions on the documented record of the one who did it and who gives details about how and when he did it. I like to start with answers from the one who does know everything and who was there. Rather than the opinions of men who don't know everything and who weren't there. Start with answers, get right questions. Start with questions, get right and wrong answers - and no way to tell them apart.
At least someone else realizes the anti-science thought of modern science.
Let me explain. Since Darwin gave a semi-credible theory in terms of atheistic origins, the science community has defined science in purely materialistic terms, leaving God out of the picture. Fast forward a century, and any mention of God and you're an "ignorant fundamentalist @!%!*$" while the current theories of secular scientists are constantly being modified by unpredicted evidence.
Again? Tell me when they actually have real proof. All they ever have are conclusions based on unprovable presuppositions that are directly influenced by their bias towards evolution and long ages. Their beliefs make their science. Just like mine does.
I however like to base my presuppositions on the documented record of the one who did it and who gives details about how and when he did it. I like to start with answers from the one who does know everything and who was there. Rather than the opinions of men who don't know everything and who weren't there.
Start with answers, get right questions. Start with questions, get right and wrong answers - and no way to tell them apart.
1
There are a total of 4 user comments displayed | add new comment |
Dr. Terry Mortenson | 1/15/2009
COMMENTS | 
