members, click to sign in..

5,771 active users!!Bandwidth
NOV 29, 2015
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
BroadcastersNew Stuff!
Local Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -1 min
Top Sermons
Daily Log
Online Bible
Daily Reading
Our Services
Submit Sermon
Members Only

Breaking News Home | All | Religion | Society | Tech | Choice | SA News
FRONT PAGE  |  11/29/2015
Choice News THURSDAY, MAY 12, 2005  |  1 comments
Answers in Genesis Responds to a Listener Comment on SermonAudio

Click here to view the original comment and to listen to the audio for yourself!

Answers in Genesis Responds to a Listener Comment on SermonAudio

The following is a detailed response given by Answers in Genesis to specifically answer a comment left by a SermonAudio listener on an audio by Ken Ham. Click here to view the original comment and to listen to the audio for yourself! The original listener comments are in bold below.

First of all I want to say great sermon really!!


But one big point is left out and that is the assumption creationists have which is that the bible is all true. Why is there God? Because the bible says so and why is the bible the truth? Because it's the word of God. That's really just talking in circles.

Actually, we don't take that stance, we are presuppositional. We take as our axiom that God exist and that His Word, the Bible, is truth. From here, we let it explain the world. Here are a couple of articles that should help explain presuppositions a little better:

Also, in the words of Jonathan Sarfati from this feedback:

No, but this is not our argument. Rather, it would be worth seeing this answer to the charge of circular reasoning. For one thing, the circle is easily broken; for another, the alleged circular reasoning is to show the self-consistency of our chosen axioms-the propositions of Scripture. All philosophical systems start with axioms (presuppositions), or unprovable propositions accepted as true, and deduce theorems from them. Therefore Christians should not be faulted for having axioms, as explained in Creation: 'where's the proof?'

So the question for any axiomatic system is whether it is self-consistent and is consistent with the real world. The self-consistency is explained above, and as will be seen, Christian axioms provide the basis for a coherent worldview, i.e. a thought map that can guide us throughout all aspects of life.

Non-Christian axioms fail these tests. E.g. science requires certain premises to work, and they are deductions from biblical axioms, as shown in this response, while atheism does not provide this justification from within its own framework. Also, atheism must postulate certain unprovable beliefs that go against observable science, as shown in this reply to an atheist.

Also, the Christian axioms provide a basis for objective morality. Please understand what I am saying here-not that atheists can't be moral but that they have no objective basis for this morality from within their own system, as explained in this response. The fanatical atheistic evolutionist Dawkins admits that our 'best impulses have no basis in nature.' So Dawkins makes a leap of faith to say that we should be 'anti-Darwinian when it comes to morality', that we should 'rebel' against our selfish genes, etc. But his own philosophy can't justify the 'shoulds'.

Besides that he keeps on asking whether or not we were thrown together by pure chance into full-blown people. That's not the point nor is it a valid point.

Why isn't it a valid point?

If you believe in evolution, you believe it started with the tiniest 1celled lifeform which came probably from plantlife which came from water.

Actually, it goes back much further in evolution. First, there was allegedly a point where nothing created a singularity and time began. Then this singularity expanded in a Big Bang. This is cosmic evolution. Then there was "geologic evolution" where the earth formed through the geologic time of an alleged billions of years.

Then non-life allegedly gave rise to life in an atmosphere without oxygen and definitely not water. This single celled life form allegedly built up with new information on its genome to get complex information for eyes, ears, nose, lungs, brain ,etc. then man allegedly finally arrived after billions of these information-gaining mutations.

So why is it so hard to believe that gradually things get more advanced through mutations (which Ken said to believe in even)?

First to clarify, Ken didn't say they get more advanced. Perhaps you are confusing natural selection with evolution. Natural selection was developed by a Christian named Ed Blyth about 25 years before Darwin and helps explain variation within the created kinds. Here is an excellent article on this:

Second, we don't observe life forms building up with new information. There are only a handful of disputable examples. For evolutionary advancement, there needs to be billions of these information gaining mutations. Things are moving in the wrong direction for gradual evolution. Please see:

And another thing he said, was that information doesn't come from matter, so our DNA can't just have become out of nothing so someone has to have put it there.

Yes. This has been shown by Dr Werner Gitt, a leading information theorist from Germany in his book 'In the Beginning was Information'. Here is an article on it:

As the word DNA in itself says it's an acid what we make out of it is our interpretation so it's not like words in a language, for which the language has to be there before the words,

Not so. The language does have to be there otherwise the reading steps of the DNA transcription and translation of a gene would be impossible. Even the secular world understands this:

It is often called the Universal Genetic Code.

it's a system purely material which we turn in to letters to help us understand it.

I agree that the letters used merely represent the proteins such as cytosine is C, etc. But one can't neglect that it is a code system. The arrangement of the C, G, A, and T, makes a code that is readable in the Universal Genetic Code. In the same way, when I write a sentence on a piece of paper with a pencil, it is purely material - graphite. Yet, it has a meaning, grammar, syntax, etc where those speaking English (okay American English :) can understand it.

