There is no legal justification for the creation of a Nation by taking the land of others away from them as in the so-called Balfour Declaration which has no lawful basis nor did the UN when they created the state of Israel. Most Christians have blindly and ignorantly support Israel which is a created state of the United Nations and not one of historic authorization.
God destroyed Jerusalem and Israel in 70 AD for rejecting Jesus Christ crucified him and persecuting his Apostles including the martyrdom of John.
Even Orthodox conservative Jews disagree with the creation of the Zionist state of Israel agreed that God did not authorize nor did any lawful order of the United Nations. Christians need to read how Israel was created before they continue to ignorantly support it while it actually persecute genuine Christianity and as a corrupt liberal state of secular humanism.
The unjust creation and displacement of Palestinian people to create an artificial state solely for the Jews based upon nothing has provoked them to not recognizing the state and retaliated against its forceful militarism within the region.
Would Americans approve of giving California, Arizona, and New Mexico back to Mexico along with Texas? no they would not and if it was forcefully created guess
Very surprised to see Grudem take this public position as if "he who knows the right thing and does not do it for him it is sin..." means that those who do not vote for Donald Trump are sinning. Really? How open is this debate really and truly? Wayne makes the strongest arguments for Trump but consider this now:
Proverbs teaches that an open enemy is better than a false friend. Wayne's argument is For the false friend, that Trump is actually really good for the country. but consider a religious equivalent. Which is worse, an open proponent of Islam or a false teacher in Christianity? Proverbs says an open enemy is better than a false friend. An argument can be made that Hillary is the open enemy and Trump is the false friend.
Trump is advocating, proclaiming to be conservative while at the same time deriding and opposing Christian conservative social moral principles (LGBT agenda) which are the basis for Law and Order and if violated and changed would actually instead increase the persecution of Christians from within the GOP itself.
This is what makes Trump dangerous I believe is that he is infiltrating and changing the principles of the Republican Party and therefore leaving Christians no influence or Representatives of their views in Washington or state gover
This is much the same way as Trump is advocating, proclaiming to be conservative while at the same time deriding and opposing Christian conservative social moral principles which are the basis for Law and Order and if violated and changed would actually instead increase the persecution of Christians from within the GOP itself. This is what makes Trump dangerous I believe is that he is infiltrating and changing the principles of the Republican Party and therefore leaving Christians no influence or Representatives of their views in Washington or state governments. This is more dangerous then an open enemy because it erodes conservative principles within the most conservative party up till now.
NFL and NBA have both publicly derided opposition to transgender and homosexuality and therefore Christians. Yet professing Christians hold pro sports in high esteem as if there is no conflict of principles. Time to choose.
Fortune 500 companies and professional sports and media organisations are all in full agreement and are opposed to Christians Who oppose homosexual Behavior and are increasing their public activism and public persecution accordingly.
then Donald Trump comes in and mocks and despises and absolutely ignores it and puts in a homosexual speaker name Thiel co-founder of PayPal to tear it all down. Trump will persecute Christians. He is liberal.
This is the result of Donald Trump's activism, it was his convention to organise and permit speakers to speak to his crowd. This reflects his agenda to make the GOP more inclusive, more liberal, just like he is. Now you see the real Donald Trump. The goal is to abolish conservative social principles at the minimum. It is also therefore a sign of persecution against Christians opposed to homosexual behavior.
Trump has infiltrated the GOP and taken over. Ted Cruz stood alone on principle and was derided for it.
Time to drop your PayPal account if you still have one. Thiel's business.
Private property in a business, freedom of speech, and Liberty of conscience are all at stake in this. Isn't religious freedom the entire reason America was founded by Church of England dissenters? the Constitution defends absolutely freedom of speech and freedom of religion and if it's lost America is no longer Freedom for Christians. Instead it would become tyrannical an anti-christian in persecution for a new liberal Orthodoxy to which all must bow the knee. Christians will become the persecuted Heretics of liberal humanistic philosophy which must be punished by a new tyrannical government To which all must pledge allegiance.
