Jim Lincoln wrote: Yes, there have been corrupt men corrupting the scripture such as the Anglican Bishop
And Jim; Don't forget to mention the two Anglican Liberal heretics who helped write your bible the NASB, and modern versions, Westcott and Hort.
"The Westcott and Hort (B and Aleph) Text Was Based Only on the "Crime" of Partial and Unrepresentative Evidence"
"To cast away at least nineteen-twentieths of the evidence on points and to draw conclusions from the petty remainder, seems to us to be necessarily not less even than a crime and a sin, and only by reason of the sacrilegious destructiveness exercised thereby upon Holy Writ, but also because such a method is inconsistent with conscientious exhaustiveness and logical method." [Dean Burgon]
"Westcott and Hort used only partial evidence and a very unrepresentative sample agreeing with less than 1% of the manuscript history. Ximenes and Erasmus, on the other hand, though also using partial evidence, had a representative sample agreeing with over 99% of the manuscript history." (Dean Burgon Soc)