SteveR wrote: Ive been an occasional poster & avid listener here for several years. I only stepped in during the papal transition because I couldnt distinguish this site from the most vile atheist sites by the posts. Being antiCatholic & understanding a Reformed catechism doesnt make you a Christian.
There is nothing on this site as vile as your endorsement of Rome's anathemas of all true believers. Who does Rome anathematize?
SteveR wrote: Only false believers, the ones that are liars.
SteveR wrote: Not true, I dont accept RCC dogma on salvation. Keep your lies to yourself
Your inconsistency is your responsibility not mine. There comes a point where gross inconsistency from an educated and articulate man reveals him to be a liar. Lies - you say?
You have stated on these forums that Rome anathematizes "Only false believers, those that are liars."
Yet Rome anathematizes all those who hold to imputed righteousness and justification by faith.
Therefore, if you are consistent, you MUST believe that the doctrine of imputed righteousness and justification by faith is a lie in order for their anathematised adherents to be what you have stated to be only false believers and liars.
The two choices on the issue are: 1. the doctrines of imputed righteousness which you have clearly identified as a lie and as something held to by false believers and liars. 2. Rome's doctrine of infused righteousness.
In the absence of either 1. a third option 2. any retraction by you of your endorsement of Rome's anathemas I repeat to you SteveR:
Hunter wrote: Who are you kidding? You are not a protestant. You believe in infused righteousness, a false and papist doctrine.
4/6/13 5:15 PM
