1,499 active users |
|
|
|
USER COMMENTS BY “ VIEW FROM HISTORY ” |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
| · Page 1 · Found: 1 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
|
 7/22/09 2:55 PM |
| View From History | |  |  |
|
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
|
Mr. Dispy wrote:
And the spiritualizing interpretation continues, I'm sure, in this passage, since the Holy Spirit (according to amills) has no idea what he's talking about when he refers to the 'first resurrection' (which implies at least one other, separate resurrection - but maybe his grammar is poor, too).
Rev. 20:4-6 "The evidence in opposition to a separate rapture of the Church is largely that for a single bodily resurrection, for without two or more resurrections of bodies, there can be no separate rapture. Justin Martyr believed in a “general resurrection at which time the judgment of all men would likewise take place.” Hippolytus believed in a single physical resurrection. Victorinus said, “There are two resurrections. But the first resurrection is now of the souls that are by faith.” From Augustine onward, the evidence is almost unanimous in favor of a single resurrection. The statement quoted above from Victorinus came to be the accepted view" (E. Carver) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
