members, click to sign in..

5,629 active users!!Bandwidth
MONDAY
OCT 20, 2014
Home
NewsSITE
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
BroadcastersNew Stuff!
Local Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff PicksNew Stuff!
CommentsALL -34 min
Top Sermons
VideosPDFs
Daily Log
Photos
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Submit Sermon
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ TEMPERANCE ”
All Comments
All Types Sermons News Blogs Events Store
RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | MoreLast PostTotal
Sermon God's Way to Happiness | Dr. David Peacock, Pastor
Cil from Pennsylvania
"Thanks for restoring 'preaching' to Christian fellowship."
-6 hrs 
Sermon Hollywood and Rock Star Idolatry | Jason Cooley
Tanya from Lexington, SC, USA
-7 hrs 
Sermon God's Judgment | Joseph Stanley
Pastor Christman from TMBC
-7 hrs 
· Page 1 ·  Found: 12 user comments posted recently.
News Item1/14/13 1:38 AM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Kyle wrote:
original audience.
You are continuing to ignore the key flaw in your argument and you do yourself no credit.
Try focussing on the authors and their attributes - and NOT the audience.

Until you meaningfully engage with your key flaw my characterization (in my words) of your argument stands.


News Item1/13/13 9:40 PM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Kyle wrote:
and by the same logic
You claimed to apply the same logic (although actually you failed in that) to both the Bible and the Constitution.
Your thinking is invalid and illogical because you failed to account for and recognise the different authors and natures of the documents in your reasoning - I am happy to keep posting this as many times as you need me to.

By the way it is quite pathetic that you bluntly repeated a request for me to respond to a question, and then when I had space in a response to directly address your question you then dismissed *your very own topic* as a rabbit trail.


News Item1/12/13 10:45 PM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Kyle wrote:
You're going off on a rabbit trail,
Nonsense. I am going to the root of your error. You have a problem with logic.

You repeatedly confuse
-the two different authors of the Bible and the Constitution and
-the different natures of the two documents and their contents.

In so doing, you are in grave danger of idolatry.


News Item1/12/13 7:19 PM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Kyle wrote:
However, from a strictly legal standpoint, the US Constitution does protect internet porn as free expression, even though the Biblical principle, as you say, makes it sinful.
and is God the author of sin? No!
Well, then let's be careful not to conflate
1. The Bible, which is God given, PERFECT, cannot err, and is our sufficient rule for faith and practice,
and,
2. A document written by fallible man, who cannot see the end from the beginning and would be horrified to see their words being used to peddle pornographic SINFUL materials.

Kyle wrote:
and by the same logic
No! you are conflating perfect the Word of God with the fallible words of men.

The Bible is reliable.

The Constitution is not.
As has been said before:

Temperance wrote:
change it!

News Item1/12/13 6:41 PM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Again,
"If the constitution did not create the rights and principles it protects, where did it find them?"

Please be specific with regard to the US Constitution's free speech protection of internet porn.
_________________________

Kyle wrote:
Speaking of straw men, I asked you about whether or not the Bible prohibits internet porn
Please see the clarity in my response again:-

Temperance wrote:
The Bible forbids all forms of sexual immorality and lust.

News Item1/12/13 5:26 PM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Kyle wrote:
The constitution did not create the rights it protects. It merely affirms them.
Kyle wrote:
It affirmed the principle, the same way the first amendment protects free speech on the internet.
The Bible didn't predict surgical abortion or internet porn. Does that mean it doesn't address them? It's about principle, nor necessarily it's expression in codified law.
Principles:
The Bible forbids all forms of sexual immorality and lust.
The US Constitution protects internet porn.

If the constitution did not create the rights and principles it protects, where did it find them?

Kyle wrote:
No, i don't concede anything of the sort. I denied that it was anachronistic, and you accused me of a straw man so I dropped the argument.
No, you did not deny that your practical extension was anachronistic. You cut and paste anachronistic out of context and applied it to a general principle, arguing against something I had not stated. A clear case of strawman argumentation.
I was not aware that you had dropped the argument. You simply failed to respond when an apology and request for forgiveness would have more appropriate in the light of the 9th commandment.

