Thus, modern versions spring from heretics and the old Standard, the AV, not only contains errors but also the Apocrypha by definition. What version is left which is truly "appointed to be read in churches"?
"But please remember that the Nasb and modern versions contain contributions from the Anglican Liberals Westcott and Hort, who were a couple of heretics. In the 1880's Westcott and Hort wrote their own version of the Bible. When it was sent to America they rejected it as inaccurate and badly translated."
Jim Lincoln wrote: Your KJV is incomplete and more than complete at the same time. The [URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorized_King_James_Version]]]Authorized King James Version[/URL] will contain the Apocrypha, between the Old and New Testaments. If your copy doesn't have that then it isn't an authorized version. At the same time there will be added Scripture in the AV which doesn't belong there, which might be considered the Apocrypha of the New Testament. I would suggest you read the articles, [URL=http://www.dbts.edu/journals/1999/Combs.pdf]]]Errors in the King James Version?[/URL] and [URL=http://www.dbts.edu/journals/2000/Combs.pdf]]]The Preservation of Scripture[/URL] by Dr. William Combs.
2/22/12 4:22 PM
The [URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorized_King_James_Version]]]Authorized King James Version[/URL] will contain the Apocrypha, between the Old and New Testaments. If your copy doesn't have that then it isn't an authorized version. At the same time there will be added Scripture in the AV which doesn't belong there, which might be considered the Apocrypha of the New Testament. I would suggest you read the articles, [URL=http://www.dbts.edu/journals/1999/Combs.pdf]]]Errors in the King James Version?[/URL] and [URL=http://www.dbts.edu/journals/2000/Combs.pdf]]]The Preservation of Scripture[/URL] by Dr. William Combs. 
