members, click to sign in..

5,811 active users!!Bandwidth
OCT 13, 2015
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
Local Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -1 hrs
Top Sermons
Daily Log
PhotosNew Stuff!
Online Bible
Daily Reading
Our Services
Submit Sermon
Members Only

Breaking News Home | All | Religion | Society | Tech | Choice | SA News
FRONT PAGE  |  10/13/2015
THURSDAY, APR 12, 2007  |  117 comments
Pope praises science but stresses evolution not proven
BERLIN (AP) — Benedict XVI, in his first extended reflections on evolution published as pope, says that Darwin's theory cannot be finally proven and that science has unnecessarily narrowed humanity's view of creation — but stopped short of endorsing intelligent design.

In a new book, Creation and Evolution, published Wednesday in German, the pope praised progress gained by science, but cautioned that evolution raises philosophical questions science alone cannot answer.

"The question is not to either make a decision for a creationism that fundamentally excludes science, or for an evolutionary theory that covers over its own gaps and does not want to see the questions that reach beyond the methodological possibilities of natural science," the pope said. ...

CLICK HERE to Read Entire Article

Was Darwin Right? Part 1
  Recommended sermons | more..
•  Genesis: Reclaiming Culture • Ken Ham | 5/22/2003
•  Was Darwin Right? Part 1Dr. Terry Mortenson | 1/15/2009
•  Six Creation Days: Rejected • Ken Ham | 11/27/2009
•  Was Darwin Right? Part 2Dr. Terry Mortenson | 1/16/2009

   03/14/15  |  Another One Bites the Dust • 2 comments
   03/11/15  |  God Doesn't Want Matt Chandler to be Your Pastor • 18 comments
   01/08/14  |  Christian Post: Warning, this article may offend many Christians • 93 comments
   01/01/14  |  Michelle Obama praises lesbian TV anchor • 17 comments
   12/29/13  |  U.S. Slams 'Conservative Gender Norms' • 377 comments
   10/13/15  |  ISIS to Execute 180 Assyrian Christians • 2 comments
   10/09/15  |  University renovates chapel to accommodate Muslims • 9 comments
   10/07/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Christian Heritage Collection .. A New Way To... • 9 comments
   10/07/15  |  Planned Parenthood Abortionist Jokes About Harvesting Intact... • 4 comments
   09/29/15  |  Doctor Expelled from Boston Hospital for Statements About Health... • 31 comments
   10/07/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Christian Heritage Collection .. A New Way To... • 9 comments
   09/14/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: SermonAudio Channel v3.0 for the Roku TV... • 14 comments
   09/11/15  |  Remembering 9/11 and New York City • 33 comments
   09/09/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: One Million Sermons! • 9 comments
   08/31/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Personal Edition of the Gospel of John -- Third... • 25 comments
   10/13/15  |  California forces Christians to disobey own beliefs • 18 comments
   10/13/15  |  1 in 6 Young Americans Have Stolen Something in the Past Year • 1 comments
   10/13/15  |  Compulsive Texting Takes Toll on Teenagers • 10 comments
   10/13/15  |  ISIS to Execute 180 Assyrian Christians • 2 comments
   10/12/15  |  Choirs Banned from Singing in Area Christmas Show after Atheist... • 55 comments
COMMENTS | show all | add new  
    Sorting Order:  
· Page 1 ·  Found: 117 user comment(s)
News Item4/28/07 6:13 AM
saved by grace  Find all comments by saved by grace
It's Fri.-good morning.
"Ex. 20:8-11 is not the best place to base our understanding of the physical world in my opinion".
The entire problem of trying to make evol. compatible with the Bible is interpretation. Improper hermeneutics is the cause of this false doctrine. The orthodox natural reading of scripture in its context along with the common principles that all bible-believing protestants use and have always used(taught in Bible seminary)give an obvious and logical reading to the Gen. creation account.
There is no reason whatsoever for you to arbitrarily choose to pick Gen. 1 and 2 as "just stories"!
The entire Bible affirms the direct creation by God as Ex. 20 does.
God of course did not have to take an entire 6 24 hr. days to create everything(could have done it in 1 day, etc.)but He always has a purpose.
Sabbath means rest and the Lord wanted man to observe one day of rest in his work week as God gave an example in His creation work week.

