
2,386 active users! |
|

|
|
USER COMMENTS BY BARRY FROM KY |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
| · Page 1 · Found: 400 user comments posted recently. |
 |
|
|
5/22/13 12:50 PM |
| barry from ky | | northern ky | |  |  |
|
Posted 58 hours ago Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Bro. James wrote: I say lets take him to Gitmo and "make" him talk !!! It's actually a female Bro. James. I agree, total corruption. All politicians, once elected or appointed, start looking at how they are going to keep their jobs. That is their main concern. Ms. Lerner taking her 5th amendment rights doesn't make her look guilty, does it???  |
|
|
5/18/13 3:51 PM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Posted 6 days ago Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: What a good, sensible answer John U.K.  Anyway, too many churches have forgotten The Truth Behind The Church's Purpose, and that's purpose isn't to be an arm of a political party. Amen to that Brother Jim, just think if the churches in America spent all their time on the gospel. that would be a much bigger impact on culture and society than trying to legislate morality, which NEVER works... |
|
|
5/18/13 8:15 AM |
| barry from ky | | northern ky | |  |  |
|
Posted 6 days ago Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Christopher000 wrote: I agree that derogatory terms such as "homo", or whatever shouldn't be used when referencing homosexuals, but don't use the word "gay" when referring to them? I am a "so-called Christian" because I might use the term " gay people" and because I use it, I may not truly be saved? Have I unwittingly formed a league with Satan who wants everyone to use his word, "gay"? Semantics and very judgemental, I think. There are several examples below and one more would be Christ calling the woman riding a beast, a whore, and there are others. I guess what really caught my eye and bothers me about this thread is the use of the phrase, "My Jesus says, My Jesus would, My Jesus wouldn't", etc, when arguing a point. This gives me the impression that only one person on the board truly knows Him and the rest haven't a clue and must be enlightened. I'm sure this isn't what's Intended but this is the impression I get when reading how the phrase is used. Hey Christopher, I have fallen in these traps on SA before, I think that you and Ms. Lisa should try to remember 2 things: 1. It's the internet and people think that gives them a license to be rude since you are not face to face. 2. Many on SA express their opinion as fact!!! |
|
|
5/17/13 7:38 PM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Lisa wrote: Hi Barry. A summary of how we got where we did: I found it distasteful that so called Christians should call gay people gender benders and I tried to suggest that Jesus would not use such derogatory terms when discussing people. It then turned into- god hates sinners and only loves the elect. Or variations along that theme and I was asked to find exact verses that prove that god loves sinners and hates sin. And eventually accused of being a shallow Christian. I hope that brings it just about up to date !!!! Hello Lisa, I guess I'm shallow too. God did not send his Son just for the Israelite s. He love us enough to send Him for us as well. I don't think we are shallow, I just think we make things so clear!!! |
|
|
5/17/13 6:56 PM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Thanks for that, Christopher. Looks like a meeting in the forest is called for, like John Bunyan and his pilgrims. Hey John, I don't know where these guys live. In 'my old Kentucky home' I could literally have 20 or 30 people show up and it would be okay. We could meet regularly and it would be legal. I wouldn't have a problem. As a matter of fact, the sheriff of our County may even show up for worship. |
|
|
5/17/13 8:39 AM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Christopher000 wrote: To me, nothing will ever replace an actual book. I prefer them over any electronic means. I like to use bookmarks, I like the smell of the paper, I like to highlight and handwrite notes, etc. Totally agree Christopher, I consider myself an avid reader. I read between 25 and 40 books a year. One in five are ebooks. I am 54 years old. Maybe it's a young person's thing. I like my ereader, but would rather read a book. |
|
|
5/14/13 5:20 PM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Facts are in Scripture wrote: The Bible 'believes' in young earth creation. God wrote the Bible (KJV Only). The Elect believe the Bible. Thanks for the answer facts are in scripture, my response to you is, the elect do believe the bible! however, if you are honest you could get 5 of the elect in a room and have them read and interpret a verse out of the bible and get 5 different interpretations. How do you know which one is right? Is it solely based on the one that agrees with your interpretation??? |
|
|
5/14/13 5:16 PM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Just read that this guy was spared the death penalty. So we have the compassion to spare his life, but think of all the lives he has not spared. Not justice!  |
|
|
5/14/13 9:30 AM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
I have a question, if a person believes in their heart, that Jesus is their Savior and he rose from the dead, and sits on the right hand of God his father, but has questions about creation, is he still saved???  |
|
|
5/4/13 9:40 AM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: How is insane can anybody be to make the statements that you made on your post above? The First Amendment guarantees Freedom of Religion which means that nobody can interfere with how someone practices their religion. And that includes students in public schools and factory workers if they arrive late because they were practicing their religion in the manner that they wished to do on any particular day. I don't know what you do for a living John Y. however, I can assure you after 21 years of faithful service to my company, if I arrived to work late and told them I was praying, I would be terminated. I would get away with it a few times but they would send me packing! Corporations have no conscience. It's merely business.  |
|
|
4/26/13 1:08 PM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: The news says: "Senior Obama administration officials have secretly authorized the interception of communications carried on portions of networks operated by AT&T and other Internet service providers, a practice that might otherwise be illegal under federal wiretapping laws." Just out of curiosity, how does that which is illegal become legal without a change in the law itself? I might suggest it is still illegal until Congress changes the law, not the exec branch secretly skirting it. But that would be the constitutional thing to do, and these antinomians care little about such matters. I think that Unprofitable Servant is right Mike, "W" pushed thru the 'Patriot Act' and now the government can listen in on communications and internet traffic. It's all for national security. |
|
|
4/25/13 3:04 PM |
| Barry from KY | | Northern KY | |  |  |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: "any one of us would have done likewise" is a very large crock. Total agreement Mike, a very large crock, indeed!  |
|
|
|
|
|

|

|