|
|
USER COMMENTS BY LONDONDERRRY |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 20 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
5/17/12 6:10 PM |
londonderrry | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
westy wrote: Well then, Love your enemy does apply then! Hi Westy. I'm not 'bent on accusing her' but I find some of her actions very repugnant. I have no affiliation with this church or know a single person who has ever attended. If the minister is dispensationalist, than that is very sad indication of the times we live in today. And if he has lied about why he brought the lawsuit, that too is troubling. I just don't know if this information is true. Can you point me to one of the pastor's dispensational sermons online? Notwithstanding, I find Julie Anne's numerous insinuations of sexual sin very disturbing and worthy of condemnation. I certainly think that if someone was making unfounded accusations of this heinous nature against me or a member of my family, that a legal recourse might be the most godly course of action, when all else fails. Loving our enemies does not mean an absence of justice and while, it may not have been the wisest course of action, I think Julie Anne has much to answer for. |
|
|
5/17/12 4:21 PM |
londonderrry | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
westy wrote: She did not bring a law suit against the Church or the Pastor... Dispy's ARE a cult... Hi Westy. Paul's purpose in 1 Corinthians 6 is that the people of God ought to settle their disputes within the confines of the Christian community. It seems clear to me that Julie Anne Smith was the initiator. She brought her dispute with the church into the public arena by posting comments about the church on a secular website. It appears to me (as I quoted Julie below) that these accusations of hers involved insinuations of sexual sins, which she has not proven. Not only that, but it seems that Julie persisted in making these sort of accusations over and over again. If these accusations are only malicious lies, than Julie doesn't appear to be much of a Christian and the prohibitions in 1 Corinthians 6 wouldn't apply. BTW, what is a 'Dispy'... a dispensationalist? |
|
|
5/17/12 1:31 PM |
londonderrry | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
westy wrote: I wouldn't be so quick to crucify this lady. "Pastor" is clearly going against scripture. Hi Westy. I don't know the Pastor or church in question, apart from the statement of faith written on the church website (which appeared to be orthodox.) What concerns me is that this woman is making sexual accusations via insinuations. I've been in a church before where I was virtually shunned and know the hurt that it can cause. I still wouldn't call that church a 'cult' because it did preach the gospel, even though we had differences on other issues such as images of Jesus and such. It may be the case that the Pastor is difficult, that there is a lack of love present and that they are not demonstrating love properly. I don't know. Even if all this was true, making sexual insinuations and calling the church a cult is beyond unacceptable as it it calling the ministry of the Word into disrepute. Reading some of Julie Anne's blog, it seems apparent that this is more of a personal issue, than a doctrinal issue and should never have been brought into the public arena through her numerous public attacks on this church and it's pastor. |
|
|
11/23/10 9:49 AM |
londonderrry | | Northern Ireland | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Hi Lurker, The saints of G-d are daily involved in spiritual warfare. 'This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare.' I Timothy 1:18. Also, 'the Word of G-d is quick , and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.' The church is engaged on a daily basis in spiritual warefare and ultimately 'the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints to execute judgment upon all...' Jude 1:14-15 I can sing Psalm 149 in this spirit. If someone cannot sing these verses then it only goes to show the disturbing effect that man made hymns have had in forming the shallow theology of most 'evangelical' churches. |
|
|
11/21/10 4:26 PM |
londonderrry | | Northern Ireland | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Hi Jim. I do sing the Psalms and I would agree with your post. Sadly there are many exclusive psalmist churches where the women dress immodestly and without headcoverings and where they use versions of the Bible, such as the NIV where verses are ripped out of the Scriptures (Matthew 12:47, 17:21, etc.) Singing the Psalms exclusively is certainly not proof that a church is scripturally solid. At the same time, it doesn't mean that psalm singing leads to false doctrine. I would argue just the opposite. When churches apostastize, they normally move in the opposite direction, such as the Free Church of Scotland. The church I think you are referring to in Ireland is also slowly moving away from exclusive psalmody in that members sing hymns outside of the worship service. Sadly, it too may abandon exclusive psalmody someday, because churches only move closer to G-d's Word or further away. That's why you almost never find apostate churches suddenly adopting exclusive psalmody. Just the opposite happens, they almost always abandon the Psalms for hymns. Why? I think there are lots of evangelicals that love to argue against exclusive psalmody, but who have never used a Psalter in their life. I think the best proof for singing the Psalms is to pick up a Psalter and sing to G-d. |
|
|
11/21/10 11:52 AM |
londonderrry | | Northern Ireland | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Michael, Part 2 to my earlier post.Luther was most certainly a mighty man of G-d whom G-d used to start the Protestant Reformation, but he of course did not completely follow the Reformed view on worship, in that he permitted hymns of human composition. At the same time, he did not approve of the use of organs, going so far as to say 'The organ in the worship service is a sign of Baal.' In contrast to the Luthern church, the Reformers in Switzerland, the Netherlands and the British Isles, largely promoted the exlusive use of the Psalter in the worship of G-d. Most presbyterian and reformed churches continued this biblical tradition of going back to the Scriptures for our worship and songs until the 19th century. Having said that, Martin Luther promoted the use of the psalter in worship, actually putting metrical psalms to tune and incorporating them into the Lutheran worship service. Luther's preface to the 1545 Luthern Psalter sums it up so well: 'Every Christian... ought, in all reason, to make the Psalter his manual... For indeed the truth is, that everything that a pious heart can desire to ask in prayer, it here finds Psalms and words to match, so aptly and sweetly, that no man—no, nor all the men in the world—shall be able to devise forms of words so good and devout.' |
|
|
11/21/10 5:19 AM |
londonderrry | | Northern Ireland | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"What's the difference between a man who writes a Biblical Sermon and a man who writes a Biblical Hymn?" Biblical mandate. Scripture commands (2 Tim. 4:2) the man of G-d to preach and teach, but we have no such command to compose our own hymns. Regardless of someone may feel, it's indisputable that a Psalm is superior in everyway to the very best of man made hymns. If G-d has given us a divinely written hymnal, then with what biblical warrant do we add to His hymnal with our own songs? The Hebrews practised exclusive psalmody as did the ancient church and the reformers of the reformation, so why change the divine hymns used during the most glorious ages of the church for hymns written by fallible men. One other point, many, many hymns were written by arminians, arians, pelagians, catholics, homosexuals and other heretics of every sect. Very often these writers imposed their false doctrine into hymns. It has been said that heresy very often has been sung into the hearts of the church through the use of uninspired hymns and it is so true today. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|