"What does it mean exactly for God, a spirit who cannot become tired to rest?"
Basic Bible theology tells us that God does not tire like man(God is omnipotent)but rest obviously means that the Almighty stopped from his creative work.
Matthew 19:4


News Item4/27/07 6:59 PM
Publican | Northern Hemisphere  Find all comments by Publican
I guess what I'm trying to say, Bravo,
is; the evidence that you say you require, in order to your belief, is only there... if you are a believer. If
you weren't a believer already, it wouldn't be evidence to you. It becomes
evidence. Therefore, your belief isn't grounded upon evidence. You may answer your own question. What role does evidence play in supporting what you now believe, that no amount of evidence
would have convinced you of, before?

News Item4/27/07 12:52 AM
Bravo_777 | San Francisco, CA  Find all comments by Bravo_777

I guess I don't understand what you mean in you last post. What role does evidence play?


News Item4/26/07 6:23 PM
Publican | Northern Hemisphere  Find all comments by Publican
Sorry to post again before you had a chance to respond, Bravo, but I may not be able to answer for a couple of days.
You said '... but if I didn't see any of that evidence and the Bible was full of claims (scientific or historical) that couldn't be supported
by evidence...'
Where is the 'evidence' that God created anything; or that the Jews were led by a pillar of fire by night;
or that Jesus fed five thousand people
with a minimal amount of food; or that
He walked on water; or was resurrected from the dead? Where is the evidence for thousands of physical claims that the Bible makes, that billions of unbelievers have been looking for, over centuries, but cannot find? They all claim to be unbelievers, because there is no 'evidence' to support a belief in God. What 'evidence' they are looking for, that they say would convince them of the reality of God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ (the only one we are concerned with), you and I both know, they will never find.
People and places existing, is just that. You may find 'evidence' with regard to your claims pertaining to that which we already believe in... but it wasn't 'evidence' that made you a believer. With all amicability.

News Item4/26/07 6:02 PM
Bravo_777 | San Francisco, CA  Find all comments by Bravo_777
Saved by Grace

“This similarity is an impossible barrier for mutations (random changes) to cross.”

“ ‘...there is no way that mutations could bridge the gap between chimps and humans.’ ”

I will try to check out this book you’ve recommended. In response to the passage you’ve quoted it is only a flat statement of belief and has nothing to do with science. They’re simply stating absolutely that their belief IS true and that nothing can convince them otherwise. Likely the chapter this quote comes from is full of examples of bad mutations and a discussion on how random chance can’t be responsible for complex biochemical structures like DNA or proteins because there are so many possible combinations of the building blocks. It’s the monkey at the typewriter analogy.

Evolution is not a process that randomly guesses at complex biological improvements until it gets something right. That would be like a combination lock where it is possible (though unlikely) you can guess the numbers of the combination correctly. But with combination locks if you make even one mistake you get the whole thing wrong. You get no “partial credit” for the numbers you got right. Evolution works because the universe gives partial credit for small beneficial changes.


News Item4/26/07 12:01 PM
saved by grace  Find all comments by saved by grace
Hi! I know it's not Fri. but I have some time.
This similarityu is an impossible barrier for mutations(random changes) to cross.This is all taken from A.I.G. "Answers Book", pp. 114-117, and they state "Furthermore, even if we accept the data as legitimate, there is no way that mutations could bridge the gap between chimps and humans. Chimps are just animals. We are made in the image of God(no chimps will be reading this).
They say that morphological or biochemical is of no consequence to this lack of logic.
"If humans were entirely different from all other living things or indeed every living thing was entirely different, would this reveal the Creator to us? No! We could logically think that there must have been many creators rather than one. The unity of the creation is testimony to the One True God who made it all(Romans 1:20)."(direct quote)
"If humans were entirely different from all other living things then what would we eat?"
"If animals and humans did not share similar biochemistry, there would have to be separate plant kingdoms for animals and humans to eat." I have sliced out parts here for brevity sake. It would benefit greatly if you were to visit the A.I.G. creation museum in Kentucy which just opened.

News Item4/25/07 10:08 PM
Publican | Northern Hemisphere  Find all comments by Publican
My apologies, Bravo
I should have said, no impression 'on
me'. The God of the Bible dismantles other 'belief systems', by the claims He makes. When taken absolutely, in their fullest expression, encompassing
all of reality; it takes no effort all to gainsay everything that's 'out there'.
As far as evidence, you know as well as I, there are a myriad false religions and cults that couldn't care less about contradictions. They don't need evidence, so there is no evidence
to lack. What do you say to those who just wiped out a village, and tell you
that their god gave it to them to do so; or to that religion whose numbers keep growing in spite of the evidence;
or a people with no grasp of; 'Man',
'Universe', or the most elementary notions of 'right and wrong', as you and I know it? How do you tackle those
people? Don't get me wrong, Bravo; I believe evidence confirms, but that comes in later, for me.
When Peter said to always be ready to give a defense, I don't think he was talking about archaeology.
I'm sorry... am I rambling?

