Sign in or signup

5,976 active users!!Bandwidth
TUESDAY
MAR 28, 2017
Home
NewsSITE
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
Broadcasters
Local & Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -19 min
Top Sermons
VideosPDFs
Daily Log
PhotosNew Stuff!
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Submit Sermon
Members Only

Breaking News Home | All | Religion | Society | Tech | Choice | FF | SA News
FRONT PAGE  |  3/28/2017
SUNDAY, JAN 6, 2008  |  5 comments
Scientists say evolution fits
Facing continued challenges to evolutionary science from religious conservatives who insist that public schools teach alternative explanations, the National Academy of Sciences has issued a new book that outlines the scientific evidence for evolution.

"Evolution is one of the bedrock theories in all of modern science, and we are coming to understand better and better as to why that is," said NAS President Ralph Cicerone at a panel discussion of the 86-page booklet, called Science, Evolution and Creationism.

"We are trying to give the public a coherent explanation of that and concrete examples of the impact of evolution," Cicerone said of the booklet, which insists that theories such as creationism and "intelligent design" have no place in science classrooms. ...


CLICK HERE to Read Entire Article
www.baltimoresun.com

Was Darwin Right? Part 2
  START  
  Recommended sermons | more..
•  Genesis: Reclaiming Culture • Ken Ham | 5/22/2003
•  Was Darwin Right? Part 2Dr. Terry Mortenson | 1/16/2009
•  Six Creation Days: Rejected • Ken Ham | 11/27/2009
•  Was Darwin Right? Part 1Dr. Terry Mortenson | 1/15/2009

   03/14/15  |  Another One Bites the Dust • 2 comments
   03/11/15  |  God Doesn't Want Matt Chandler to be Your Pastor • 21 comments
   01/08/14  |  Christian Post: Warning, this article may offend many Christians • 93 comments
   01/01/14  |  Michelle Obama praises lesbian TV anchor • 17 comments
   12/29/13  |  U.S. Slams 'Conservative Gender Norms' • 377 comments
MORE RELATED ( ) NEWS | MORE..
   03/26/17  |  NSA whistleblower tells Tucker Carlson Trump, Supreme Court,... • 7 comments
   03/24/17  |  London terror attack: ISIS claims responsibility • 17 comments
   03/21/17  |  Paul Washer, HeartCry Missionary Society Founder, Suffers Heart... • 37 comments
   03/21/17  |  â€˜Supporters of traditional marriage are being treated as... • 13 comments
   03/21/17  |  Alabama House Passes Pro-Life Bill Saying There is No Right to... • 3 comments
OTHER CHOICE NEWS | MORE..
   03/24/17  |  Feedback Friday for 03-24-17
   03/20/17  |  SermonAudio Tip: The Official SermonAudio Online Store!
   03/17/17  |  Feedback Friday for 03-17-17
   03/10/17  |  Feedback Friday for 03-10-17
   03/09/17  |  The Foundations Conference .. Rise Up And Build • 4 comments
MORE SPECIAL | MORE..
   03/28/17  |  Vimeo Allows Jihadists and Porn But Shuts Down Ex-Gay Christian... • 12 comments
   03/28/17  |  Mexican Christian imprisoned and eventually forced to leave • 3 comments
   03/28/17  |  Prince George to attend Christian private school • 5 comments
   03/28/17  |  'Religious left' emerging as U.S. political force in Trump era • 7 comments
   03/28/17  |  Mexicans who help build Trump wall 'traitors,' top Archdiocese... • 12 comments
OTHER RECENT NEWS | MORE..
COMMENTS | show all | add new  
    Sorting Order:  
· Page 1 ·  Found: 5 user comment(s)
News Item1/6/08 7:59 PM
Christian life | it ain't easy  Contact via emailFind all comments by Christian life
Allan | New Zealand

News Item:
Scientists say evolution fits

I like to make it real simple. Lets break it down to basic math

Wow, pretty cool, good job Allen

5

News Item1/6/08 6:40 PM
Allan | New Zealand  Find all comments by Allan
I like to make it real simple. Lets break it down to basic math:

1x1=1
This would be a mutation that changes a portion of the dna into something different, but doesn't change it's 'size'. This will always be neutral when it comes to the amount of genetic material.

