Gangbanger wrote: All Popes, All Archbishops, All Cardinals, All Priests are homosexual fruitcake Gay murders.
False. Not every Catholic priest is a homosexual. Only a small percentage of Catholic priests are homosexual. At my previous Catholic parish(I recently moved to another town 20 miles away) no priest in the history of that parish has been homosexual.
US, How many times do I have to state this before you grasp it? I DON'T PARTAKE IN ANY OF THE UNSCRIPTURAL PARTS TO THE MASS. And I AM NOT STILL PARTAKING THE RCC ROAD TO SALVATION since I accept the biblical doctrine of salvation that salvation comes only through embracing Jesus as Savior and trusting entirely in Him alone for salvation. The only thing I ever stated about the Catholic Sacrament of marriage is that I plan on marrying a Catholic woman. As to future children. I never stated I would have them sprinkled. I stated I would have them immersed(the biblical form of Baptism). The Catholic Church permits immersion as a form of Baptism for babies and older individuals being Baptized. It has not been a quarter of a century since I embraced Jesus as Savior and started trusting entirely in Him alone for salvation. It was in November 1997 when that took place. If I was not really Born Again and guided by the Holy Spirit would I have the ability to know there are unscriptural Catholic doctrines and unscriptural parts to the Mass? No I would not because it is impossible for someone not guided by the Holy Spirit to know those things.
Kev, No, a Jehovah's Witness or Mormon can't say the Apostles and Nicene Creeds because they deny that Jesus is God.
B. Warely wrote: "Hillary Clinton led a mayor, a governor, a phalanx of aides, a crush of reporters and several beleaguered security personnel on a 15-minute stroll." As long as this evil woman is not allowed to lead America her stroll along the queer road is irrelevant to normal and historic moral standards. Perhaps the point here is loudly made that Democrats are just as amoral as Sodom and Gomorrah and are heading for the fire and brimstone weather. "Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God." 1Corinthians 6:9 ESV
The only way to prevent Clinton from getting into the White House is for every conservative to vote for Trump. That is the only way because voting for a third party presidential candidate is giving votes to Clinton. And besides a third party candidate for president stands zero chance of winning.
It is either Clinton or Trump who will be the president because a third party candidate for president does not stand a ghost of a chance of winning the presidency at the present time in history. So Trump is the only candidate that conservatives should vote for.
Francis is a total whack job and should resign and be replaced with a Pope who is conservative, would be against abortion, homosexuality and artificial birth control and would tell the Bishops to tell Catholics who support abortion, homosexuality and artificial birth control to either fall in line with Catholic teaching and be against abortion, homosexuality and artificial birth control or be excommunicated from the Catholic Church. I don't pay attention to anything Francis states anymore.
Jim Lincoln wrote: no one would consider the Donald a preacher he is a serial polygamist. He has some other dubious ideas as well , Donald Trump's Immoral Idea For Financing The Mexican Border Wall if you are using an Android device to try to read this Forbes article - - try Chrome the Forbes site is not the easiest one to read with a mobile device.
So you and some of the other individuals on here would rather have Clinton(Who supports abortion, homosexuality and every other perversion that God is against) in the White House over a Republican like Trump who states he is against abortion, homosexuality and who will be a better president than Clinton?
1517 wrote: To side with Trump is based on illogic and gross presumption. Trump has been flying his true colors throughout his life and during the primaries. Just because he is the REPUPLICAN nominee doesn't make him a better choice. I believe his and Clinton's nominations is a trial set in place for Christians. If looking at these two " nominees" doesn't give believers pause and prompts us to evaluate who we REALLY depend upon, then we have lost focus.
Trump states he is against abortion and homosexuality, which automatically makes him better than Clinton. As a registered Republican I naturally am going to vote for Trump because I am a Republican.
S.Taylor wrote: How morally corrupt does a candidate need to be before Christians can't in good conscience vote for him? I think we need to ask this question; or has moral relativism infected us all too?
You would rather have Clinton in the White House over a Republican? Remember a third party candidate for president has zero chance of winning the presidency.
Buckeyes wrote: This is the height of hypocrisy. How Trump can call Hillary a world class liar and question her Christianity without looking in the mirror is beyond me. Trumpâs professed Christianity is the exact embodiment of the heretical teaching of his mentor Norman Vincent Peale. As for his honesty his reputation precedes him. Trumpâs unrepentant arrogance has completely blinded him to his sin and faults. Sadly this delusional view of things is not only dangerous but will take him straight to hell. I understand why some people will hold their nose and vote for this miserable man, but I will not join them. They are just voting for a âslowerâ form of destruction. Pro 16:18 Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
So you would rather have Clinton in the White House over a Republican like Trump? That is totally illogical.