News Item4/25/07 8:36 PM
Bravo_777 | San Francisco, CA  Find all comments by Bravo_777

“The reason other 'belief systems' make no impression, is because the God of the Bible dismantles them; not me, and not the lack of evidence (spiritually).”

How does the God of the Bible “dismantle” gods of other religions? I don’t think I know what you mean here? I think it’s all about a lack of evidence both spiritual and physical. Those religions make claims that no physical evidence supports.


News Item4/25/07 5:26 PM
Publican | Northern Hemisphere  Find all comments by Publican
If I believe the Bible because of what it says, then I determine the truth of it, by virtue of its agreeableness or reasonableness to me. I have found the Scriptural assessment of my understanding and knowledge of truth, to be accurate in the extreme. The reason other 'belief systems' make no impression, is because the God of the Bible dismantles them; not me, and not the lack of evidence (spiritually). Concretely, everything that crosses my path, must bear the scrutiny of all of my knowledge of God and His word. The extremely obvious, is trivial.
Notice that I have not categorically stated that I believe you are wrong in your evolutionary bias. God owns the cattle on more than just a thousand hills. However He has created what is,
will be borne out by Scripture, notwithstanding all of our interpretations to the contrary. For right now, I only find more problems with your scenario, than mine. For the record (not you, For the Record), I am somewhere in between the completely literal and the hyperbolic.

News Item4/25/07 1:03 PM
Bravo_777 | San Francisco, CA  Find all comments by Bravo_777

It’s cool. I don’t think you were being presumptuous. I do find this statement a bit odd though:

“If I believe and obey the Bible because of what it says, then I am the arbiter of truth…”

I wouldn’t say we are our own arbiter of truth but we are the arbiters of what we are willing to believe. I can’t believe anything that lacks evidence. That’s the reason I don’t believe in Zeus, Vishnu, Muhammad as God’s prophet, the 24 Tirthankara of Jainism, the Hawaiian god Lono, Quetzalqoatl of the Aztecs, or that Joseph Smith was called by God to return Christianity to its original Mormon form. I believe in the God of the Bible because I have seen his work in the lives of people around me as well as my own. I believe in him because I see evidence that he is active and alive, but if I didn’t see any of that evidence and the Bible was full of claims (scientific or historical) that couldn’t be supported by evidence then I wouldn’t take the Bible any more seriously than the rest of the world’s religious texts. Wouldn’t you do the same?


News Item4/25/07 12:39 AM
Publican | Northern Hemisphere  Find all comments by Publican
No, Bravo; for me it is not both. If I believe and obey the Bible because of what it says, then I am the arbiter of truth; if I believe and obey the Bible
because of its Author, then I am submitting myself to an authority that is not me. Just as we can see in the reverse; all of the 'evidence' in the world, nay, universe, will not convince me that the God of the Bible is a reality that I personally need to deal with; even so, the lack of it will
not convince me to the contrary, if the Spirit of God has revealed Him to me. Only my own blindness will concern
me, if there are things which I cannot reconcile. Mind you, none of this is pointed; that's merely the way I think.
Perhaps the Lord has successfully controverted me enough, that I may be able to keep this in mind. Thank you for answering what I hope was not a presumptuous question.

News Item4/25/07 12:06 AM
Bravo_777 | San Francisco, CA  Find all comments by Bravo_777

“Do you believe and obey the Bible because of what it says, or because of
Who it is that says it?”

Both I suppose. Don’t you? Why does it need to be an either or situation? The Bible contains the history of the ancient Hebrew people and the names of various world leaders, locations, etc. Archeology tends to verify these Biblical accounts. Cities actually existed where the Bible places them and so forth. If, however, this were not the case I wouldn’t take the Bible very seriously and I don’t think many of us would no matter how pious we wish to sound. That is exactly the reason I don’t believe the Book of Mormon. It tells this incredible tale of a civilization for which no physical supporting evidence actually exists. Nothing but blind Mormon faith could support belief in those stories and I don’t think blind faith is a good thing. Blind faith is what causes people to drink poisoned Kool-aid, or fly planes into buildings.


