[QUOTE]Only perhaps some contributing genes, but not some master gene. Natural selection would have done away with a homosexual gene by now. It one man was zapped by a gama ray, fine, but we have a broad array of species that engage in various sexual behaviors (including homosexuality). There is no possible way for the Super Uncle to be a sufficient evolutionary explanation. Homosexuality cuts at the heart of evolution, by that, natural selection.
[AUTHOR]Don Randolph[/AUTHOR]Amazing. Perhaps this is why they have not found genetic evidence for homosexual orientation. (and never will)[/QUOTE]
Mormonism is the most polytheistic religion on the planet. God isn't really God but a god. Um, crystal clear it's not Christian. If it's Christian than what's not Christian?
"Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum told Fox News Sunday that he believes Romney, like every Mormon he knows, "has great moral values," and that Romney is a Christian if he says he is."
Classic Rick Santorum nonsense. I must have missed the parable of the talking tree Rick. You know, the one that has bad fruit but says it has good fruit, therefore it has good fruit. What a joke.
Sreph wrote: Thats interesting jpw. I've never been able to understand any of your posts either.
Yup your absolutely correct jpw, - people do get killed during wars. Incredible that isn't it. BTW are you a hippy, peace and love and all? If so whats your take on Israel's conquest of Canaan, and the way God handled it?
Don't forget that during the second world war Marty, Germany was just about as "Christian" as America was. Obviously what is necessary to follow your inclination is a bomb and bullet which kills non-Christians only. Why don't you invent one. Then you both can vote for Ron Paul.
Who said the bombs dropped the Christian population?
They don't want to live under a Muslim government. We aren't discipling the nations for Christ, we are discipling the nations for Allah. Does the Arab Spring mean anything to you? Does it bother you that our military burns bibles so they don't get into Afghanistan?
Person of Interest wrote: I probably would. Paul attended the services of people who no longer followed God, so I don't see any harm in doing so. My presence does not equal my condoning of the actions any more than Jesus's presence at the wedding equaled His condoning of the drinking going on. (and no, I don't think turning water into wine was condoning the drinking, either). Gay marriage is wrong, as is homosexuality in general, but if a friend of mine who is a homosexual asked me to go to a wedding, I would lovingly accept. I would hope that perhaps I could be used by God while I'm there.
There is such a thing as condoning an act by implication (i.e. approval by silence or approval by action). What you believe in your head is irrelevant to the point here. Please read 1 Corinthians 8. We must care about how our actions affect other people. If you just sit quietly at a gay wedding, you seem to be approving of it to other people. You can protest all you want in your mind, but you are still helping to create an environment of rebellion and lawlessness.
I'm a Puritan not an Anabaptist. This place is getting darker. No more lukewarm Christianity. No more friends of bankers, warmongers, or statist. No more Perrys, Romneys, Guliannis, Santorums, Christies or Cains.
11/30/11 9:49 AM