The same type of information transfer can be done with other languages systems such as Chinese, Morse code and even binary (computer language). There is a sender and a receiver of information and a code by which to interpret what is sent. I highly suggest you get and read the book 'In the Beginning was information'.

Even the analogy of the language was completely false because someone doesn't and can't even create a language it's an intersubjctive thing

Then were does language come from? Men have developed many computer languages such as Fortran, Pascal, C++, etc. I would expect that men, who are made in the image of God, could develop a language.

After all, God created Adam with a programmed language in Genesis 1. Also, God divided the earth with a language barrier at the Tower of Babel. So it is logical that God was the one responsible for the language used for DNA. It is not a problem for Bible believers to understand that God created this complex code used in DNA.

Bodie Hodge
Answers in Genesis

Answers Academy: Big Bang
  Recommended sermons | more..
•  Genesis: Reclaiming Culture • Ken Ham | 5/22/2003
•  Six Creation Days: Rejected • Ken Ham | 11/27/2009
•  Answers Academy: Big BangJason Lisle | 6/1/2005
•  Was Darwin Right? Part 1Dr. Terry Mortenson | 1/15/2009

   03/14/15  |  Another One Bites the Dust • 2 comments
   03/11/15  |  God Doesn't Want Matt Chandler to be Your Pastor • 18 comments
   01/08/14  |  Christian Post: Warning, this article may offend many Christians • 93 comments
   01/01/14  |  Michelle Obama praises lesbian TV anchor • 17 comments
   12/29/13  |  U.S. Slams 'Conservative Gender Norms' • 377 comments
   11/26/15  |  A Word of Thanks from SermonAudio • 34 comments
   11/23/15  |  Muslim migrants threw Christians overboard • 8 comments
   11/18/15  |  Enjoy SermonAudio on the Amazon Fire TV!
   11/15/15  |  France Vows 'Merciless' Response After Paris Terror Attacks Kill... • 21 comments
   11/15/15  |  Obama moves to 'increase and accelerate' admission of Syrian... • 59 comments
   11/26/15  |  A Word of Thanks from SermonAudio • 34 comments
   11/18/15  |  Enjoy SermonAudio on the Amazon Fire TV!
   11/09/15  |  The Foundations Conference .. Rise Up And Build • 1 comments
   11/06/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Gospel of John Spanish Edition Now Available!
   10/07/15  |  SermonAudio Tip: Christian Heritage Collection .. A New Way To... • 9 comments
   11/29/15  |  Dad arrested for protesting graphic-sex book loses case • 6 comments
   11/29/15  |  School pulls back plans for transgender promotion • 1 comments
   11/29/15  |  â€˜Christian state’ group threatens to kill Belgian Muslims,... • 1 comments
   11/29/15  |  Black Pastors Expected to Endorse Donald Trump • 3 comments
   11/29/15  |  Garrett Swasey’s Last Sermon • 1 comments
COMMENTS | show all | add new  
    Sorting Order:  
· Page 1 ·  Found: 1 user comment(s)
News Item5/12/05 5:05 PM
John | San Jose, CA  
Article says:

"If you believe in evolution, you believe it started with the tiniest 1celled
lifeform which came probably from plantlife which came from water."

I can even remember being told that the whole universe started out as just a
bunch of know, that oderless, colorless gas that, if left to
itself, eventually turns into PEOPLE!...according to EVOLUTION.

...and if you believe that I have several BRIDGES I would like to sell you!


There are a total of 1 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments
Last PostTotal
Dad arrested for protesting graphic-sex book loses case
allie: " wayfarer pilgrim when rules become law your constitutional rights are..."
-45 min 
Egyptian Mother of 2 Has Throat Slit by Family for Converting...
dave from oz: "this my friends is persecution in its most vulgar form."
-49 min 
It's official: 'Homophobia' now a mental disorder!
dave from oz: "gday jim what was the purpose of tongues."
-53 min 109 

Ken Wimer
Who Is Like Unto the LORD?

Book of Psalms
Sunday Service
Shreveport Grace Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS

Hourly: Radio: Exposition of Psalm 22
Dr. Carl McIntire
Carl McIntire Sermons
Staff Picks..

Paul Washer: "Most Useful Bible Study"

See what Paul Washer calls the most useful Bible study tool in hist­ory. Click here!

All Or Nothing At All
Bruce David Bell

SPONSOR | 2,700+


Christ never lost any cause He pleaded. ... Thomas Watson

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal
iPhone + iPad New!
Church App
Android New!
Church App
Kindle + Nook
Chromecast TV
Amazon Fire TV New!
BlackBerry | Win
Apple Watch
Pebble Smartwatch
Kindle Reader

Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices New!
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
Local Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Video Support
Live Webcasting
Transcription Service
Business Cards
Domain Redirect
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
Logos | e-Sword

Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Auto-Upload Sermons
Auto-Blog Import
Picasa | FTP | Dropbox
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us!
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us | Testimonials