I like classical music. I also like opera music, country music(not the songs that glorify drinking, adultery and other sins) that is about the old west, cowboys, farming and farm life. And I also like bluegrass music, country gospel music, gospel music, Hawaiian music and easy listening music like Crosby, Como, Nat King Cole, Mills Brothers, Jim Nabors, etc.
NeedHim wrote: John Y the Biblical doctrine of Grace & Justification are Heaven & Hell issues, not the myth of purgatory. John Y this are issues that deal specifically in the person of Christ & His finished works. Canon 11. If anyone says that men are justified either by the sole imputation of the justice of Christ or by the sole remission of sins, excluding grace and charity which is poured into their hearts by the Holy Spirit and inheres in them, or also that the grace which justifies us is only the favour of God, let him be anathema. In which goes against Rom 4:4-6, Rom 5:9,& v-19.
Yes of course Purgatory is non existent. But the fact is that the Catholic Church has always believed in and worshiped the biblical and historical Jesus as God. That states so in the Apostles and Nicene Creeds which is the Statement of Faith of the Catholic Church. Even the most Anti Catholic Protestant ministers have acknowledged the Catholic Church worships the biblical and historical Jesus as God. And I accept the biblical doctrine of Grace and Justification that salvation comes only through embracing Jesus as ones Savior and Lord and trusting entirely in Him alone for salvation. If I did not believe that I would not have embraced Him as Savior and Lord.
NeedHim wrote: John Y,Rome Jesus doesn't save & justify one by His merits alone.
Can't you grasp it that the Statement of Faith of the Catholic Church(The Apostles and Nicene Creeds) states "We believe in One Lord Jesus Christ the only begotten Son of God", which is the biblical and historical Jesus the Catholic Church has always believed in and worshiped as God. Even Luther and all the Protestant Reformers who were under the guidance of the Holy Spirit stated the Catholic Church worships the biblical and historical Jesus as God and never stated the erroneous statement that the Catholic Church worships another Jesus. The most Anti Catholic Evangelical Protestant ministers have stated the Catholic Church worships the biblical and historical Jesus.
Connor, I don't believe the Virgin Mary remained a Virgin but had other children with Saint Joseph. And I accept the creation account in Genesis as the way creation took place.
NeedHim wrote: John Y with all due respect towards you, Rome teaches another Jesus.
The Apostles and Nicene Creeds(The Statement of Faith of the Catholic Church) states "We believe in One Lord Jesus Christ the only begotten Son of God(The biblical and historical Jesus), meaning the Catholic Church believes in and worships the biblical and historical Jesus as God and not another Jesus.
Connor wrote: Also john, you're painting all Catholics with the same brush, "Catholics have always believed and worshiped Jesus as God." John I want you to think about this, (I'm not trying to be sarcastic or show you up,) you could not possibly prove your statement or know it to be true, I'm a independent, fundamental, temperamental, right winged, chicken wing eaten Baptist, I wouldn't say that about Baptist have always believed and worshiped Jesus as God, because I could never know that. All those who do not bear fruit do not have the Spirit, all those that don't have the Spirit, are not of God but are the enemies of Jesus.
Every practicing Catholic who attends the Catholic Church worships Jesus as God. The Apostles and Nicene Creeds(The Statement of Faith of the Catholic Church) states "We believe in One Lord Jesus Christ the only begotten Son of God"(The biblical and historical Jesus), which means the Catholic Church and Catholics have always worshiped the biblical and historical Jesus as God.
Jim Lincoln wrote: No telling what happens in a Romish Church unofficially, John.
What nonsense that you believe that there are homosexual marriage ceremonies taking place without a state issued marriage license in any Catholic Church. That is just plain nonsense. Nobody in their right mind would believe that. If there are homosexual marriage ceremonies taking place without a state issued marriage license taking place in any Catholic Church that would be front page news. But since there has not been any news about such a marriage ceremony taking place then no such marriage ceremony has taken place in any Catholic Church.
Dave wrote: Ok, well they're no different to any other anti Christ religion, ie :Islam, Mormon,jo'hoes,sda, Hinduism,RCC. They are all a deception from Satan! Buddha and the UN.
What nonsense equating Roman Catholicism with religions that don't worship Jesus as God. Roman Catholicism worships Jesus as God and thus has nothing in common with the religions that don't worship Jesus as God.
As important as church attendance is, it has to be remembered that nowhere in the Bible is church attendance in any church including an Evangelical Church equated with salvation and entering Heaven upon ones demise. But there is at least one Evangelical Protestant on here who has stated that church attendance at an Evangelical Church is required for salvation and entering Heaven upon ones demise which is totally against the Bible and the teachings of Jesus. Jesus will not look at the church that one attended in determining who enters Heaven. He will only look at who had embraced Him as their Savior and Lord and trusted in Him alone for salvation. Which means that a Catholic who has embraced Jesus as their Savior and Lord and trusts entirely in Him alone for salvation does not have to leave the Catholic Church and unite with an Evangelical Church in order to be saved and go to Heaven.