Well someone did show up to testify on behalf of the wrist slitter in the hospital with a nervous break down. A female friend was determined to say something of value on behalf of the woman. After awhile however, the friend started to get angry at the attitude of some nuns taking evidence against, I mean "for" the woman in the hospital.
Finally the friend got extremely angry and told a nun that what was going on reminded her of the Spanish Inquisition, and the nun told that was quite taken aback.
Eventually, a decision was made about the annulment and the wrist slitter who was out of the hospital by this time, received an official document announcing the official decision of the Roman Catholic Church, and she read it.
The Annulment (2) The Annulment (1) 10/14/14 11:11 AM
The husband who came up with the Roman Catholic Church annulment plan was heard to say, and I paraphrase, "I got lot's of money", "And I know who to contact".
Strange as it may seem, not to long there after there was an annulment hearing, while the lady wrist slitter was in the hosiptal with a nervous breakdown and thus couldn't attend the annulment hearing.
Would any one attend the annulment hearing to represent the lady in the hospital with a nervous breakdown? Or, would the "husband" have it all his own way and get his quicky annulment?
John UK wrote: I realise this is a secular world's version of a prophecy, but if it is based on current statistics, it could well come to pass, and anyway we shall know within two months seeing as the projection is short term. And if found correct, what will the projection be for six months?
I remember posting that around a million cases of Ebola were expected by this January according to one writer. And then someone poo pooed my comment.
P.S. Have you ever had communication with someone called stardaisy?
Troll Spotter, I know your very good at spotting trolls, however, your not as good as you think you are. For instance, have your troll spotting abilities enabled you to, before this post, spot the troll
The police were fast approaching the car to be investigated. Suddenly, a body in the car rose up into view. The car started and quickly left the scene. The chase was on; the killer was fleeing the police. The police were in hot persuit of the killer they were desperate to catch.
As the police raced towards the home of the man with the rifle, they already knew that the girl who had had her throat slit was dead. But they were worried about her little brother. Where was he? Was he dead also? Had he had his throat slit also?
The car they wanted to investigate was now coming into view.
The man was about to go to work when he noticed a parked car that made him feel uneasy. Uneasy enough to not go to work but rather return to the house he had left and then call the police about the car that made him uneasy. The police inquired if he had a rifle in his house. The police also asked him to describe the car that made him feel uneasy. After describing the car, he was told to lock the front door and keep by his side the rifle he had told the police he had in the house. He was also told the police were on the way to his house.
John UK wrote: ... Every human being has faults - for all have sinned. God's people are declared fully righteous in God's sight, because when they believe they are justified. Anyone trying to be justified by their works does not yet have the Spirit, because the Spirit's initial work is to convince and convict of sin. It is he opens the eyes and reveals this awful truth, that I am a sinner, a guilty sinner, a condemned sinner, a hell-bound sinner. And when this occurs, that man does no longer seek to be justified by his works, because he no longer sees any good works in his life, he says with Paul, "There are none that doeth good..." The imputed righteousness of Christ, given to all who truly believe on him, is the most precious thing, because it is perfect, faultless, pleasing to God, and no-one will ever get to heaven without it.
Thank you John my dear friend.
Having seen your comments for years I expected a good answer from you should you except my invitation and I see God through you gave me my expectations.
You will observe I left out a significant part of your post in my quote from you. I did so for the reason that in my opinion it deserves a separate answer which I will eventually give in God's time.
Once upon a time there was a Roman Catholic lady that Dopey knew. This lady slit her wrists between 6 and 8 times in an attempt to kill herself over a period of years. This lady was very unhappy to put it mildly.
The Roman Catholic lady wrist slitter had a Roman Catholic husband who desperately wanted to get rid of her and tie up with his secret sweetie whom he had had on the side for years. He thought about it and thought about it and he came up with what he considered a tremendous plan.
The Roman Catholic husband I referred to in the last paragraph came up with a really neat plan. Get an annulment he thought, that way the marriage would not be counted a valid marriage in the first place and he and his secret sweetie could ride off into the sunset and live happily ever after.
The husband thought if he could just get the right high up Catholic official to act on his behalf and the annulment was sure to be his...More but I don't know when or if it will be today or tomorrow.
One of the lies God causes "they" to believe through sent delusion is that the Bible is not produced by God and is not God's word because the Bible clearly contradicts itself.
God uses paradoxes in Scripture, that is, contradictory statements which the deluded conclude prove the Bible is not of God and not God's Word.
What the deluded on their way to hell and the Lake of fire don't understand is that the paradoxes are a deliberate trap set by God so they would fall into the trap and perish.
The secret of the paradoxes set by God in Scripture is that both of the contradictory statements are true!
In 10/14/14 12:22 AM, I have explained how my half of the particular paradox we are dealing with is true. And I invite John UK when he has the time to explain how his half of that paradox is also true.
It is clear that John's statement is a flat out contradiction of my statement which was actually James 5:16.
However, I have already stated, "I will go further than that and state that the paradox created by John and my statements does in fact express a "truth", a Biblical truth revealed in Scripture by no less a person than a member of the Godhead, the Holy Spirit.
Both contradictory statements, the paradox, are/is true!
God uses paradoxes in Scripture to trap people He doesn't like and make sure they end up in hell then the Lake of fire. Are you one of them?:
2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness...More
I will go further than that and state that the paradox created by John and my statements does in fact express a "truth", a Biblical truth revealed in Scripture by no less a person than a member of the Godhead, the Holy Spirit.
James 5:16 KJV
Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.
James 5:16 commands all believers, that is, saved, born again, Christians to confess to each other all their "faults" (bad things done while saved) as the Holy Spirit leads them to do.
The verse then explains why that command is given: so that prayer for the one confessing the bad things done while saved will occur to the end that the one having done the bad things will be healed, that is, repent in regard to the specific bad things confessed and thus the person will stop doing those bad things if they are currently still ongoing.
The verse then goes on to comment on the condition preferred by God in regard to the person or persons praying for the confessor. The best condition is a non hypocrite type of person, that is, a person who is currently consistently endeavouring to please God and tries very hard to avoid his/her own personal "faults"...More
John UK said to me, "God sees me as faultless, David."
I said to John UK and everyone else, "Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much."
What John UK said and what I said equals the figure of speech called a paradox.
Definitions of a paradox:
1. "any person, thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature." 2. "a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd but in reality expresses a possible truth."
A careful comparison of what John said to what I said then in turn with the two given definitions of a paradox reveals both definitions are true in relationship to the paradox created by John's statement and my statement.
John's statement claims God counts John faultless. My statement claims God does not count John faultless, hence our two statements create a paradox.
Now read again the two definitions in light of the paradox created by John and my statements.
It is interesting to note that the second definition, in effect, states that the paradox created by John and my statements may express, "a possible truth"...More