Open reach wrote:
If Jesus is your Lord then you'll be concerned to do what he commands. Did you ever study the bible to see what 'church' Christ is the head of? Did you ever ask what church you should belong to? Have you ever been concerned about the Lord's will in this matter or is it just another matter in a long line of such matters where you simply ask his forgiveness for disobeying him?
John, have you ever read Acts 2.42 and specifically the words "They continued stedfastly in the Apostles' doctrine and Fellowship..."? Why do you think doctrine and fellowship was soooo important to these early disciples and why was it important enough for God to record this about them? Now you enjoy neither a people who continue stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and as you have admitted already you do not have fellowship! So John what do you suppose God thinks of your claim to have him as your Lord?

For the record, a few of the men have changed their handles when attacking as well, but oddly, their IP's are anonymized or spoofed. Makes one wonder...

Looking forward to reading your always interesting and sometimes intriguing posts. We need the balance that comes from the female points of view.

Is Fetter your real name? Don't post under any other name it's not allowed on this site

Jim Lincoln wrote:
Concerned, I didn't find any mention in the Cal Thomas article, Suppose Michele Bachmann is right?.

It might look like CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, which sent a nasty letter to Bachmann concerning her comments about Ms. Abedin. CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad, wrote, “We remain eternally grateful that, like Sen. Joseph McCarthy before you, your power is limited, enumerated, and constrained by our nation’s constitution.�

Jim Lincoln wrote:
It is strange this is one of the few things ol' Tony gets right!

complicated wrote:
I wonder what a Syria under the control of Al-Qaeda would be like in a future world?

Hi

I am covered in tattoos, something I can be ashamed of when other well meaning believers turn up there nose at such an obvious statement of former rebellion, UNTIL I REMEMBER I know they are under the blood and forgiven! They might not wash off but like all my far more wicked sins they are 'washed in his own blood' Rev 1: 5 etc

In context above I was stating that we rightly rejoice when say an unmarried sodomite/bisexual/adulterer who has destroyed lives repents and by grace turns his life around to marry. His sins are washed away and remembered no more (except by certain christians). YET the innocent party when his unsaved wife commits adultery, deserts the family home and remarries somehow commits an unpardonable sin (in some eyes) and suffers for the consequences of a Christ hating spouse. Tell me how you think God looks upon that innocent party for there lies the crux of the matter?