Chip barm wrote:
1) You don't have to be a jock to know that.
2) It was downhill for us all when a Scot took the throne, and the plague of Romanists was unleashed on us again.

Chip barm wrote:
Only when a scone is a doughnut.

that depends wrote:
I am concerned by what I see in the best Reformed Churches, in every nation, but especially in the UK.

The RCC is far more worldly, insidious and unBiblical therfore will be loved much more by the world.

"Jn 15:19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you."

"1Jn 2.15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him"

Chip barm wrote:
False.
Logically, The Oath requires the monarch to either be a "faithful protestant" or a perjurer.

"The Coronation Oath makes clear that the Throne is Protestant: "I do solemnly, and in the presence of God profess, testify, and declare, that I am a faithful Protestant, and that I will, according to the true intent of the enactments which secure the Protestant succession to the Throne of my Realm, uphold and maintain the said enactments to the best of my power according to law."

The enactments referred to are, of course, the Bill of Rights of 1689 and the Act of Settlement of 1701. The British Monarchy official website states, "The succession to the throne is regulated not only through descent, but also by statute; the Act of Settlement confirmed that it was for Parliament to determine the title to the throne. The Act laid down that only Protestant descendants of Princess Sophia . . . are eligible to succeed. Subsequent Acts have confirmed this. Parliament, under the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement, also laid down various conditions which the Sovereign must meet. A Roman Catholic is specifically excluded from succession to the throne; nor may the Sovereign marry a Roman Catholic" (FPC Scotland Mag)