News Item4/24/07 9:31 PM
Publican | Northern Hemisphere  Find all comments by Publican
Gotta ask this, Bravo; your answer should divest all further conversation
of ambiguity.

Do you believe and obey the Bible because of what it says, or because of
Who it is that says it?

I believe you can trust me when I say that this is no antagonistic question.
I've never given you reason to think otherwise; but for myself, I need to know where you're at.


News Item4/24/07 8:52 PM
Bravo_777 | San Francisco, CA  Find all comments by Bravo_777
Saved By Grace,

“…Fri. nights and Mon. aft…” are good for me too. The fully sequenced Chimp genome was first published in Sept. 2005 (Nature, vol. 437, pg. 69) by researchers at the Broad Institute in Massachusetts.

“One must always take the Bible as ‘historic’ reality…”

I know many people feel this way but I don’t quite see why that is necessary. For instance, the word “must” implies that there are negative consequences if one doesn’t believe every story in the Bible as history. What are those consequences? Do they affect one’s salvation?

“…many false beliefs done in church history…they "spiritualized" God's Word."

Interesting. Which to which beliefs do you refer?

Exodus 20:8-11 is not the best place to base our understanding of the physical world in my opinion. What does it mean exactly for God, a spirit who cannot become tired, to rest? What does it mean for him to “speak” creation into existence? God the Father (a spirit) has no lungs so what does “God-breathed” mean? I believe God created, I just don’t think Genesis tells us how. I agree “day” most likely means 24 hours; my point however, is that it doesn’t matter what it means in context because Genesis 1 is a story.


News Item4/24/07 2:00 PM
saved by grace  Find all comments by saved by grace
First, you said you did not believe the whole O.T. as literal history(wouldn't fit your belief system in evolution). This is an error. One must always take the Bible as "historic" reality(especially there is not reason not to take Genesis that way) unless there is contextual reason to "spiritualize" it. "ALL" the Word of God is God-breathed. There are many false beliefs done in church history in the past and they "spiritualized" God's Word". For instance most the. evo. simply choose to "ignore" Bible truths. You still have not answered Exodus 20:8-11 ???
I will engage with you on Fri. nights and Mon. aft. from henceforth.
Time is of the essence. Also, I will answer the chimp/man example. Caution:beware of skeptical scientists misleading you as has been done many times in the past through purposeful deceit. We cannot jump to conclusions as is also most common and not so-called proof. Evolution is actually proofless (unlike the Word of God).
I'm curious: the DNA has over 3 billion nucleotides. When was the chimp DNA "fully" sequenced?

News Item4/24/07 10:17 AM
For the Record  Find all comments by For the Record
"The future is God's business, and we have no right to know it, apart from a few small details he has revealed."

Actually the Bible is full of prophecy. The Book of Revelation is completely about the last seven years on earth before Jesus comes back. Much of Daniel is the same. There's much more besides, throughout the Scripture, especially about the Tribulation, what to expect.

Not to mention the many prophecies about Jesus throughout the Old Testament, all fulfilled to the letter.

Scripture gives examples also of dreams and visions given to prepare people for certain events to come, and promises that in these last days this will also occur.

This is not the same as fortune-telling or occultic revelations such as the predictions of the demonic "Mary" apparitions, and things such as this.


News Item4/24/07 9:04 AM
Bro. Williams | KY  Find all comments by Bro. Williams
Lance - your qoute

"I'm sure Gordon Banes is having great fun with his biblical physics, but he seems to be ignoring the fact that the Bible was never intended to teach science."

What greater authority is there to teach science? What greater authority is there than God?

If science doesn't agree with the Bible, then science is wrong.


News Item4/24/07 4:13 AM
Bravo_777 | San Francisco, CA  Find all comments by Bravo_777
Saved By Grace,

“…your belief is in the inspiration of Holy Scripture?”

I believe what the Holy Spirit through the Apostle Paul affirmed regarding scriptural inspiration. 2 Tim. 3:15-17

15 and how from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

In my opinion scripture is “God-breathed” (though I don’t think anyone knows fully what that means) and is able to make me “wise for salvation” and “thoroughly equipped for every good work.” That’s what I believe about scriptural inspiration. There’s nothing in 2 Tim. about belief in 6 literal days being a condition of my salvation.

