SITE NOTICE | MORE..New SermonAudio Support Site! We have started the process of compiling certain oft-repeated questions along with our answers to a completely separate SUPPORT site at sermonaudiotips.com! Learn more about this! .. click for more info!
Early ancestors of birds had wing patterns similar to biplanes, scientists say.
Fossils found in China indicate a dinosaur called Microraptor gui evolved 125 million years ago with sets of upper and lower wings.
The discovery suggests the evolution of flight in birds followed a similar path to the development of human aviation. Wilbur and Orville Wright made the first piloted powered flight in December 1903 in a biplane called the Wright Flyer.
Modern birds are believed to be descended from feathered, tree-dwelling dinosaurs. Some palaeontologists argue that tree-dwelling bipeds began leaping between branches before learning to parachute and developing flight involving flapping. Others say flight evolved in ground-living animals using early wings to power a run up trees and hills....
There were two basic problems hindering human aviation: power, & the attempt to naively imitate "nature" (per classical/Thomistic philosophy?) for wing design. Inventors did not grasp that bird wings are very complex & useless w/o sophisticated feedback control. They might have done a *little* better copying the bat, but they were hard to observe in detail.
Lilienthal & the Wrights succeeded because they saw this was a dead end. The rigid airfoil wing has no natural counterpart, or at least none known of back then. Neither does the internal-combustion engine or propeller (if you discount the bacterial flagellum which they were unaware of).
"The discovery suggests the evolution of flight in birds followed a similar path to the development of human aviation. Wilbur and Orville Wright made the first piloted powered flight in December 1903 in a biplane called the Wright Flyer."
Their "similar path" comparison doesn't work. The development of human aviation is a result of design changes, which of course implies designers. Intelligence, not evolution.
Another Darwinist fable. An aero model of a fossil animal like this must require a lot of hacked unknowns (musculature, feathering, weights, drag, not to mention the animal's "control-loop"). Looks like the "Torygraph" journalists conveniently overlooked these caveats which effectively falsify the results.