News Item1/12/13 10:18 AM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Kyle wrote:
What about my extension is illogical
Do I take it that you concede that your practical extension is anachronistic?

Tell me, what do you see as the logical limits of your own argument?


News Item1/12/13 1:36 AM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
If you genuinely wish to have a discussion please respond to my actual comment accurately, and not by strawman argumentation such as this.

Kyle wrote:
Principles cannot be anachronistic. They are eternal.
______________________________________

Kyle wrote:
I might believe your statement if you advocated for gun control laws to pivot on the type of gun carried.
You mean like this:-
http://columbiaacs.blogspot.ca/2007/11/right-to-bear-ye-olde-arms.html

News Item1/12/13 12:57 AM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Yes, I agree in principle with your right to carry a musket.
I reject your illogical and anachronistic practical extensions.

Kyle wrote:
It affirmed the principle, the same way the first amendment protects free speech on the internet.
The Bible didn't predict surgical abortion or internet porn. Does that mean it doesn't address them? It's about principle, nor necessarily it's expression in codified law.
Laws requiring fee men and women to disarm or be thrown in jail violate the principle that the second amendment affirms. And yes, it existed long before 1791.

News Item1/12/13 12:33 AM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Kyle wrote:
The constitution did not create the rights it protects. It merely affirms them.
So the constitution affirmed the right to bear semi-automatic weapons before they were invented? Strained logic indeed.

News Item1/12/13 12:19 AM
Temperance  Find all comments by Temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
30
comments
Kyle wrote:
By the way, the constitution is the highest human law in this country. You should submit to it
or change it!

News Item12/17/08 9:16 AM
temperance  Find all comments by temperance
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
2
comments
"restaurants, bars and liquor stores, which serve taxpayer-subsidized alcohol late into the night during parliamentary sessions. Now the undignified acts of some MPs have brought calls for a sobering-up."

Hey cobber fancy a tinny before we legislate on the alcohol consumption laws. Hic!!

Would the member for said constituency please try to stand up?



Ask Anything: Weekend Edition
Knoxville-Powell, TN
Temple Baptist Church

Play! | More

Dr. Curt D. Daniel
The Compassion of Christ

Sunday, June 30, 2013
Sunday Service
Faith Bible Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS


Pastor James Mansfield
How will all Israel be saved?

Bethel Baptist Chapel
Sunday - AM
Play! | MP3

Kevin Swanson
The Vatican and Homosexuals

Who Will Stand for Truth?
Generations Radio
Play! | MP3

Sponsor:
Westminster Assembly's Grand Debate

Prepub 19.95 +s/h. Papers on Congr­eg­at­ion­al­ism/ Presbyt­er­ian­ism. 12/14 Napht­ali Press
www.naphtali.com/news

Sponsor:
Extra $100 Off Puritan Hard Drive Now

Click Here Now For An Extra $100 Off the Sale Price of the Amaz­ing Pur­itan Hard Drive
www.puritandownloads.com/sw..

Sponsor:
Ichabod
www.barnesandnoble.com/w/ic..






                   
Shame on us for being paupers when we were meant to be princes. ... D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones

City: Las Vegas, NV
Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal
MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Android
Church App
Kindle + Nook
BlackBerry
Windows Mobile, Nokia
Chromecast TV
ROKU TV
Pebble Smartwatch
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices New!
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES | ALL
Local Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Podcasting
Video Support
Live Webcasting
Transcription Service
HIFI Option
Business Cards
SOLO | MINI | Domains
Favorites
QR Codes
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword
SOAP API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Auto-Upload Sermons
Auto-Blog Import
Picasa | FTP | Dropbox
ABOUT US
SermonAudio.com is the largest library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide. All broadcasters must adhere to the Articles of Faith.

Our Services | Testimonials
Broadcast With Us!
Support Us
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Copyright © 2014 SermonAudio.com.