And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. (?Revelation? ?13?:?16-17? KJV)
For security purposes there will have to be an incorporation of some sort of biometrics.
Shame on them. Though not surprising. Not only is the act physically opposed to how God created us, but it is not the way He designed us emotionally. Women taking on a masculine persona and men behaving feminine is also sinful. This behavior shouldn't be endorsed by any so called Church.
The idea that homosexuality is a sin is not a first century view for one because it was practiced in ancient cultures like Greece and Rome. Another thing, God's word on homosexuality hasn't changed and never will. It is an abomination to Him.
I think this lady shouldn't have to serve the gay guys playing marriage. However, I do wonder if she compromised the Faith previously by serving at any gay pride events for this man. Could compromises in the past have led to this moment and does she comprise when it comes to baking cakes for adulterers?
No matter how people feel about Franklin Graham, he is one of the few voices in the public still out there who has consistently been calling sin a sin. One of my concerns is with him is that sometimes he will recant and apologize for speaking the truth.
What is so irritating about this is, the new fire chief must have some kind of biases also. Surely he must think it is wrong to speed or drink and drive. I don't see him getting fired and accused of causing a hostile environment to those who behave badly. To take it a step further because drinking and driving is a crime and homosexuality isn't, what if he is a democrat? Will he be willing to work to save the lives of republicans even though he disagrees with them? Then why not keep the old fire chief who worked to keep all people safe also?