there's 4000 Cuban migrants. went to Nicaragua that rejected them, stuck in Panama that rejected them, now being dropped off in Mexico that rejected them and left to go across us border.

is mr flip off America vincente fox taking in these refugees?

NO!

what about nicarauga?

No

Panama?

No

But Americans are racist because they want control of their border?

Every other nation can take care of their own but if we do we are racist? how long do we allow PC controllers to guilt us?

trump is running a nationalist campaign. that is trying to help the nation instead of the advance of globalism, which is why he is under fire.

evangelicals are having to turn left and use h@te speech accusations along with the leftists causing violence on the streets. says a lot.

for all the gruff t takes from the media and the leftists, its all about the fact he means to deal with the trade deficit, borders, unvetted sharia immigration, the shut down of the coal industry (which is going to mean shut down of power, astronomical costs)

in other words, the agenda 21 that has been carried out through faux wores, housing bubble, trillions in bailouts, decline of Wahhabi-evangelical dollar is being challenged by millions of voters.

no, they already have a hold on the system, the churches, and they claim ownership, they will not loosen their grip.

its the job of Christians to repent of what they made of this country by supporting the movement through the bush era.....

otherwise they will be the persecutors of the brethren, and not too far from now.

Christopher000 wrote:
I'm a lefty,

then....why.....are we doing it again?

word is out, scientists are coming out saying the numbers were cooked.

brown toothed smile wrote:
what's a little arthritis for millions of people

Gay Allen wrote:
before big pharma we would boil birch bark for a headache, now if you were to suggest that someone do this they would think you were crazy and they would just take a pill ...

I'd like to share a quote from early Christians.....

Didache, early Christian, "It is by their conduct that the false prophet and the true prophet can be distinguished. Every prophet who teaches the truth but fails to practice what he preaches is a false prophet."

some of my thoughts.... pietism requires no public expression of faith, thereby only recognizing the non constitutional opinions of a rogue group in black robes. in other words, liberalism has wielded its ugly head through new means, in threads such as this where the covenants we participate in, such as helping a sodomite wedding have no spiritual consequence. in other words, it poses as "conservative" (you all aren't as holy as I am) but really is liberalism --- there is no "truth" here, there is no "theological" stand here, when there certainly is! marriage is a picture of the relationship between Christ and His Church which is made up of Jews and Gentiles.

this could be considered in its purest form paganism (temple prostitution) the worship of strange gods as Romans 1-2 shows they exchanged worship of living God with the things that were made, images, etc, which we can see from the abominable act itself that defaces human dignity...

some lessons on natural law might be helpful, there are pastors teaching on both natural law and doctrine of lesser magistrates. us constitution was founded on concepts of natural law, that is that adam was created by God.

B. McCausland wrote:
Such tyranny was only broken by the work of grace through the expansion of the Gospel beliefs.

there were people translating the scriptures illegally in hiding, transporting them by boat -- that is shipmen and businessmen who were willing to be involved or finance the moving of the scriptures as contraband, copiers with the printing presses or illuminators,, there were local pastors who taught without a license and congregations that met illegally and secretly met with fugitives! there were teachers in the universities challenging the status quo, bringing censorsed texts for the public eye. there were converted believers in political positions that made advances possible to get the Word in people's hands.

and in all this, there were theological discussions regarding the heresies as they did all these things above.

Dave wrote:
Mmmm then we need look at this as a prelude to what may unfold when the mark of the beast becomes effectual.

Connor, all good points, thank you.

B. McCausland wrote:
As you point out the best weapon against social decay in the long term, is fighting the sin from within the church quarters.

they demanded church licensing and indulgances to pay the coffers. if the people read the bible for themselves, they would know that paying a priest will have no effect on the eternal destiny of a loved one.

as much as I believe repentance is essential, to wait for the church to be righteous before we deal with great evil is escapism.

Dave wrote:
Just thinking, should we as Christians boycott all corporations that do or support ANY sin?

the NWO as described in scripture is requirement to bow to the gods of the age as they centralize power, religion, economics, one must bow as a litmus test for all buying and selling.

so when a pastor corporatizes his church, he agrees to all public policy (including now gay marriage) - he is signing to the litmus test in order to move money for tithes to his salary, the building, etc.

Dave wrote:
G'day pennlope, hope you are well, love in Christ is gracious isn't it sister.
:-)