1-1=0
This is what happens when we get a mutation that decreases the genetic material. This kind of mutation will never create anything bigger, or the same size as the original. It will always loose.

1+1=1
This is what is require for macro evolution. They are little positive changes that can be added together to create something bigger than the original. This is what we do not see happening except in examples where things clearly go very bad and usually kill the organism. These mutations are detrimental, not beneficial, and are more likely to be bred out into extinction.

So in other terms,
1-1 would be degeneration and natural selection (sometimes loss is a good thing such as the gene in a bug that makes it susceptible to antibiotics. Loosing this gene would make it a superbug)
1x1 would be natural selection where traits are simply switched on and off.
And 1+1 results in macro evolution. WHICH DOES NOT HAPPEN.

Things adapt within the pre-existing genetic material. They don't macro-evolve.

4

News Item1/6/08 3:54 PM
Miles  Find all comments by Miles
"A lot of what we do in the United States is based on science and technology, and anything that weakens science and technology for students would necessarily be harmful,"

Those who are blind?

Heb 11:3 "Through *FAITH* we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear."

Psalm 146:8 "The LORD openeth the eyes of the blind"

3

News Item1/6/08 11:54 AM
Mark M. | GA in USA  Contact via emailFind all comments by Mark M.
"The science of evolution is founded on the observation that during reproduction, errors in the duplication of DNA - an organism's genetic blueprint - create individuals with different traits. Those traits that enhance survival are preferentially passed on to subsequent generations. That "natural selection" leads to differing populations and, with enough time, new species."

This kind of "evolution" is real and can be seen in breeding such as dogs and horses or in the mutation of a virus. I call this adaptation; some may call it micro-evolution. This does not prove that: any human "evolved" from a monkey, that species went from one celled ocean/muck dwellers to land creatures (and in the case of whales and dolphins back to the water again), nor that the whole "big bang" theory and age of the universe is legitimate. At the same time it can not disprove a literal belief in the Genesis account of creation.

I don't believe creationism or Intellegent design should be taught in public schools, because the teacher can claim everything from Aliens to Zeus as the creator. I don't like macro-evolution (full evolutionary theory) being taught as the truth to students either. This is why the parents must step in and teach the child as they feel God has led them.

2

News Item1/6/08 11:48 AM
Walt | Michigan  Find all comments by Walt
The article says:

"There is no controversy in the scientific community over whether evolution has occurred," the booklet states. Although there is continuing scientific debate about the details and mechanisms of evolution, there is now an "immense body of evidence" to support it, making it "one of the most securely established of scientific facts."

I think that statement would take a lot of faith, even more faith than that required from Scripture. Although the alternatives to Evolutionary Theory are often not in the mainstream media, I would encourage anyone seeking another perspective to listen to this author:

http://wildersmith.org/library.htm

These are some of the best arguments I've heard on the topic, and have a strong scientific presupposition.

1
There are a total of 5 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments
Last PostTotal
NSA whistleblower tells Tucker Carlson Trump, Supreme Court,...
trueholybiblechristiancatholic: "look: if the devil doesn't own this..."
-15 min 
Mexicans who help build Trump wall 'traitors,' top Archdiocese...
lottie from ohio: "well, i've lived long enough to have seen many people who should..."
-51 min 12 
Franklin Graham: 'NFL Is Trying to Push Homosexuality Through...
b. mccausland: " john uk .. be assured that i both love and respect you as a..."
-2 hrs 500 


Scott T. Brown
1. The Happy Men Who Fear..

Father/Son Retreat 2016
Conference
Hope Baptist Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS

Two Thieves
Randy Wages

Hourly: Practical Instruction for Home
Rev. Colin Mercer
Faith Free Presbyterian...
Staff Picks..

Sermon:
Genuine Salvation
E. A. Johnston

SPONSOR | 4,200+

SPONSOR




                   
It is easier to speak about revival than to set about it. ... Horatius Bonar

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal


MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Android
Church App
Kindle + Nook
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Apple Watch
Android Wear
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES | ALL
Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Podcast | Video Support
Live Webcasting
Events Support
Transcription
PowerClips New!
Business Cards
SOLO | MINI | Domain
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BW
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox
Picasa
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Support Us | Feedback Fridays | Stories