members, click to sign in..

4,760 active users!!Bandwidth
FRIDAY
AUG 28, 2015
Home
NewsSITE
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
Broadcasters
Local Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -29 min
Top Sermons
VideosPDFs
Daily Log
PhotosNew Stuff!
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Submit Sermon
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ TS ”
All Comments
All Types Sermons News Blogs Events Store
RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | MoreLast PostTotal
Sermon A Remnant In A "Christian" Nation | Pastor Keith Sweitzer
Ronda Lane from US-Ohio
"What a blessing your sermons are! I truly hope your congregation realizes..."
-4 hrs 
Sermon When Anarchy Rules | Pastor Keith Sweitzer
Ronda Lane from US-Ohio
-4 hrs 
Sermon Genesis 1:28 Good Sex, Bad Sex: Procreation, Part... | Matt Mager
Denise from Youngstown,oh
-5 hrs 
· Page 1 ·  Found: 145 user comments posted recently.
News Item8/28/15 3:45 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Posted 5 hours ago
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
10
comments
Codex Sinaiticus:
"This indicates that there is a scribal problem with this codex and it is a BIG problem. Tischendorf identified four different scribes who were involved writing the original text. However, as many as ten scribes tampered with the codex throughout the centuries. Tischendorf said he "counted 14,800 alterations and corrections in Sinaiticus." Alterations, more alterations, and more alterations were made, and in fact, most of them are believed to be made in the 6th and 7th centuries. "On nearly every page of the manuscript there are corrections and revisions, done by 10 different people." (Pastor D.L.Brown Phd)

"Critical texts: Texts constructed without adequate regard to the historical place given to manuscripts and particular readings within the Church of God, and relying on a few old, but nevertheless unrepresentative, manuscripts and readings which have lain in obscurity for many centuries. Critical texts are such as the Westcott/Hort or Nestle/Aland texts, both of which rely heavily upon Codex Sinaiticus, Aleph – 01 (4th cent.) and Codex Vaticanus, B – 03 (4th cent.). (TBS)

@@
And remember Westcott/Hort/Nestle/Aland were heretics.
Who contributed to the modern versions.


News Item8/12/15 3:03 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
The Debate Over the King James Version. This fellow seems to be even-handed. I don't care that much if you use the AKJV or the NASB, as long as you use a Bible and don't try to push your favorite version down someone's throat.
I would suppose everyone might remember something out of the KJV, it has history.
The problem with Wade's argument is, like you, he ignores the fact of the heretics Westcott, Hort, Aland and Nestle's involvement in translating the modern versions.

The King James comes from a better source and far more accurate Greek text, the TR.

I might add that more intelligent and trustworthy Christians were involved in the translation in 1611, than have been used in more modern times.


News Item8/7/15 3:12 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
310
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
gibberish
Modern Bible versions are based on the writings of :

"Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) were the two English "scholars" who produced the corrupt Greek text of the modern versions. Their dominating influence on the revision committee of 1871-1881 accounts for most of the corruption that we have today in modern translations. The Bible believer should keep several points in mind when discussing these two men. The following information is well documented in Final Authority, by William Grady, and in Riplinger's New Age Bible Versions:

1. Together, the Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott and the Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort run over 1,800 pages. A personal salvation testimony is not given once for either man, and the name "Jesus" is found only nine times!

2. Westcott was a firm believer in Mary worship, and Hort claimed that Mary worship had a lot in common with Jesus worship.

3. Hort believed in keeping Roman Catholic sacraments.

4. Hort believed in baptismal regeneration as taught in the Catholic church.

5. Hort rejected the infallibility of Scripture. ......."

http://www.av1611.org/kjv/fight.html#fight8


News Item7/25/15 5:16 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
This is like the KJVO types they have no case so the can only attack the presenter of information.
Jim
But God did not use the modern versions to build His Church over these centuries since the Reformation. He used the King James and the Textus Receptus. That is the central point about the choice of Bible for Christians today = Question "Which Bible shall I use?" = Answer the one God has been using for centuries to build His Church.

When you then place Westcott/Hort/Nestle/Aland between God's KJ Bible and modern versions you see four heretics with dubious characters and dubious theologies. That's historic.


