
1,931 active users |
|

|
|
USER COMMENTS BY SAN JOSE JOHN |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
| · Page 1 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
 |
|
|
5/24/13 6:52 PM |
| San Jose John | | San Jose, CA | |  |  |
|
Posted 7 hours ago Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Unprofitable Servant wrote: Me would think that the inconvenience is for grandma, that would actually be a help to mom. Yeah. More trouble for the grandma too who, thankfully, is crazy about the grand kids; but mom still has to plan it and complicates her day more than usual. |
|
|
5/24/13 6:32 PM |
| San Jose John | | San Jose, CA | |  |  |
|
Posted 7 hours ago Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mr b wrote: You can't even food shop. With out passing a magazine with a scantily clad women on the cover... Exactly the reason my pastor's wife was unable to take her young boys shopping with her, causing the major inconvenience of having to have grandma come over and watch the kids while mommy shopped. |
|
|
5/20/13 2:23 PM |
| San Jose John | | San Jose, CA | |  |  |
|
Posted 5 days ago Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Christopher000 wrote: Mmmm...bugs. Especially if the "bugs" in question happen to be lobster, crab, or shrimp. Yum! |
|
|
5/20/13 2:17 PM |
| San Jose John | | San Jose, CA | |  |  |
|
Posted 5 days ago Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Christopher000 wrote: I might learn that I take some things too literally. ..time will tell. I believe that there really were giants as well; the Nephelim, who were the offspring of the Angels that sinned, not the sons of Seth because their intermingling wouldn't produce giants. I tend to think that the Nephelim were nothing more than human celebrities of their day since the Bible calls them "heroes of old" and "MEN (not angels or hybrids) of renown". Not unlike so many of our current celebrities raised in "Christian" homes and churches but are now all but completely secular in their mindsets. Many of whom are also the result of intermarriage between "sons of God" (believers) and "daughters of men" (unbelievers) whose end tends more toward the latter than the former. Just like in Genesis leading up to the great flood. |
|
|
5/16/13 2:46 PM |
| San Jose John | | San Jose, CA | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Murder Inc. wrote: But what drives this pent-up demand where American ladies, by the tens of millions, beat a path to the front door of these clinics? Why was the demand nearly zero in the 50s but by 1973, that rate went through the roof? Being self-centered (I'm told the abortion industry can be fairly lucrative) and short-sighted. If the money involved isn't enough then the abortion providers can always "pat themselves on the back" for "helping women"--at least those women who were not INSIDE the womb at the time! |
|
|
5/15/13 1:08 PM |
| San Jose John | | San Jose, CA | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: If only they had come into the country illegally, in the night, perhaps across the Rio Grande, THEN they would be welcomed. But these independent minded folks from Germany can't be depended on to vote leftist, can they? Sad but true, Mike. |
|
|
5/15/13 12:56 PM |
| San Jose John | | San Jose, CA | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Brian wrote: Camping did get it right... sort of. You see, it was Camping's judgement day that came, not the world's Don't forget that God is the ultimate "multitasker".In Job God proactively dealt with Job's latent spiritual pride even before it was manifest later in that book, convicted Job's 3 friends of prejudicial assumptions on how God disciplines/punishes people, and promoted/established the position/integrity of the young Elihu as a credible elder/witness. Oh, and He also put Satan in his place once again. In Camping's case I think God was not only punishing/disciplining Camping's stubbornness but also the flippancy of many of his "followers" as well as "hardening" the hearts of many secularists eager to justify their condemning the whole (all Christianity) by justly condemning the part (Camping's faulty ministry). Hardening their own hearts as so many are wont to do. Camping reminds me of that prophet who after successfully judging Jeroboam and Israel for erecting the bulls at Bashan and Dan still ended up getting killed by a lion for listening to what he thought was Godly prophecy and took food when he was initially told not to. Camping also reminds me of David and his census, where Israel bore the brunt of his sin. |
|
|
5/14/13 2:44 PM |
| San Jose John | | San Jose, CA | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
There's always Exodus 20:11 and Exodus 31:17 where our LITERAL 7-day week is defined by God himself, using his own timetable (time he took to create the universe) as a reference.All other major time periods that I can think of are referenced to the rotation of heavenly bodies (day, month, year). Only other possible way I'm aware of that one can use to define a week is to divide the time it takes for the earth to revolve around the sun by 52, but this is a very oblique way to do so if one denies the literal 6-day creation account. As for Barry's question, my own denomination (OPC) is rife with old-earthers (in fact I'm told that even our FOUNDER, Dr. J.G.Mechan had similar beliefs). Still, I haven't found it to be a significantly divisive doctrine. Baptism, Sabbath, and communion issues tend to be more troublesome than differing views of creation and eschatology. At least in our church this appears to be the case. |
|
|
|
|
|

|

|