http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Wall_of_China

http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/gyzg/t192319.htm

http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_092

This quote was particularly revealing "From a low orbit of the earth, many artificial objects are visible on the earth, such as highways, ships in the sea, railroads, cities, fields of crops, and even some individual buildings. While at a low orbit, the Great Wall of China can certainly be seen from space but it is not unique in that regard.

However, when leaving the earth's orbit and acquiring an altitude of more than a few thousand miles, no man-made objects are visible at all. NASA says, "The Great Wall can barely be seen from the Shuttle, so it would not be possible to see it from the Moon with the naked eye." Thus, it'd be tough to spot the Great Wall of China or any other object from the moon. Furthermore, from the moon, even the continents are barely visible."

So any group that quotes from a completely unaffiliated group in which the unaffiliated group produces some information that is generally accepted by the public, but said information has been shown by another outside source to be incorrect, is goofy?

I hate to quibble, but if my remembrance of the six days serves me, the fifth day saw the creation of fowl and fish after their kind. Are four-legged serpants now to be included in that mix?