|
|
USER COMMENTS BY UNPROFITABLE SEVANT |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 12 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
1/14/18 3:11 PM |
Unprofitable Sevant | | TN | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Ladybug wrote: it's crickets from some. You know ladybug there is a reason you sometimes hear "crickets" from some posters on some issues and I can only speak for myself. Citing your examples, I have commented against the Grahams and ecumenism so let me use the mystic lady (sorry don't remember her name) as my example. When John UK brought her up, you and others did an excellent job showing that she should not be quoted and was not a good source. I knew my two mites didn't measure up (hadn't heard of her) and didn't want to downgrade the quality of the responses given. I have written many posts that never make it to the SA board because I question my motivation and whether or not it follows Biblical principles about communication. Sometimes I realize that I am just frustrated at what is being said and am pretty sure I cannot respond in a kind and humble manner, because apart from the grace of God I would be where they are, so I let it go. Your perseverance and patience are greatly appreciated, just bear with us who are not as quick in our responses as you. You are very insightful (i.e. the 1517 and Michael Hraneck incidences) and your ministry on this thread is much needed. |
|
|
2/22/15 11:20 PM |
Unprofitable Sevant | | Georgia | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: The Holy Spirit guided Luther .. John Yurich, you have stated several times that you believe the actions and words of Luther were guided by the Holy Spirit. Look up his stands on the Peasants War and tell me that was led by the Holy Spirit.Also, as noted in another thread hera are some quotes from Luther. 1: “I look upon God no better than a scoundrel” (ref. Weimar, Vol. 1, Pg. 487. Cf. Table Talk, No. 963). 2: “Christ committed adultery first of all with the women at the well about whom St. John tell’s us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has He been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalen, and thirdly with the women taken in adultery whom He dismissed so lightly. Thus even, Christ who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.” (ref. Trishreden, Weimer Edition, Vol. 2, Pg. 107. – 3: “I have greater confidence in my wife and my pupils than I have in Christ” (ref. Table Talk, 2397b). Would you please explain how the Holy Sprit led him to such conclusions? Thanks. |
|
|
5/13/13 4:38 PM |
Unprofitable Sevant | | Georgia | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Lurker wrote: Not really, bro... Really if I was attacking literalism, I would probably leave Nicodemus out of the equation and attack the woman at the well, or the crowd in John 6 or those who misunderstood about destroying the temple. Thanks for your gracious response Luker. I guess I was looking also at the things like, born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2) born of Virgin (Isaiah 7:14) out of Egypt have I called my son (Hosea 11:1), the triumphal entry (Zechariah 9:9) the pierced hands (Psalm 22:16), etc. Thanks will look into the passage in Isaiah 24. I will state for clarification, that God is in the heaven and He reigns over all His creation. (Daniel 4) I don't believe in a God who is at the mercy of human will to be able to accomplish His purposes on the earth. You will not find the phrase make Jesus Lord of your life, because He is Lord, you have a choice to acknowledge that but your acknowledgement or lack thereof does not change His position. I see the millennial reign as a reign HERE physically on the earth instead in His position at the right hand of the Father He currently occupies. My main point is that nothing that surrounds the 1000 year reign in Revelation 20 is by anybody here thought to be allegorical, so why do we say it is? |
|
|
1/4/13 3:03 PM |
Unprofitable Sevant | | Georgia | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: If the Greens don't like it, they can always sale their business what will eventually transpire they can sale their business. [URL=http://www.ihcc.org/resources/booklets/rendering-to-caesar]]]Rendering To Caesar: A Biblical Perspective On Government[/URL]. Why should the Greens have to sell their business when it is the government that is overstepping the boundaries of the Greens constitutionally guaranteed rights? Besides the fact that President Obama has given many exemptions to all his union buddies and their businesses. |
|
|
7/3/12 9:30 PM |
unprofitable sevant | | Georgia | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: I don't think the title of the bill was Free Healthcare but "affordable," [ Affordable????? ---- A new government actuarial study finds that as a result of the law, health care spending will be $478 billion higher over the next decade than it would have otherwise been had no law been passed. Furthermore, as a result of the health care law, about 50 cents of every dollar of health care spending in the United States will be financed by government by 2021, according to the report from the actuary’s office at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, unveiled today |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|