Great Sermon! Okay it still doesn't fit right. I have to go with the no fruit branches as Judas branches. In know it says away"in Him" but if it is meant as spiritual union what do we do with the NO fruit Christian? I think Judas branches better fits johns writings. I don't think we can add a Pauline theological view to Jesus's analogy. John talked of Jesus's disciple too in placesthen went on to say they walk no more with him. 1 john and eating2 john he spoke often of the true and the false. Love you pastor William wow what a great teacher you are. But I have to go with uncle john on this one..
Great Sermon! I get it and don't know why it's a problem. I do wonder though about Hebrew thought back then. Can we even know Hebrew thought back then? Isn't it a dead language? I was told that years ago don't know if that's right or not. If that's right and it is a dead language then who would know what they meant by anything as far as their thought in language is concerned.?
Great Sermon! The mark is a confusing subject. For instance we already have implants that people have now and in 2017 we are all going to be required to get the hand inplants (so say some news reports out of Washington)..so is that the mark of the beast or just an inplants that has nothing to do with this? And if it is the mark then our end time veiw would be wrong given that's only 3 years away and we would have already been raptured. Just makes you wonder how much faith or rather what kind of faith we have in our end time veiw. As for me, pre tribulation makes perfect sence and everything seems to fit, however my faith in that isn't the same as it is for salvation and knowing that God created all that is...so I won't be getting any implants just in case:)
Great Sermon! This is where people get confused. He has purchased 'us' from every tribe tongue and nation'we' will reign with him..is only found in kjv..not in esv nas or niv..kj tells us plainly that the rapture will accure before trib but that is not translated from westcott and hort. Unless you have the original Greek manuscript how do we know what it actually says? Is kjv correct in this according to the original manuscript ? Why does nettles and Allen and westcott and hort disagree here with the popular and generally accepted codex?