News Item7/23/15 3:11 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Dr. James White wrote;
"We are also told that the KJV translators were great scholars, and this is true. However, those same scholars denied the idea that the KJV was perfect, or not to be improved upon, in their introduction to readers.
Jim your denial of the KJV and quotes such as these DO NOT support your presumption that modern versions are good or accurate versions.

The KJV translators WOULD NEVER have accepted the heretics Westcott and Hort nor Nestle and Aland who have contributed to the translation errors and inaccuracies to be found in the modern versions.

http://www.tbsbibles.org/pdf_information/127-1.pdf

"Would it make a difference if you knew that the New Testament of your Modern Bible did not have First and Second Peter? Yet if the total number of missing words were added up this is how much shorter the modern translations are than the King James Version. Is it a cause for concern if in over 175 instances the names of Christ are missing, or if the word “hell” is not found in the Old Testament, or if key doctrinal passages have been diminished?"
http://www.thekingjamesbiblefellowship.com/missing-in-modern-bibles---the-old-heresy-revived.html


News Item3/3/15 3:16 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
126
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Know thy enemy
But Jim.
Your pals Westcott and Hort said that the Roman Catholics were ok, and they believed some of their heresies.

"Westcott and Hort were responsible for the greatest feat in textual criticism. They were responsible for replacing the Universal Text of the Authorized Version with the Local Text of Egypt and the Roman Catholic Church. Both Wescott and Hort were known to have resented the pre-eminence given to the Authorized Version and its underlying Greek Text. They had been deceived into believing that the Roman Catholic manuscripts, Vaticanus and Aleph, were better because they were "older." This they believed, even though Hort admitted that the Antiochian or Universal Text was equal in antiquity. "The fundamental text of the late extant Greek MSS generally is beyond all question identical with the dominant Antiochian or Graeco-Syrian Text of the second half of the Fourth Century." (chick.com)

PS::
Jim Lincoln also agrees with ....
"Both Wescott and Hort were known to have resented the pre-eminence given to the Authorized Version and its underlying Greek Text."


News Item2/17/15 2:44 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
72
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
"I believe it is misguided for fundamental Baptists to defend a version of the Bible based on a Greek text, prepared by a liberal Roman Catholic, translated by Episcopalians and authorized by a king who hated Baptists
Or what Jim really means is quote;

I believe it is misguided for GOD to defend a version of the Bible based on a Greek text, prepared by a liberal Roman Catholic, translated by Episcopalians and authorized by a king who hated Baptists.

God used the King James Version for centuries to build HIS Church.

Jim Lincoln disagrees with GOD on this issue.

Jim prefers the modern versions as translated by the heretics Westcott, Hort, Nestle and Aland.


News Item5/30/14 3:18 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
106
comments
Look at your comment wrote:
(1) Do you really think that God's church only consist of English speaking people???
(2) Do you think that people who use other versions are not genuinely saved? (3) Do you think God didn't build His church before 1611?
(1) "Yet the King James Bible did more for society than simply spread God’s Word—it shaped all English-speaking peoples and those who learned English from it, providing individuals from all walks of life a way to understand the world around them. It defied race, class and religion as never before.
****Today, it is estimated that the KJV has been translated from English into 2,454 of the world’s 6,500 languages."**** (Jacob C. Toews)
(2) Who the elect are depends on God and not mans "interpretations." But if the Word of God is important to God - and we must assume it is - Then God will lead His people to His Bible by the Holy Spirit. God will also ensure His elect have the truth and the whole counsel of God. - (What will Satan do)?
(3) God by His Holy Spirit and His Holy Word has been building His church since Adam and Eve. 1611 Brought the Word into English at that time God's hand was definitely there and inspired that work, to replace the Blindness of the RCC.

