|
|
USER COMMENTS BY LANCE ECCLES |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 9 · Found: 500 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
10/19/08 11:58 PM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Michael Hranek wrote: the lifeless piece of bread that Catholics turn into an idol worshipping it as if it were Christ Himself physically present? (only for about 15 minutes while he dissolves if they receive the waffer ) I hope something (divine grace) stops your fall before it is too late, Michael. |
|
|
10/14/08 9:51 PM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
mrs.a.merica wrote: Is it consistent for a servant of the Lord to denounce the R.C.C. as the very seat of the Antichrist, as Paisley has rightly done in countless sermons and articles over the years and then turn around and offer his commendation to those who practice that "faith" ? ? ? I suppose that, with the passing of the years, he's recognized his error, and that all the bible quotes in support of that error have been nothing but wishful thinking and misinterpretations. |
|
|
10/13/08 8:48 PM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Enough already, I'm sorry my reply came across as flippant. That was not my intention. When I spoke of sin, I was not referring so much to grave matters like murder and adultery, but to all the minor sins that we commit all the time: impatience, unkind words, little lies, and such things. Each one of these is a blot on the soul, and while not deserving of hell, they are all hateful in the sight of God. But as you imply, the true believer repents of them as soon as they are committed, and it is only with God's grace that it is possible to repent of them. |
|
|
10/13/08 1:12 AM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jenny wrote: It is arrogance to say that one denomination is the true Church. Well, put it this way: there is the true church, and then there are the denominations. Strictly speaking, the RCC is not a "denomination". |
|
|
10/12/08 5:20 PM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: I do believe that I should put up this commentary, [URL=http://www.carolineglick.com/e/2008/10/the_convenient_war_against_the.asp]]]The Convenient War Against the Jews[/URL], which shows at least an ongoing dislike of Italians for the Jews, which there is little doubt that this Pope also had for them, One has to remember this Pope had other behavior which made him deserve the title, [URL=http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=hitler_intro]]]"Hitler's Pope" Pius XII---Introduction[/URL]. I have no doubt he wanted to protect Catholics and even more especially the priests. Anyway, I'm not a mind reader of dead men, I'm glad you admit to not being a mind reader, Jim.The first article says nothing about the pope or the Vatican. The second article relies on John Cornwell's Hitler's Pope for its information, and as I've pointed out before, Cornwell has now retracted what he wrote in that book. It's time Professor Noble removed his article from the internet. |
|
|
10/11/08 11:59 PM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: She can't intercede for anyone, nor any other Romish "Saint" She is first of all a model for other Catholics, especially Indian Catholics, to imitate and draw inspiration from. |
|
|
10/10/08 5:44 PM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
enough already wrote: You, Lance, and John Y. continually respond to postings pertaining to your worldly church, Don't know why you include John Y. He's got his own church, neither Protestant nor Catholic. |
|
|
10/9/08 11:05 PM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
hidemi williges wrote: If in fact, Peter was in Rome then Paul screwed up and disrespected Peter by not addressing him in his epistle to the Romans. Oh yes, I forgot. Peter signed off from Babylon in his first epistle (5:13). He wasn't in Rome after all; he must have been visiting Saddam Hussein in Iraq. |
|
|
10/9/08 8:56 PM |
Lance Eccles | | Goulburn NSW | | | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
enough already wrote: Lance, who do you follow, the pope, or Jesus Christ? Enough already, I'm sure you know the Catholic answer to that.I follow Jesus Christ, and therefore I follow his vicar (representative) on earth, successor to St Peter, the Rock on which Jesus founded his Church. At the same time, I know that you do not accept that the pope is the vicar of Christ, or that he is the successor of Peter. And you probably do not even accept that Peter is the Rock. And Democratic Conservative, don't forget the millions of chihuahuas sacrificed in Catholic churches on Sundays. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|