“…Almighty God is faithful and honest…”

I don’t believe God is deceitful either which is why I believe I can trust that the physical clues he's left behind can help me understand how God created.

“Where is all this "absolute proof" that apes and man have 100% DNA?”

We don’t share 100% of our DNA otherwise we would be apes. After sequencing both the chimp and human genomes we know that we share about 98%.


News Item4/24/07 3:52 AM
saved by grace  Find all comments by saved by grace
Dear Bravo,
You must consider the verses seriously you cannot have it both ways. The N.T. clearly confirms the historical truth of Genesis 1-11 and as foundational to the rest of scripture.
I am still wondering as a professed Christian what you belief is in the inspriration of Holy Scripture?
Also, if the creation week was not a literal 6-24 hour days, then you must have the Jews working billions of years each "day" instead of 24 hrs. Incomprehensible.
The Almighty God is faithful and honest and actually the ones to be found in deceit concerning this topic have been the skeptical scientists(piltdown man, etc.)
Personally, this seems like another skeptical scientist "jump to a conclusion" affair.
1. Where is all this "absolute proof" that apes and man have 100% DNA?
There has never been "water" found on Mars but the skeptical scientists who are trying to "leap" again assuming that if they can convince(notice I did not say prove absolutely)the public there was water then "of course" every thinking individual will believe there was also life. Bad science, indeed!
Skeptical scientific logic: don't believe in a world-wide flood even though the earth is about 70% water but believe there was water on Mars even though there is 0% now.

News Item4/24/07 1:44 AM
Bravo_777 | San Francisco, CA  Find all comments by Bravo_777
Faithful Remnant

“Then I guess I don't follow your demand of verses to support what I said concerning jeopardizing one's salvation.”

Do I detect sarcasm here or am I mistaken? If it is sarcasm I assure you it isn’t necessary. My question was not a jab at you in any way; it was a real question and I am very interested in the answer. How does doubting our human interpretation of Genesis 1 & 2 (as opposed to the truth of scripture in general) put my salvation at risk? That’s a major claim to make without appealing to scripture itself to provide the requirements for salvation.

Wayne M.

If you are really interested in the subject of evolution (even if you remain unconvinced) it would be worth your while to explore more deeply my chromosome example. It’s fascinating. As for the typing monkey analogy I have heard that for many years and it is easily answered when one understands that evolution doesn’t work that way. Richard Dawkins does a good job of explaining why the typing monkey analogy isn’t a good critique of evolution. Here’s a link to his 1987 Horizons documentary “The Blind Watchmaker” on YouTube. Try not to let his atheism put you off of the biology.

There are a total of 117 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments
Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 | last
Last PostTotal
Compulsive Texting Takes Toll on Teenagers
english rose saved sinner from southern england: "i will pray 4 michelle this..."
-13 min 10 
Choirs Banned from Singing in Area Christmas Show after...
mike from new york: " brf --- the idea of mary and joseph turning up on the 24..."
-1 hrs 55 
California forces Christians to disobey own beliefs
frank: " jim lincoln frank, i'm sorry you have such a closed mind to the bible..."
-2 hrs 18 

Scott T. Brown
The Immensity of God

Sunday Service
Hope Baptist Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS

Jonathan Modene
1 John 1 - The Light

1 John 1 Part 2
Maumee Valley Bible...
Play! | MP3

Dr. Peter Masters
What Exactly is Worldliness?

A Christian Definition
Metropolitan Tabernacle
Video!Play! | MP4

Event: Jan 15-17, 2016
25th Annual Men's Conference | Dr. Joel...

Crucial Features of God-Honoring Family & Church Life
Emmanuel Baptist Church

Event: Oct 23-25, 2015
Reformation Conference 2015

Faith FPC October 23-25, 2015
Faith FPC

NT Survey #13 Prejudice
Dr. James M. Phillips

SPONSOR | 2,800+


Spiritual growth consists most in the growth of the root. ... Matthew Henry

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Church App
Kindle + Nook
Chromecast TV
Windows Mobile
Apple Watch
Pebble Smartwatch
Kindle Reader

Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices New!
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
Local Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Video Support
Live Webcasting
Transcription Service
Business Cards
Domain Redirect
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
Logos | e-Sword

Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Auto-Upload Sermons
Auto-Blog Import
Picasa | FTP | Dropbox
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us!
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us | Testimonials