News Item5/30/14 7:35 AM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
106
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
"I believe it is misguided for fundamental Baptists to defend a version of the Bible based on a Greek text, prepared by a liberal Roman Catholic, translated by Episcopalians and authorized by a king who hated Baptists
Jim. God has clearly used the King James Bible for centuries to build HIS Church and teach the Word of God. Thus HE has acknowledged and used the TR also.
Apparently there is no need to change to the dubious modern versions from GOD's perspective. God has used the KJV the proof of this is factual and historic. But you have no proof that HE will accept and use the modern versions.
With the input of heretics such as Westcott, Hort, Aland and Nestle the obvious choice would be to steer away from such works.
And use what God used.

News Item3/14/14 7:08 AM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
124
comments
This will really upset Jim Lincoln.

Jim perhaps now would be a good time for you to return to the real Bible = King James Version.

After all it is the one God has been using for centuries.


News Item12/15/13 2:12 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
58
comments
"Would you take a magic marker to your Bible and cross out words from passages?

Welcome to the Amazing Westcott and Hort Magic Marker Binge!

The chart below illustrates what was done when the text used by Christianity for 1800 years was replaced with a text assembled by Brook Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort in the nineteenth century and used as the basis for the English Revised Version, which nearly all modern translations closely follow." http://av1611.com/kjbp/charts/themagicmarker.html


News Item12/5/13 3:24 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
15
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
God apparently used the Vulgate for a much longer time, so why aren't you supporting that?
Or alternatively if you are convinced of that theory why are you not using it?

Remember Jim that with the elect "God ordains" eg God ordained the Reformation in the 16th century around the time HE introduced the King James Version. From then onwards man became better educated and better able to read the Scriptures. Your continued problem is the fact God built His church during these four centuries by the KJV, but today the church falls and fails in modern version times. (IE they don't work)
The Holy Spirit "guides" God's disciples into light and truth and thus builds the church. The Holy Spirit will not use heretics to do this. Hence these apostate times reveal the DECLINE in Holy Spirit works and coincides with modern version usage. Why would God bring a "better" Bible into use this close to the end times and apostasy be the end result? John 16:13.


News Item12/5/13 2:38 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
15
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
many scholars love the KJV -- atheistic ones, the errors of the KJV are numerous, as has been pointed out, to you and others, Comparing Bible Translations--Conclusions, actually the very long article Comparing Bible Translations should be looked over.
The NIV of 1984 is certainly more accurate than the KJV in spite of its free style
Strange isn't it God used the King James Version for centuries and ordained it during these centuries to build His Church. And it worked until the recent arrival of modern versions era.

Today in these apostate times when we see the doctrine in churches at an all time low - and the coincidental numerical decline obvious - The Bibles according to Jim Lincoln are more accurate.

Obviously the Lord should have consulted Jim in centuries past and perhaps the church would have been even bigger today and certainly more educated? Not!!

Then of course we have Jim's pet heretics Westcott, Hort, Nestle and Aland who all contributed to his NASB, NIV and all the other modern junk out there.


News Item10/4/13 2:29 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
171
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
since NIV kicked the KJV of it's thrown decades ago
Jim
The real litmus test for which version is which one does God use.

KJV - Used by God for centuries. Proof the building of His Church.

NIV (and modern versions) - No proof yet that God uses these versions.

Modern versions flaw is the input of heretics such as Westcott, Hort, Nestle and Aland. = NB God doesn't use heretics for something as important as teaching His doctrines.


News Item9/20/13 6:59 AM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
28
comments
Words writes....I accept in a spirit of penance.....
Penance?????
Your Romanism is showing!

News Item9/6/13 2:33 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
29
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
Of course for us who want an accurate representation of God's Word

Ha! Ha! Ha!

Oh Jim what a sense of humour you have.

Modern versions "accurate"

Westcott and Hort's versions "accurate" ????
Where do you get them from Jim?

Jim. You really need to get yourself and your churches congregation to the REAL Word of God King James Version.
Remember that is what GOD Himself has been using for centuries. HE didn't need to change Books. As they say if it ain't broken don't fix it.

Now think about it Jim - Would the Lord use a couple of heretics such as W&H to change what HE is using to build the Church? Of course HE wouldn't every Christian knows that for a fact.


News Item9/5/13 3:03 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
21
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
The KJV was and is a poor tool for training in English
Jim. Your incessant attacks upon God and His work to communicate the Holy Word can only be described as blasphemous.

