Strange as it may seem, Denmark doesn't rate that high on Internet connection speed, which can be seen below. The United States of course, has a hard time ranking even in the top 10 when it comes down to internet speeds. The most of us, that sure doesn't come as a surprise.
This is an interesting quote from a bishop all the Catholic lite version Church, " JOHN HARROWER: Now it took them to 2004, you know, it wasn't easy to get there. And so with the royal commission, it's one of the things that I would commend to be encouraging of institutions to look beyond our institutional survival and our fear of you know, litigation, that somebody's going to take us to the cleaners, to be concerned for one and other as human beings.". Excerpt from, Tasmanian bishop disappointed with Hutchins' response to abuse survivor ..
The article that I posted in the previous message is quite good -- one four letter word in it, wasn't appreciated. Some of the comments were interesting again except in the case of some of the foul language used, so be aware of that. Some more material on the topic, and from a different source. UVA's answer to rape allegations a farce Being from CNN the video will want to start up when it check in to read the story. Of course there are ways to avoid that or at least not be bothered by it, is by having a set of headphones on your PC--and don't have them on most of the time.
First, this charge is predicated on the profoundly false premise that race and sex (or "gender" as it is now referred to) are analogous.... there are no differences between black and white human beings, there are enormous differences between male and female human beings. That is why sports events, clothing, public rest rooms, and (often) schools are routinely divided by sex....Because racial differences are insignificant and gender differences are hugely significant, there is no moral equivalence between opposition to interracial marriage and opposition to same-sex marriage.
Second, if opposition to same-sex marriage is as immoral as racism, why did no great moral thinker, in all of history, ever advocate male-male or female-female marriage? Opposition to racism was advocated by every great moral thinker...
Unprofitable Servant wrote: Peter (you know the guy who said we ought to obey God rather than man to the Sanhedrin) he did get it either. Guess he didn't have the spiritual insight he needed. I Peter 2 13 Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; 14 Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well. 15 For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: 16 As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God. 17 Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king.
We are in agreement on that I would say many times we are when it doesn't come to politics. Anyway, an excellent choice of verses.
While of course I have no use for Ricky, the few comments that SA has up for the thread I can agree with.
Gil Rugh said or, wrote: Paul says, as believers, we are not to posses our bodies "...in lustful passion." The contrast is that the believer is to have control of his body, while the unbeliever cannot control his own body. The believer has control of his body because of the work of redemption that Christ has accomplished. The unbeliever, however, is controlled by his passions, and that leads to lustful activity.....
This is what happens in sexual sin. A third party is always wronged and defrauded. For example, in a marriage relationship devastated by the sinful activity, the husband or wife is always wronged. Even in a relationship outside of marriage, a third party is defrauded. When you are having a sexual relationship with someone you are not married to, you are defrauding someone else. The purity of our bodies belongs to the person to whom God intends us to marry. One can see the truth that, from God's perspective, someone has been wronged.
This is a serious matter, and yet sometimes we fail to recognize this truth....
I'm sorry to say that site that I used to use for the ISBE has changed considerably. so you can find dr. Shodde excellent article on Interpretation at this location. for that matter, I might as well give you a sermon on biblical interpretation as well, Principles of Bible Interpretation.
Unfortunately, J.I Packer, is really an unreformed Anglican. Oh, on Shakespeare, this is an interesting article, Shakespeare First Folio found in French library . I would suggest you read the first two comments to the article as well. The second contained a very good defense of the Elizabethan government.
The ESV etc. is a Bible done by evangelical Christians, rather than the non-Christian Anglican Church.
Romans 1 18Â For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19Â because that which is known of God is revealed in them, for God revealed it to them. 20Â For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse. 21Â Because, knowing God, they didnâ€™t glorify him as God, neither gave thanks, but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless heart was darkened.
Jim Lincoln wrote: Apparently, you can just repeat the picture again for what happened last night, Streets of Ferguson left smoldering The place certainly didn't protect the property Ferguson business owners.
A detailed article about Ferguson from England of all places,