Pence is window-dressing for Trump to con Christians to support him. Some of his positions are good but the how he will do it is everything. Trump is a liberal who has infiltrated the GOP and tea party principles and Conservative Christian principles will be sidelined entirely. Don't be deceived, he's already showing his true colors, e.g. lgbtq speech at convention. Law and Order is good and necessary. But what kind of laws will he allow against Christians since he is liberal? Trade tariffs are not free market and end up penalizing American consumers and some serious trade Wars where Americans will lose.
important Flattered by power and flexible on principles (he caved in to pressure against Religious Freedom Protection Act after first defending it) Pence has allowed Trump to use him as window-dressing to deceive Christians to support Trump for President.
According to the CDC men who have sex with men are an increasing and High incidence rate of hepatitis. Yet the mainstream media will not issue the public health warning as in most other cases they do instead blaming it almost one hundred percent on illicit drugs.
Ironically the decision of Boyce to allow Dwight Moody grounds for his so-called evangelism was very permissive of the inroads of PC Arminianism and of a man who relied on emotionalism and Sankey's organ music to get decisions. Moody was the Forerunner of Modern evangelism and not even a Baptist. That was a very bad decision and the beginning of a downgrade And theologically weak Christianity in practice. He succumbed to the fear of men which is a snare of being called a hyper calvinist so he tolerated Moody's tare-planting evangelism even though he disagreed with Moody's theology and paedobaptism.
Great Sermon! Includes prophetic meaning of Apocalypse and a sound refutation of Spurgeon's misinterpretation of the verse that God desires all men to be saved, Universally, rather than all the elect.
And here the liberal fascists of the United Nations regarding child's human rights are absolutely silent. And instead deliberately Target Christianity in the UK as their objective to destroy. see the other article on the news to compare.
Typical media hit piece. Of course it defies modern so-called science. The great scientists of the past like Sir Isaac Newton had no problem at all with the story of the flood or accepting it as true unlike today's liberal Scientists who have been indoctrinated into believing uniformitarianism.
The Southern Baptist Association has become liberal and politically correct and tries to shame it's historic founders as if they are more holy than them which is ridiculous because they are far from it. Their hypocrisy stinks and yes all this under Al Mohler. their Calvinistic theology is inferior to that of their founders and the practices of the churches are grossly irreverent And unscriptural. Their empire is crumbling as they try to dictate PC policy to member churches like a Protestant Vatican. Their Founders would be ashamed.
The government is erasing the definition of transvestite and you no longer hear it in the media. just like you no longer hear the word homosexual Or sodomy from the government. Transgender is the new transvestite fixed up for the public acceptance just like Gay was substituted for homosexual. It's Orwellian speak.
Please note that Donald Trump met recently with the Evangelical leaders as well as this article here. So trumpet targeting as a strategy To court evangelicals which is completely unnatural to him as he expresses no true real Christian faith whatsoever. So why fall into his hands someone who is courting Evangelicals merely for the purpose of being elected? He is not trustworthy whatsoever. He is a pragmatist con man without any Christian principles whatsoever, or any constitutional or conservative principles whatsoever.
This is a radical and brazen 'in your face' declaration. Obama is obsessed with forcing his agenda and belief on all! Where is liberty of conscience and religious freedom of expression in America now? He is thinking like a King, not a President!
And I thought liberals did not believe in making laws about morality and dictating to others. Behold, the hypocrite!
Americans never complied with bowing to Kings or Usurpers of authority.
The great American Patriot and Baptist Richard Furman wrote about this when communist heresy first began to justify and misinterpret the Bible on social matters. "The Christian golden rule, of doing to others, as we would they should do to us, has been urged as an unanswerable argument against holding slaves. But surely this rule is never to be urged against that order of things, which the Divine government has established; nor do our desires become a standard to us, under this rule, unless they have a due regard to justice, propriety and the general good.
A father may very naturally desire, that his son should be obedient to his orders: Is he, therefore, to obey the orders of his son? A man might be pleased to be exonerated from his debts by the generosity of his creditors; or that his rich neighbour should equally divide his property with him; and in certain circumstances might desire these to be done: Would the mere existence of this desire, oblige him to exonerate his debtors, and to make such a division of his property? Consistency and generosity, indeed, might require it of him, if he were in circumstances which would justify the act of generosity; but, otherwise, either action might be considered as the effect of folly and extravagance."