God has used the King James Version of His Holy Word for centuries and used it to build His Church and many are the stories of those who learned their language from it.

Modern versions on the other hand appear on the scene when apostate churches flourish. That is an interesting connection. But one fact obvious is that the modern versions with their quote, use of 'modern' languages, haven't made the slightest difference to church increase. Now Jim; Does that tell you something about GOD working with NASB/NIV etc etc? Has HE demonstrated a critical veto of this human presumption?
_______

Democratic freedom doesn't seem to have the same definition in Germany as in other western countries. If 'ALL' children MUST submit to the public school system then clearly they do not trust their people. OR They work under a 'Big Brother' government/bureaucracy system. As Orwell's 1984 stated, Winston the hero of the story is "re-educated" to conform to their way only. Is Germany afraid of too much freedom in education and ideas?


News Item8/29/13 3:18 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
4
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
it's the Romish types that have added material into the Bible. See How We Got Our Bible
Ah but Jim, don't forget it is the modern version editors, such as Westcott and Hort, that have "taken away" from Scripture.

Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. KJV


News Item8/16/13 7:37 AM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
80
comments
Veritas Cafe wrote:
Jesus didn't speak king james!
King James Bible speaks the Word of God, the Word of Jesus and the Word of the Holy Spirit to the Elect.

Modern versions speak the words of higher criticism, Westcott and Hort the heretics and Nestle and Aland who follow them.


News Item8/7/13 3:20 PM
TS  Find all comments by TS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
14
comments
Jim Lincoln wrote:
blasphemy
"God's providential preservation of the Scriptures cannot be separated from the doctrine of their verbal plenary inspiration. The Holy Spirit persuades believers to adopt the same view of the Bible that Jesus believed and taught during the days of His earthly ministry. Jesus explicitly denied the theories of modern higher critics. He recognized Moses (Mark 12:26), David (Luke 20:42), and Daniel (Matt. 24:15) by name as the authors of their Old Testament books. Moreover, according to the Lord Jesus, all these individual Old Testament writings combined together formed one Divine and infallible Book which He called "the Scriptures." Jesus believed that these Scriptures were inspired by the Holy Spirit (Mark 12:36), that not one word of them could be denied (John 10:35), that not one particle of them could perish (Matt. 5:18), and that everything written in them was Divinely authoritative (Matt. 4:4,7,10)" (Gary La More)

God used this book in King James Version form for 400 years ....
But Jim Lincoln and his buddy Kutilek calls it blasphemy.
Poor old Jim and his buddy haven't got a god who providentially preserves his bible, so messrs Westcott and Hort had to rewrite it.

Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Kent Clark
Single Minded Towards Christ

Sunday, May 24, 2015
Sunday Service
Grace Gospel Fellowship
Play! | MP3 | RSS

Messiah Baptized
Pastor Joseph LoSardo

Ken Wimer
Immanuel, God With Us

Radio Broadcast
Shreveport Grace Church
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Sean E. Harris
Conduct, Gospel & Citizenship

Berean Baptist Church
Midweek Service
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Travis Alltop
Music In Our Church

Bluegrass Pike Baptist Church
Sunday School
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Ken Wimer
A Charge To The Rich

Message From CD Archive
Shreveport Grace Church
Play! | MP3

Sermon:
Planned Infanticide
Curtis Knapp

SPONSOR | 3,100+

SPONSOR




                   
Prayer requires more of the heart than of the tongue. ... Adam Clarke

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal
MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Android
Church App
Kindle + Nook
Chromecast TV
ROKU TV
BlackBerry
Windows Mobile
Apple Watch
Pebble Smartwatch
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
Site Notices New!
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES | ALL
Local Church Finder | Info
MP3 Play & Download
Mobile Apps
Podcasting
Video Support
Live Webcasting
Transcription Service
Business Cards
SOLO | MINI Sites
Domain Redirect
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Sermon Browser
HTML Codes
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Upload via Email
Auto-Upload Sermons
Auto-Blog Import
Picasa | FTP | Dropbox
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us!
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Support Us | Testimonials