Not sure if that first point is replying to me or not Neil, but I agree that correlation does not prove causation. However, we can see coin threads and speculate, and upon further examination of individuals (the greatest murderers in history for instance) we can see a pattern of correlation amongst many individuals that would suggest causation or at least the rational grounds of causation.
Man, for those who don't believe, that first century Jewish rabbi sure had a lot of clout, wonder why? To answer in catechism style today, maybe because he was who he said he was and did what he said he did. He isn't just the king of history, he is the king of all eternity!
Go ahead, and I'll laugh the day it ends up with head cut off like the statue of Dagon in the OT. (On a side note, I do have to say that to be consistent with displays of the 10 commandments, they really should be allowed to place the monument. Both or neither is fair here. But hey, the statue will provide a wonderful teaching opportunity and we definitely know who needs some prayer when they construct a satanic monument.)
Cont... by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door. The eminent Kant scholar Lewis Beck used to say that anyone who could believe in God could believe in anything. To appeal to an omnipotent deity is to allow that at any moment the regularities of nature may be ruptured, that Miracles may happen.
Thanks Christopher. And yes, Romans 1 tells us that they are willfully ignorant. This isn't to say that they are not extremely smart people often or that the theory is not well developed, but they are ignorant and wrong simply. Thing is, both sides of this important arguments makes good sounding arguments and can sound correct. So, both sides approach with a prior ideology. However, Christians admit their prior view in interpreting facts, evolutionists pretend that the facts told them. Yeah, as if those fossils came with dates.
I think you'll appreciate this Richard lewontin quote that he admitted.
â€˜Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a pri
That would be question number 637 on the list Christopher. Not quite sure how many numbers are on the list, but it's a bunch. It is extremely sad how much they have to distort the facts to make evolution look true. What's sadder is that this theory of Darwin's gave rise to eugenics, Margaret Sanger and planned parenthood, Karl Marx, hitler, Pol Pot, communist china (Mao), and Stalin. (To name a few). That's about a quarter of a billion or more people killed in the 20th century alone because people believe man came from apes and pigs. (Not what the scientific theory states explicitly, but the theory eliminates absolute morality, which these dictators believed and swayed ppl to believe their moral opinions, hence genocide)
No commands, but trust and trustworthiness are biblical and desirous qualities. A handshake and a promise to repay a debt means nothing now a days. According to a more elderly friend of mine, he bought a car on a handshake saying that he would repay.
Personally, if we can't trust the sinless Savior then why would we trust deceitful man prone to sin. (Specifically lying in regards to trust.). Of course, I won't pretend that seeing people doesn't help a lot far as trusting them. Partially why trusting God is hard sometimes is because we are such visible people. Besides, if we didn't cons from God, and really evolved as the majority of people are being taught (dogmatically I might add,) then there is no reason to true people who are finally realizing that if they don't have to answer to a creator, then they can do what most benefits them. Basically, catching up to the hitker, Mao Zedong, and Stalin trains of thought on a national level and much smaller extent.
I think mr. Campo makes some valid points as well as 1517. Public schools and universities aren't inherently bad. The problem today is that from such a young age, the religious dogma piled onto a student is hard to combat. I would think it a little less hard for a teenager, but for a younger child that is a scary situation I think. 1517 is right that whether one home schools or not, there shoul always be a great deal of home schooling. If the majority would just follow their own advice and keep religion out of schools... Oh wait, that's impossible. Atheism affects the way you think and spend your time and teach. We are all worshippers and there is absolutely no way to separate that from ourselves. Mr. Campo is making a valid point that we are called to tell them that true worship is only through the cross.
Well, some say it is is a lack of belief and others are making churches out of the belief. According to atheistic reasoning, these are different denominations with different doctrine, so atheism can't be true because the don't agree with each other 100% of the time in one denomination...
Thanks for the well wishes Christopher, John and Penelope. And you are right about some sketchy science being out there Penelope. The world is rife with it, and good science has recently become an interest of mine thanks to creation ministries international. Because if you can get ppl to believe "scientific" (it's origins science, not observable or testable) reasons to disbelieve Genesis, then the rest of the bible is folly and useless. Either it's true on the historical level from page one, or it is completely wrong and cannot be trusted for spiritual matters.
Oh and John uk, you realize that if someone is working in a building full of unsaved people, then he has quite the battleground to glorify the Lord in daily, not just his home. Just some "in not of" semantics.
Wow.. Forgive my grammar and lack of brevity. I realize that that is a mess of grammar, and full of chopped off sentences and false starts and what nots. Just think of it as a brain teaser to put together and I can fill in any gaps or questions if y'all are still curious.
(Cont). Sorry for the length of this somewhat of a tangent.
Talking bigger picture, the end goal looks something like this. I feel called to be a missionary overseas. I've always enjoyed and had an aptitude for Spanish in the two years I took of it. But I feel the biblical model is of tent making, so I'm looking to pursue a degree that will put me in an international workplace to minister, as well as provide my own funding. Lastly, even bigger picture--I know I cannot fail ultimately if I'm honestly pursing Christ crucified in all my choices. There is a lot I don't have figured out and don't know of the future, but if I'm a hobo who preaches Christ crucified or a neurosurgeon who does, than I will consider my life to be a success.
Thanks for the patience, I think I've been properly introduced now haha.